Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ozzy Says He Now Believes Pot Leads To Other Addictions
MTV ^ | 07.08.2003 | Robert Mancini, with reporting by Gideon Yago

Posted on 07/08/2003 2:31:17 PM PDT by presidio9

Ozzy Osbourne may have weathered the lowest lows that drug addiction has to offer, but the news that his son Jack was seeking treatment for substance abuse taught him a lesson that his own decades of addiction never did.

"I used to think they should legalize pot, but you know what? They should ban the lot," Osbourne told MTV News, addressing Jack's battle for the first time. "One thing leads to another. Coffee leads to Red Bull, Red Bull leads to crank.

"When I found out the full depth of him getting into OxyContin, which is like hillbilly heroin, I was shocked and stunned," Osbourne continued. "The thing that's amazing was how rapidly he went from smoking pot to doing hillbilly heroin."

Ozzy's son entered a California rehabilitation facility in April to battle what was later revealed to be an addiction to the prescription painkiller OxyContin (see "Jack Osbourne Reveals He Was Addicted To Painkiller OxyContin"). Jack also said that he was drinking and using a variety of substances — including Vicodin, Valium, Xanax, Dilaudid, Lorcet, Lortab, Percocet and marijuana — before his trip to rehab (see "Rehab Helps Jack Osbourne Get To Root Of Addiction Problems").

Jack's laundry list of controlled substances made his father painfully aware of just how readily available drugs are. "When I started doing drugs years ago, they were hard to get, but today it's everywhere," Osbourne said. "It's not just America. It's not just California. It's not just Beverly Hills. It's not just downtown New York. It's not just London. It's all over the world" (see "All About OxyContin, The Pills Known As 'Killers' ").

This relatively easy access to allegedly "controlled" substances is especially hard for Ozzy to swallow given his firsthand experience with the damage that drugs can do.

"I'm 55 years old, and I didn't get off scot-free," Osbourne explained. "I have to take medication for the rest of my life because I've done so much neurological damage to my body," Osbourne said.

We'll have much more from our interviews with Ozzy and Jack in an "MTV News Now" special report, premiering Tuesday at 11 p.m. ET/PT (Jack's complete interview will appear on MTVNews.com when the show premieres). The show will be followed the next day by a repeat of MTV News' "True Life: I'm Hooked on OxyContin" at 6:30 p.m.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800801-820821-840 ... 1,661-1,662 next last
To: AxelPaulsenJr
"Prove your claim."

Well, I know you don't recognize the very concept of a corollary, but the repeal of Prohibition is about the only historical reference point on this issue. But I'm sure you'll just say the issues are unrelated.
801 posted on 07/10/2003 9:42:11 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
I would ask you to explain what is twisted about it, but you have neither the ability nor the courage to do so.
802 posted on 07/10/2003 9:43:19 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Yes but alcohol was legal before prohibition, and was made so again by it's repeal. Pot has never been legal.
803 posted on 07/10/2003 9:44:51 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
No, dane is more logical.

shudder.
804 posted on 07/10/2003 9:44:58 AM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 795 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
"Pot has never been legal."

Game, set, match. Do you have even the slightest inkling what you are talking about?

805 posted on 07/10/2003 9:45:59 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
priceless
806 posted on 07/10/2003 9:46:09 AM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: MJM59
"Has Jack Osbourne ever done anything that could even remotely resemble a contribution to society??????? "

Probably not....but he IS still a teenager.

807 posted on 07/10/2003 9:46:27 AM PDT by Queen Jadis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Please identify how it will be any worse than alcohol. Don't know that it is, but alcohol is legal, pot is not.

That's rather circular logic don't you think, we are debating why it should or should not be legal. By saying pot is illegal your just avoiding the issue.

Prove your claim.

Did violence increase or decrease after prohibition? If we needed an amendment to limit the use of alcohol why do we not have an amendment limiting the use of drugs? I would say our rights have been wrongfully usurpted by the federal government, for better or worse it makes no difference.

808 posted on 07/10/2003 9:47:46 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
For your information, idiot, MJ was made illegal right about the time of the end of prohibition. That law, which was based on never issued tax stamps, was declared unconstitutional. That is where the CSA came from.

lol.
809 posted on 07/10/2003 9:48:45 AM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Wrong. I don't really care if you die. Really. I care about the harm that your drug use will cause others.


Go ahead, bring it back to alcohol. I have a whole bag of stock answers.
810 posted on 07/10/2003 9:49:52 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 792 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"I care about the harm that your drug use will cause others. "

such as?
811 posted on 07/10/2003 9:50:32 AM PDT by toothless (I AM A MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
You don't think we have legalized drugs? You can't be that stupid. Well, no, maybe you can. And are.

See: that's all you've got. Semantics. You can't really be that stupid that you don't understand the definition of "drugs" for the purposes of this argument. Well, no, maybe you can. And are. Next?

812 posted on 07/10/2003 9:51:37 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Toothless is close to right. It was legal until six years AFTER the repeal of Prohibition. That's right. While alcohol was illegal, pot was legal. Given some of the arguments made on this thread, that is an interesting irony.

You clearly haven't taken the time to be informed on this topic. I'd suggest you start by reading a few of the downright comical assertions about marijuana that were used by Congress as the basis for passage of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. They didn't go quite so far as to say it will turn you into a bat, but close.

813 posted on 07/10/2003 9:53:30 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Yeah, that was a funny movie, but stop trying to change the subject. You are losing this battle because: (A) You have yet to make a valid point and (B) we want you to keep bumping this silly article from MTV. Thanks for being dumb enough to comply.
814 posted on 07/10/2003 9:53:42 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
My definition of drugs, for purposes of this argument, would be intoxicating substances used for recreational purposes. What is yours, brain trust? Things the government has declared to be illegal?
815 posted on 07/10/2003 9:54:44 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
We can bump this thread for weeks as far as I am concerned, so everyone can see that your posts have no credibility, no factual basis, and that you don't have the stones to even make an effort to support your argument.

Great, except that the only people who read 900 post threads that keep repeating themselves really ARE on drugs. Nobody is seeing anything you knucklehead.

816 posted on 07/10/2003 9:55:10 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Oh, no, presidio - it doesn't take 900. Anyone who reads only two or three of yours will know that you can't be taken seriously in this forum.
817 posted on 07/10/2003 9:56:12 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Every singele post like this gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. Think of the thousands of people who stopped by to read this article because a handful of potheads don't know when to cut their losses.
818 posted on 07/10/2003 9:57:24 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]

To: toothless
"No, dane is more logical."

That is a disturbing thought. But I think you may be right.

819 posted on 07/10/2003 9:57:48 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Riiiight. So alcohol and pot are the same thing again?
820 posted on 07/10/2003 9:58:34 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800801-820821-840 ... 1,661-1,662 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson