It is wrong to compare a person (RUSH) who is 98.5 %
correct to a leftwing pile of dung who is at least
98.5 % wrong.
Quick, hide the cooking sherry, Joseph Sobran
To equate fatso to anyone with a brain is just ludicrous.
Comparing Moore to Limbaugh is ridiculous.
How convenient to blame President Bush for the toddler's killed not only in Iraq but also in Germany 60 years ago. America must be a bad place to elect such terrible leaders. How convenient Uncle Joe forgets to mention Hussein and Hitler. Two terrible tyrants who killed millions to feed their own egos.
For Sobran it's much better to condemn Bush then the terrible two.
What a twit.
TS
Yes indeed. Joe Sobran's obligatory anti-semitic remark. Why am I not surprised.
OTOH. I think Sobran is not so secretly enjoying Bush`s difficulties.
The difference between Moore and Rush is, you will never see Limbaugh sitting at a place of honor next to a former President at the GOP convention. Rush has his place in politics and he is a fantastic supporter of the President, but he is an entertainer first. This is why seeing that fat lump sitting next to one of the worst presidents in US history, was a little off setting to say the least. It was however a very telling moment. No matter how tough the Dems screamed, they embraced a vile socialist who hates America and is willing to sell his vitriol to the highest bidder.
Some conservatives in Hollywood or elsewhere should make a film exposing the Democrats and the Left. The media sure won't!
How about this, get Moore in a debate with Limbaugh, or Coulter, or Steyn, or Macomber, or heck, any big name conservative pundit. We will see how well Moore compares. Except, of course, Moore is too chicken to do so.
If Klein had said this about Larry Nichols (of Clinton Death List infamy), I might have agreed. But Rush doesn't weave conspiracy theories on the air except with his tongue in cheek.
IIRC, so did that paragon of humanity, Jimmy Carter, and he is a "nucular" physicist! I wonder why Moore left that out?
Mark
Michael Moore has much more in common with the American radio broadcasters known as Lord Haw Haw and Axis Sally. He is a traitor to this nation and should meet the same court ordered fate.
Yes, Joe. There actually WAS a time that we visited death and destruction on a country which supported a butcherous madman and people like you didn't whine and shiver about it.
Apples and oranges. Moore has reached maybe 15 million or less people (mostly the already converted for one time in one year, while Rush reaches 20 million every week who go back to their jobs and talk about what he said. And the audience is not just the true believers. Tom Daschle noted that Rush's audience is broad and includes Liberals. He was shocked- and that led to a full court press for a counter to Rush.
And let's face the real truth. Moore comes from a position of hate and a disregard of the truth (propaganda in its true sense) while Rush has to be right or every error will be broadcast on the evening news, since the liberal press is out to destroy him.
I am actually happy that Moore is enjoying his success, for this kind of closed loop adoration will push him into greater deceptions and eventually destroy him. Bush will win and that will set him off totally, for "whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad".
Get ALL of the media out of Iraq and finish the darned thing. It would take less than a month.
If $$$ at the theatre box office is the standard, then the porn industry should be running campaigns. Come to think of it, the actions of many elected officials woud be more appropriate there!
I KNOW Rush Limbaugh, and YOU Mr. Moore (you bloviating fat-ass liar), YOU are NO RUSH LIMBAUGH!!!
LLS
How nice it would be if we had a time machine and could transport Moore's corpulent butt back to, say, 1943. He could make a movie decrying FDR as a war criminal, following which he could make a trip to, say, Georgia, whereupon there would be no Moore no more.
Yeah, I've been hearing this spin from the libs at work for about 6 weeks now.
MM deals in propaganda comprised of outright lies and half truths at best.
Rush simply comments on or reads with little comment the words and deeds of liberals that have been published, shown in MSM. His parodies are what they are - certainly not purporting to be "documentaries".
Definitely just alike.
But then how would the libs parroting this line know - you can't bribe them to actually listen to Rush.
... the Bush tribe, including Vice President Dick Cheney, certainly has a knack for combining its own business interests with public service. The 9/11 horrors do seem to have come at a remarkably convenient time for those interests; all that was needed, as Moore tells it, was to forge a propaganda link between the terrorists and oil-rich Iraq. But Moore ignores another key interest: the Israeli-neocon eagerness for “regime change” in Iraq.