Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry's Less than Honorable Discharge Proven!
The Pajamahadeen ^ | 10/29/2004 | Pajama bin Bloggin

Posted on 10/29/2004 9:55:24 PM PDT by Pajama bin Bloggin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: REDWOOD99
I'm sorry if you missed this and the other posts. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1258164/posts The other shoe will drop Sun.

Not a very friendly neighborhood here lately. I can't believe the cynicism and sniping going on over this. It was suggested on the swiftvets site that maybe the freepers could help. Who wudda thunk that they would be snubbed when they came here for ideas and help.

Eating our young, as was posted by someone else, is what is going on here. That, and protecting some imaginary electronic turf.

I once thought this was a pretty cool place. Now, everybody wants to be the next Buckhead, but nobody wants to go out to a rally and help the vets by getting a little fresh air and sunshine for a couple of hours. What a joke.

121 posted on 10/30/2004 3:21:06 AM PDT by Unruly Human (An Khe, Pleiku, DakTo 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Pajama bin Bloggin
I hope they can pull it off. The deck's stacked against them, but the POWs sure do deserve this one.
122 posted on 10/30/2004 3:38:08 AM PDT by Novel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unruly Human
I once thought this was a pretty cool place. Now, everybody wants to be the next Buckhead, but nobody wants to go out to a rally and help the vets by getting a little fresh air and sunshine for a couple of hours. What a joke.

The Swift Vets need our support. If it wasn't for them, Kerry would be +10 now. Sunday is going to be that day, that the TRUTH about Kerry is coming out.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if there are some moles here (Hello Lockhart, suck an egg. You should be ashamed of yourself for intimidating a Fox News female reporter).
123 posted on 10/30/2004 3:39:35 AM PDT by igoramus987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: occutegirl

While I abhor the primarily-leftist technique of last-minute releases of information designed to sway the opinions of the "undecided", I agree that it's not too late.

More specifically, it's never to late to proffer the truth. My only hope is that -- whatever the outcome of the election -- the efforts of the brave men who have given so much to expose Kerry's unpatriotic activities and shameful behavior, are not forgotten. Whether Kerry is the sitting president or the pathetic losing candidate in the dirtiest, least honorable campaign in our country's history, I want the truth to come out.

The truth is the truth, and the quest for it should not be abandoned simply because it has no further political use.


124 posted on 10/30/2004 4:02:44 AM PDT by DJ Frisat (Hand me the duct tape before my head explodes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
We are positive that John Kerry was one of those dishonorably dismissed from the Navy for collaborating with the Viet Cong, after he was released from active duty but still in the Navy, and for a totally unauthorized trip to Hanoi.

This is the first time I have ever heard that Kerry visited Hanoi. I just don't think there is any there there. The official Navy records that have been released show that Kerry received an Honorable Discharge through the normal process and that he transitioned through the standard reserve process.

I base my observations on personal experience as a naval officer who served at the same time. I resigned my commission in 1972 after over 7 years of active duty and was transferred into the Standby Reserves. I received my Honorable Discharge on Feb 16, 1978, which was accompanied by the same letter Kerry received signed by Clayton.

125 posted on 10/30/2004 6:12:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Not a very friendly neighborhood here lately. I can't believe the cynicism and sniping going on over this. It was suggested on the swiftvets site that maybe the freepers could help.

Who wudda thunk that they would be snubbed when they came here for ideas and help.

Eating our young, as was posted by someone else, is what is going on here. That, and protecting some imaginary electronic turf.

I once thought this was a pretty cool place. Now, everybody wants to be the next Buckhead, but nobody wants to go out to a rally and help the vets by getting a little fresh air and sunshine for a couple of hours. What a joke.

Agree 100%. I see a lot of references to "we" and "us". I guess since this isn't a serious, meaningful FREEP, it must be bogus.

This is the first time I have ever heard that Kerry visited Hanoi. I just don't think there is any there there. The official Navy records that have been released show that Kerry received an Honorable Discharge through the normal process and that he transitioned through the standard reserve process.

Now Navy Chief is trying to cobble together a cockamamie politicals stunt for the benefit of the very same old media that won't dig into Kerry in the first place. Why? What possible freaking sense does that make?

It's not that you're new, it's because a lot of us had never heard of Navy Chief before today, and he pooched his own thread at the Swift Vets site and messed up his credibility here big-time. What was the point of that jerk-around today? What's the point of this D.C. stunt that may not even come off?

Do you get the impression that some people are trying a little too hard to dissuade you?

The thread is still there. There are legalities involved since they are a 527(?)which is why you see the obligatory admin "warnings" and "disclaimers".

The discrepencies in the "official records" are explained. You might have to read a little, including the FBI surveilance obtained through FOIA.

They have been digging for the "proof" for weeks and finally hit paydirt last night.

I have long been a lurker here. I started following the flow at SBVT several months ago, and found them to be very serious and credible. There is a lot more "analysis" and less "cheerleading".

THEY have a track record or getting visibility and attention.

There is way too much ego here (i.e. NIH sysndrome), but little in the way of "track record" of "making a difference". The "proof" that some request will not be published here, for reasons that should be obvious.

Would you prefer they lay out the whole plan in this open, public forum in advance of the rally/press conference?

I wouldn't.

I see a lots of concern for "our reputation". Perhaps you should ask yourselves "Who knows or cares what FR thinks?". Certainly not the MSM.

Do you assume that the general (voting)public will get their information from this site?

Do you think that you can make a difference in this election?

Unfortunately many still get it from the MSM. They have the power, influence exposure and attention. Use it. That is the secret of asymmetrical warfare. Divide and conquer. The Leftists have understood that message for a long time.

The Truth Is Out There - You can wait and read about it on Drudge & elsewhere, or you can help make it happen.

All they are asking for is people to show up, so that they can't be ignored by the MSM.

There are plenty of seats in the bleachers for spectators.

Your choice.

126 posted on 10/30/2004 7:23:31 AM PDT by Socrates1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Not a very friendly neighborhood here lately. I can't believe the cynicism and sniping going on over this. It was suggested on the swiftvets site that maybe the freepers could help.

Who wudda thunk that they would be snubbed when they came here for ideas and help.

Eating our young, as was posted by someone else, is what is going on here. That, and protecting some imaginary electronic turf.

I once thought this was a pretty cool place. Now, everybody wants to be the next Buckhead, but nobody wants to go out to a rally and help the vets by getting a little fresh air and sunshine for a couple of hours. What a joke.

Agree 100%. I see a lot of references to "we" and "us". I guess since this isn't a serious, meaningful FREEP, it must be bogus.

This is the first time I have ever heard that Kerry visited Hanoi. I just don't think there is any there there. The official Navy records that have been released show that Kerry received an Honorable Discharge through the normal process and that he transitioned through the standard reserve process.

Now Navy Chief is trying to cobble together a cockamamie politicals stunt for the benefit of the very same old media that won't dig into Kerry in the first place. Why? What possible freaking sense does that make?

It's not that you're new, it's because a lot of us had never heard of Navy Chief before today, and he pooched his own thread at the Swift Vets site and messed up his credibility here big-time. What was the point of that jerk-around today? What's the point of this D.C. stunt that may not even come off?

Do you get the impression that some people are trying a little too hard to dissuade you?

The thread is still there. There are legalities involved since they are a 527(?)which is why you see the obligatory admin "warnings" and "disclaimers".

The discrepencies in the "official records" are explained. You might have to read a little, including the FBI surveilance obtained through FOIA.

They have been digging for the "proof" for weeks and finally hit paydirt last night.

I have long been a lurker here. I started following the flow at SBVT several months ago, and found them to be very serious and credible. There is a lot more "analysis" and less "cheerleading".

THEY have a track record or getting visibility and attention.

There is way too much ego here (i.e. NIH sysndrome), but little in the way of "track record" of "making a difference". The "proof" that some request will not be published here, for reasons that should be obvious.

Would you prefer they lay out the whole plan in this open, public forum in advance of the rally/press conference?

I wouldn't.

I see a lots of concern for "our reputation". Perhaps you should ask yourselves "Who knows or cares what FR thinks?". Certainly not the MSM.

Do you assume that the general (voting)public will get their information from this site?

Do you think that you can make a difference in this election?

Unfortunately many still get it from the MSM. They have the power, influence exposure and attention. Use it. That is the secret of asymmetrical warfare. Divide and conquer. The Leftists have understood that message for a long time.

The Truth Is Out There - You can wait and read about it on Drudge & elsewhere, or you can help make it happen.

All they are asking for is people to show up, so that they can't be ignored by the MSM.

There are plenty of seats in the bleachers for spectators.

Your choice.

127 posted on 10/30/2004 7:24:02 AM PDT by Socrates1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

RCVD&CNFM


128 posted on 10/30/2004 7:33:27 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are a few floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Socrates1
I admit I had some trouble following your meandering musings, but the bottom line is that you need some real proof, not allegations. I don't buy the "just trust us and show up." I did attend the O'Neill et al rally on the Capitol grounds in September. It was not a large crowd, but we were enthusiastic and committed. Why? Because we had facts.
129 posted on 10/30/2004 7:34:16 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

Yep let's not act like Rather.


130 posted on 10/30/2004 7:34:18 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are a few floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Socrates1
I see a lots of concern for "our reputation". Perhaps you should ask yourselves "Who knows or cares what FR thinks?". Certainly not the MSM.

I agree. Who cares about "our reputation"... especially if just because we failed to act and massive voter fraud, Kerry is able to win the election by 0.1%. Is "our reputation" more important than 4 years of appeasement that could set the World back 20 years on the War on Terror. Bill Clinton dropped the ball on Saddam, Sudan, Bin Ladin, and North Korea, and the World is still cleaning up his mess.

The rally is a means to get media coverage, which our side is not getting at the moment because MSM and Kerry are controlling the news cycle. Who Dares Wins.
131 posted on 10/30/2004 7:39:30 AM PDT by igoramus987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Nothing against some of those that have been around on FR for awhile and have been vouching for this, and I think we all know J eFfin K had a less than honorable discharge, but in addition to those that are long time FR posters, there is also a very large number of people vouching for this that have October xx, 2004, as their start up date.
I'm going to consider this a non story and forget about it.


132 posted on 10/30/2004 7:40:06 AM PDT by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

TTFN


133 posted on 10/30/2004 7:43:44 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("I heff good news and bad news. Good news is I saw Allah. Bad news is he was wearing a yarmulke.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Pajama bin Bloggin

BTTT.. adopting a wait and see policy here.


134 posted on 10/30/2004 7:44:57 AM PDT by LowOiL (Christian and proud of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe

LOL. They only do that if it hurts Bush.


135 posted on 10/30/2004 7:53:05 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (I want to return to the day when John Kerry is just a nuisance, like prostitution and gambling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Bingo. Two more points:

1. If these folks have proof that Kerry violated an underaged sheep I'll tell everyone I know, but I want to see some DNA-stained wool first. A failed October surprise will rebound on the President, which brings us to the second point...

2. As numerous freepers have pointed out, their handling of the situation is horrible. Even if the shoe drops today, the impact won't be optimal, and the longer they wait...


136 posted on 10/30/2004 7:55:13 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("I heff good news and bad news. Good news is I saw Allah. Bad news is he was wearing a yarmulke.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Pajama bin Bloggin
All smoke so far. Looking for fire, but also for mirrors.
137 posted on 10/30/2004 7:56:48 AM PDT by VadeRetro (A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state. -MS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socrates1; The Real NavyChief
Do you get the impression that some people are trying a little too hard to dissuade you? The thread is still there. There are legalities involved since they are a 527(?)which is why you see the obligatory admin "warnings" and "disclaimers".

Since you quoted me, you should have credited me, and pinged me while you were at it.

Newsflash for you: the original thread isn't there.

No one's trying to dissuade the Navy Chief, he's being called on to back his play, a play that he took a knee on yesterday afternoon with open receivers. He said he had a former Navy Secretary and the person who gave Kerry his less than honorable discharge. Where's the beef, Chief?

138 posted on 10/30/2004 8:17:00 AM PDT by Fatalis (The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Drudge I know, and Lehman I know, but who are you?

I am nobody and have always been nobody. Personally knowing Drudge and Lehman I know you are a mover and shaker. Perchance why don't you call them and get the low down instead of trying to stop what my be one of the most important election issues in this campaign. I mean with a call you could settle this, why not call?

139 posted on 10/30/2004 8:31:37 AM PDT by Nov3 (Is it just me or has correct titling, formating, and linking of posts become a lost art?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
Personally knowing Drudge and Lehman I know you are a mover and shaker.

Sorry; didn't mean to imply that I know them personally. That line was a paraphrase of a bible verse. I meant that Drudge and Lehman have long track records.

Let me put the shoe on the other foot: If you have hard evidence, call them yourself. Show me some proof and I'll do everything I can to help you get your story out, and I suspect that 99% of FR will do the same.

As other posters have pointed out, the MSM wouldn't cover this important story if it painted itself purple and danced on their desks singing "I'm an Important Story!" Your only chance is the blogsphere and talk radio, and every moment you delay is valuable propagation time lost. If your evidence is the personal testimony of a big cheese, record a video and stream it. If your evidence is documents, scan'em and post'em. You want my help? SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!

140 posted on 10/30/2004 8:48:00 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("I heff good news and bad news. Good news is I saw Allah. Bad news is he was wearing a yarmulke.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson