Convicted By Suspicion -- Why Scott Peterson May Be Innocent

The Hollywood Investigator ^ | 11/30/2004 | J. Neil Schulman

[Fitzcarraldo]

His alibi stunk and he seemed happy to see her and Conner out of the picture.

[Fitzcarraldo]

His alibi stunk and he seemed happy to see her and Conner out of the picture.

[Conspiracy Guy]

Did John F. Kennedy commit suicide?

[CAWats]

Hee hee.

[SSG USA]

Well it wouldn't be the first time that someone was rigthly convicted for the wrong reasons. Regardless, he was still convicted. The outcome was right, even if the path to it was wrong.

With OJ it was the wrong verdict for the wrong reasons. Mark Furmen, not OJ, was the defendant for the majority of that trial. And Cochrane and Scheck were accomplices to the crime of the century in my opinion.

[elbucko]

This is just a blatant advertisement, moron. Go peddle your crap somewhere else.

[LYSandra]

There are too many points in this to address each one, however, not finding any evidence of a purchase of say poison - Scott's work took him to Mexico frequently-he very well could have purchased wahtever there-also he could have smothered her and there would not have been blood etc. Common sense and logic bring you to the only conclusion that he did this horrible thing.

[7.62 x 51mm]

Yikes! It does make one think, doesn't it?

I didn't follow the trial, except to constantly tune-out that Chubby Fox News Babe, who prattled on endlessly about it, so I don't know all the nuances and fine points of the unfolding circumstantial evidence.

Part of me still believes that he didn't do it, but he's never protested his innocence or defended himself, that I'm aware.

[semaj]

Is this guy series?

Maybe not, but he sure is a moran.

[bikepacker67]

Are you a Raelian?

LOL!

[Chad Fairbanks]

I think you and I agree... Part of me thinks he may have done it, or is not unhappy that it happened, but another part of me is kinda surprised regarding the "evidence" they convicted him on...

[WildTurkey]

Isn't against policy to advertise on FR?

[dc-zoo]

Of course Laci killed herself and dumped her own body in the bay with concrete anchors attached. Just goes to show as we know that ignorance is Blix.

[Jersey Republican Biker Chick]

"Aren't you the guy who maintained O.J. was innocent? .......and even wrote a book about it?"

If the glove doesn't fit; you must acquit!

[7.62 x 51mm]

I agree with you 100% on both premises, CF.

[blanknoone]

Good post. I am not familiar with your stance on OJ, nor do I care. If you ask me if Scott is the likely killer, the answer is yes. If you ask is it beyond a reasonable doubt, the answer is no. Even in conjunction, all of the circumstancial evidence is far from 'beyond a reasonable doubt'

I thought your point about Scott's fishing alibi being public for a long time before the body showed up puts a big ding in the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' of the biggest piece of evidence.

I know most murder cases are not cut and dried and rely on circumstancial evidence to a significant degree....but this is far too circumstancial for my taste. I think he was convicted of murder on proof he was a jerk.

[Jersey Republican Biker Chick]

I guess Scotty should have hired Cochrane!

[ApesForEvolution]

OJ did it...

[Judith Anne]

Only in Hollyweird can several mistresses, debt,and an insurance policy be no motive.

And in this author's fantasy.

[Judith Anne]

So, you're just going to post your article, and not defend it? If so, you're trolling.