To: J. Neil Schulman
Well it wouldn't be the first time that someone was rigthly convicted for the wrong reasons. Regardless, he was still convicted. The outcome was right, even if the path to it was wrong.
With OJ it was the wrong verdict for the wrong reasons. Mark Furmen, not OJ, was the defendant for the majority of that trial. And Cochrane and Scheck were accomplices to the crime of the century in my opinion.
25 posted on
11/30/2004 10:41:25 AM PST by
SSG USA
To: SSG USA
I guess Scotty should have hired Cochrane!
To: SSG USA
The outcome was right, even if the path to it was wrong.Sounds like CBS's excuse for RatherGate, i.e., The accusation is correct even if the evidence was forged.
87 posted on
11/30/2004 11:21:07 AM PST by
bruin66
(Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson