Posted on 08/17/2004 3:12:41 PM PDT by oblomov
Breaking News: Venezuelas Recall fraud has been unveiled By Aleksander Boyd
London 17 August 2004 20:33GMT Political consultant J.J. Rendon presented irrefutable proof of the electoral fraud performed during the recall referendum in Venezuela. In Bolivar state something suspicious took place; say voting centre X has 3.000 people in the roll. Said centre has three polling booths: in number 1, 1.100 people must vote; in number 2, 1.000; and in number 3, 900 people. Tallies from booth number 1 showed 683 votes for the NO option and 103 votes for the YES option. Tallies from booth number 2 resulted in 587 votes for the NO option and 103 votes for the YES option. Tallies from booth number 3 evidenced 519 votes for the NO option and again 103 for the YES option.
Electoral officials assigned to said centre thought it was extremely unlikely to get such repetitive number of votes for the YES option. So they got in touch with other centres in the area. It turned out that tallies from other centres showed the same pattern, although diverging numbers, i.e. tallies from machines at Y voting centre showed the same consistency for instance 133 votes for the YES option repeated four times. Statistically speaking it is almost impossible for such a pattern to occur.
(Excerpt) Read more at vcrisis.com ...
Ridiculous. Jimmy Carter certified the election.
Perhaps, sooner or later, the sheeple and some renegade historians will come to understand exactly how much this incompetent BLEEP betrayed and attempted to betray this nation.
If you've the time and inclination, may I respectfully suggest you look over the release of the Venona documents.
Wow, if this gets traction and the oil workers strike....who knows?
By all rights, we should pull help the Venezuelans pull an Allende. Or is Chile better or worse off today? Hmmm?
POSSIBLE ANSWER (thanks for planting the research seed--posted for others' benefit):
Link: HERE (scroll down to "Treason Update"
Limbacher notes that in a book by Peter Schweizer, entitled Reagans War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism, Jimmy Carter used Armand Hammer to convey the message that some assistance by them on the Jewish immigration front could make Carter look good enough at home to help him beat Reagan in 1980. Schweizer also cites a 1984 private meeting between Carter and Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrinin, where Carter was apparently attempting to encourage the Soviets to get involved in the effort to keep Reagan from being re-elected in 1984.
It's not clear from the context whether this info is from Venona or is independent. If there's more, I would surely be interested in learning about it.
bump
Electoral officials assigned to said centre thought it was extremely unlikely to get such repetitive number of votes for the YES option.
Perhaps the Chavez' henchmen should have used random number generators to cover their tracks?
Leftists-are-cheaters bump.
Thanks for the suggestion. Is there a particular place where you think it is best to "jump into" the documents?
BTW, if you are completely unfamiliar with Venona, you will absolutely not believe the extent of penetration of the US gov't in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, as indicated by these papers. McCarthy (who never saw Venona, amazingly) was completely correct, and, were it not for the assorted Soviet apologists and traitors still infesting the lamestream media, would have been completely vindicated by Venona's release.
I have only barely heard that the papers showed some people were right about the Communist menace.
It's sad that it took so many years for the evidence to come out.
It's rare that there is an opportunity to read the enemy's words, in the original and uncensored -- rather like having a crack at the computers in DNC's offices (g!).
Only problem with reading about Venona (unless one is either an historian or a student of the cold war; I'm the latter, btw), is that a lot of the names of the players are nowadays unfamiliar. This unfortunate condition tends to necessitate some amount of parallel reading, which is inconvenient for many people.
Not me. Just once was enough. Never voted a D for prez since.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.