Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala's VP model stepdaughter Ella Emhoff bares boobs as she walks down NYC runway in VERY daring scarf and microskirt combo
daily mail ^

Posted on 09/11/2022 9:45:35 AM PDT by algore

Vice President Kamala Harris' model stepdaughter Ella Emhoff bared her boobs while walking the runway at a New York Fashion Week show Saturday.

Emhoff, who is the daughter of US second gentleman Doug Emhoff and first wife, Kerstin Emhoff, wore a barely-there mint blouse and a black leather lambskin miniskirt with black gloves for the outing.

The outfit appeared to be a deliberate choice, and there's no suggestion the bared boobs were a wardrobe malfunction.

The designer told The Associated Press he discovered an industrial space in the former home of the Japanese consulate while on a bike ride on Manhattan's East Side. He turned it into a white runway that made his revealing metallics, bondage looks, and neon brights pop.

'I wanted to create a space for this particular show where we felt what we are feeling in the culture itself: Kind of unsure politically, culturally, but we still want to be hopeful, want to be optimistic,' he said.

'I needed to be near the reminder of the UN that our job in fashion is not done until we are alert and vigilant

Meanwhile, Ella, 22, skyrocketed into fashion fame when she wore a Miu Miu tartan coat with crystal-encrusted shoulders and a wide collar over a burgundy Batsheva dress during President Joe Biden's inauguration in January 2021.

She then made her runway debut at the Proenza Schouler show during New York Fashion Week in early 2021, after signing with modeling agency IMG.

At the time, IMG president Ivan Bart gushed that she represented 'authenticity,' telling the New York Times, 'Ella communicates this moment in time. There's a cheekiness and a joy she exudes.'

Some unkind commenters claimed that Ella's illustrious family background and ultra-famous stepmom helped turbocharge her modeling career

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: dougemhoff; ellaemhoff; ibtz; kamala; kamalaharris; kerstinemhoff; laz; nothanks; poortaste; slutsandnuts; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: Persevero

You are too far removed.

Modern women today want to behave this way. They enjoy riding a bunch of guys for 10-20 years, then wonder why no one they want, wants to marry them and save them from their decades of bad choices, that they will not admit responsibility for.

They know why.


101 posted on 09/11/2022 12:56:35 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: algore

Not even interested in looking.


102 posted on 09/11/2022 1:10:39 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

To be fair, the models don’t generally choose what they wear, and if you refuse a high-profile contract, you never work again.

Oh, well. I didn’t even know Kamala was married, to be honest. I doubt many knew who she was related to.


103 posted on 09/11/2022 1:23:03 PM PDT by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

Looks more like a trans than a model.


104 posted on 09/11/2022 1:33:29 PM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so bad that the federal government can not make worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

Tatoos on an attractive woman are hideous.


105 posted on 09/11/2022 1:36:12 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Remember August 8!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

It looks to me in the photo like she has an Adam’s apple. Maybe it’s just a bad photo.

And yes, she looks creepy.


106 posted on 09/11/2022 2:15:33 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Thank God


107 posted on 09/11/2022 2:28:13 PM PDT by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I know plenty of women who are not as you describe.

However they are daughters, relatives, and associated with our church whether directly or indirectly.

My sons and daughters have mostly married early and are having kids and establishing households together. “Modern women” is a misnomer, although I understand your meaning - they are just lost women, sinful women, and what is sad to me, badly reared young women. They will suffer. It is very sad to me.

Like seeing a young man glued to a video game for inordinate amounts of time, or staggering around high, or hooked on porn. It’s a tragic waste.


108 posted on 09/11/2022 2:33:02 PM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Its not a misnomer.

Its a generality that is apporpriate because the majority of them fit the generality. Its why its a term and its a generally accurate term.


109 posted on 09/11/2022 2:45:06 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

It adds nothing and only detracts.

Alex Baldwin has a very pretty daughter except for the tats.
Same with Michael Jackson’s daughter.

Makes them look cheap.


110 posted on 09/11/2022 2:46:14 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Well, we disagree.

A modern woman is someone born maybe from the 1960s to the 2000s.

The plurality of them are married, to a man, with kids. So I don’t think saying that most modern women want to abuse men’s hearts and wallet and then discover themselves alone and ruined at 60 is true. Many who are not married (like a daughter of mine) are still of the right mindset. Many who are divorced (like friends of mine) are divorced due to infidelity on the husband’s part. Not majority harlots.

There is a good sized subset that behave as you describe. It is post modern philosophy to do so. But the majority of women aren’t actually on the screeching feminist trail.


111 posted on 09/11/2022 2:52:16 PM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: algore

The fashion industry is a sick industry.


112 posted on 09/11/2022 2:55:00 PM PDT by Wuli (uires )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore
The outfit appeared to be a deliberate choice,

Newsflash to the cognitively impaired.

Nobody dresses like that by accident.

113 posted on 09/11/2022 4:04:39 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Oh, dear God…….


114 posted on 09/11/2022 4:06:26 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: algore

Another example of “we are going to poke it in your eye when we put these disasters in the White House.”


115 posted on 09/11/2022 4:08:58 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Your flaw is “modern woman” doesn’t mean “screeching feminist”.

But I’m done talking about it.


116 posted on 09/11/2022 4:36:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: algore

I would have to e really drunk to hit that, drunk enough to have her arrested for date rape.


117 posted on 09/11/2022 6:06:56 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Sadly she isn’t much to look at.


118 posted on 09/11/2022 6:09:42 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

“Emhoff, who is the daughter of US second gentleman Doug Emhoff “

Huh?


119 posted on 09/12/2022 4:22:17 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Why are you sending this to ME? I never posted anything about Doug Emhoff.


120 posted on 09/12/2022 7:13:50 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson