Skip to comments.
Actress Brooke Shields kills 140 of her very own Children by undergoing 7 IVF Treatments
Various
| 07.25.04
Posted on 07/25/2004 10:03:03 PM PDT by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-352 next last
I once had the pleasure of attending a pro-life conference and meeting Dr. Richard Dorflinger of the USCCB, Wesley Smith, Esq., Dr. Angela Lanfranchi of the bcp institute and representatives of Priests For Life, where the focus of the talks were about embryonic stem cell research, cloning and the breast cancer link to abortion. It was very informative and among the many lectures and talks topics such as
In-Vitro Fertilization came up since this is from where the embryonic stem cells come. What was said was that when a couple, single female or a lesbian enters a fertility clinic for IVF up to 24 embryos are fertilized and created and in most instances the procedures fail leaving human life to be frozen, experimented with and killed. When I head this, Brooke Shields came to mind since I remember reading about her 7 attempts to conceive, it's not hard to do the math, she created and killed 140 of her children and 140 of her daughter Rowan's siblings.
The more our culture blindly accepts killing, organ harvesting and treating other human beings as mere property, the further we slide into moral relativism, and it will be very difficult for us some day to make the argument that our own killers should respect our human dignity.
We wonder why we have the Terri Schiavo atrocity, Dr. Kevorkian, eugenics, population control, babies found dead in trash cans and the other atrocities found throughout the world.
FREE Book on Stem Cells and Cloning in understandable language
1
posted on
07/25/2004 10:03:08 PM PDT
by
Coleus
To: Coleus
GET REAL.
She was trying to HAVE A baby ,,,
2
posted on
07/25/2004 10:04:44 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: KQQL
Don't even bother with people like this. They're crazy. And I'm not afraid to say it either.
3
posted on
07/25/2004 10:07:07 PM PDT
by
Hildy
( If you don't stand up for what's RIGHT, you'll settle for what's LEFT.)
To: KQQL
Get Real barely covers it.
Would you deny a person cancer treatments if they "couldn't clear themselves of the cancer by themselves without medical intervention"?
4
posted on
07/25/2004 10:07:07 PM PDT
by
ridesthemiles
(ridesthemiles)
To: Coleus
5
posted on
07/25/2004 10:07:48 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: Coleus
I pray to God that nobody is judged by this rigid a standard when the time comes. If so, no person on earth will be saved.
6
posted on
07/25/2004 10:08:09 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Fox News is Fair and Balanced. Move-on.org is Bare and Imbalanced.)
To: Torie; ambrose
7
posted on
07/25/2004 10:08:11 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: Coleus
YOU SIR/MADAM NEED HELP !
8
posted on
07/25/2004 10:09:22 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: Coleus
9
posted on
07/25/2004 10:09:50 PM PDT
by
diamond6
(Everyone who is for abortion have been born. Ronald Reagan)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
Most Catholics Pray to
St. Gerard when they can not conceive.
10
posted on
07/25/2004 10:09:54 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: ridesthemiles
of course not, that's why this thread his CRAP !
11
posted on
07/25/2004 10:10:06 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: KQQL
Using the troubled logic above male masturbation would be equivalent to genocide.
To: KQQL
What is better?
For 1 baby to be born, grow, learn to know and love god, and become saved, with 1 embyro lost in the process of IVF........or for the 1 baby to never have existed at all?
Abortion is sick and wrong. But people who criticize people who are Trying to Have Children in terms of the extra embryos? You need to rechannel your energy into something less crazy.
To: Coleus
You live in the 10 century.
Medicine is God's blessing too..
14
posted on
07/25/2004 10:11:13 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: Sunnyvale CA Eng.
15
posted on
07/25/2004 10:11:37 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: Coleus
These abbreviated articles really bum me out. Just when you think it's going to get good . . . . . . it ends.
16
posted on
07/25/2004 10:12:03 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Refuse to allow anyone who could only get a government job tell you how to run your life.)
To: Coleus
Uh ... I am pro-life and just don't have enough enegy left to read this. Uh .... Sorry.
To: ridesthemiles
Does the Church shun all medical technology in relation to infertility? By no means. Technology, when used morally, is in fact a solution to many problems. In cases where medical technology can repair or heal damaged reproductive organs it is of great value. In cases where fertility drugs can augment the woman's natural capacity to produce eggs (when used conscientiously and with regard to possible consequences of multiple pregnancies) the Church blesses the technological solution. But technology that usurps the natural biological functions for no legitimate health reason is immoral.
18
posted on
07/25/2004 10:13:37 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: Coleus
Where's the Nut farm nearest to you?
19
posted on
07/25/2004 10:13:49 PM PDT
by
sonserae
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-352 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson