Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heidi Cruz: Betrayed by Cheating Husband..4 mil divorce explodes..threesomes/sleazy letters/proof
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TedCruzSexScandal?src=hash ^ | next weeks edition April 15, 2016

Posted on 04/10/2016 4:46:48 PM PDT by drewh

plus 'sensational photo proof'


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; baaardtheguardsman; cds; cruzisobama2; dcmadam; drewh; drinkthetrumpcoolaid; dumptrump; garbage; globalistcruz; ihazapotato; incestuousted; lookatmytweets; lyinted; merrickgarlandlvscrz; moretrumplies; noteligiblecruz; notnews; openboarderscruz; stopthesteal; trumpanzies; trumpdisease; trumplies; twittertrash; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last
To: Bruce Campbells Chin

....” this kind of slow leak of “secret evidence” out there should annoy any decent person because it’s the kind of stuff Democrats usually do to destroy Republicans”......

It’s done because it always works to feed those who love a scandal. Demorats always use “sexual scandals” because they know what offends Republicans. It doesn’t make a difference to them because they have no morals.


61 posted on 04/10/2016 5:20:19 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Have you checked some of the people posting this garbage? Sounds like something Sid Blumenthal would do. Really, unless and until there is some verification, this is wholly inappropriate - the man has two young children. This is like the trash that was thrown at Andrew Jackson’s wife Rachel; she was mortified and died of it.


62 posted on 04/10/2016 5:22:33 PM PDT by laconic (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

‘BAT BOY: ‘I AM TED CRUZ’S LOVE CHILD!’’

You’re mistaken. Cruz spoke of copulating with rats, not bats.


63 posted on 04/10/2016 5:23:15 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: caww
Exactly.

I don't want to see either Trump or Cruz further smeared or damaged in this primary process. I'm not thrilled with either of the two guys remaining, but I'm voting for whomever the nominee is because the alternative is simply worse.

We have been in this circular firing squad for months now, in an election that the Democrats simply cannot win. And every day of this nastiness just makes that more and more likely.

64 posted on 04/10/2016 5:23:39 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Speaking about shame,you back a liar,cheater,money grubbing,philanderer,fake conservative, who has absolutely no shame. What does that make you?


65 posted on 04/10/2016 5:23:54 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

Which is enough to make you wonder if this is a plant from the Cruz team. It is a known political tactic—the Clintons used it to great success—to plant an exaggeration of a charge, have that debunked, and thereby develop immunity against accusations of the actual truth, were they to emerge.


66 posted on 04/10/2016 5:25:02 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
He wouldn't exactly be the first hypocritical politicians, or the first politician to cheat on his wife

To be completely frank I'd still vote for Trump if these sleazy accusations were made about him and it was discovered that some of it was true... so I don't reject Cruz because of this, I reject him because he is unfit to serve for other reasons.

Cruz just wants it too badly... he seems to be willing to abandon all principles to win.

I don't really expect ANY politician to be completely innocent...I'm a realist, not a moron.

67 posted on 04/10/2016 5:25:54 PM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Good memory.


68 posted on 04/10/2016 5:26:59 PM PDT by CARTOUCHE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: corbe

Gee you hate strong women don’t you? You haveu are certainly a Scruzer. Rude,nasty,incompetent.


69 posted on 04/10/2016 5:27:52 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Really, unless and until there is some verification, this is wholly inappropriate - the man has two young children. This is like the trash that was thrown at Andrew Jackson’s wife Rachel; she was mortified and died of it.

Thank you for posting that. I don't know why so many people who probably like to think of themselves as good people would think it is so funny to throw around these kind of unsupported smears.

If they turn out to be supported smears, then we've got to deal with that, and that will be ugly. Some innocent people wil unfortunately be hurt, but that's unavoidable.

But spreading around these kind of smears now is completely avoidable at this point.

70 posted on 04/10/2016 5:28:05 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I’m active on Twitter and there have been a number of fake Trump accounts exposed as Cruz supporters in actuality, posting rumors and lies to catch the Trump people. I’m sure it works the other way too sometimes.

There’s one way to avoid any of that mess - simply don’t believe or pass on anything you read until you’ve checked it yourself.


71 posted on 04/10/2016 5:28:22 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Lawyer logic and tactics.
Better call Saul.


72 posted on 04/10/2016 5:28:43 PM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
So you're also one of those people who doesn't care if there is any actual evidence?

Nice smokescreen.

The "Selective Outrage" card was directed at all of those people who are running to their fainting couches over this mocking of Ted Cruz, after they have completely ignored all of the sleazy things that he has done to other candidates during the course of this campaign.

Last time I looked, people are free to cast aspersions on a hypocrite - especially a political one, which is what this thread is about. People have mocked politicians for centuries.

But of course, you go ahead and post a tirade about moral outrage over "lack of evidence". We will continue to deride Ted Cruz and his abject hypocrisy.

73 posted on 04/10/2016 5:29:09 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (The GOPe deserve nothing more than a middle finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Perhaps “it” is actually a classy green-eyed blonde.


74 posted on 04/10/2016 5:29:42 PM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Cruz forgets he’s married.

Yep. If he can't be loyal to his cousin, how will he be loyal to Canada the US.
75 posted on 04/10/2016 5:29:52 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
I might vote for either of them as well. Not sure I can let my own opinion on the sanctity of marriage trump (pun intended) what is good for the country. But the fact is that if the allegations about either of them were true, it would probably eliminate any chance that candidate had to win the general election.

I just don't understand the mindset of people who apparently think it is funny to post this kind of stuff. As if that is a worthy level of debate for the world's oldest democracy.

76 posted on 04/10/2016 5:31:12 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Do you mean Canada?
77 posted on 04/10/2016 5:31:49 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin
Perhaps “it” is actually a classy green-eyed blonde.

Well, I think that's one thing we can safely say is not true, because anyone falsely trying to portray themselves as an army officer is not "classy" by definition.

78 posted on 04/10/2016 5:32:49 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
You're obviously free to say whatever you want if it amuses you. But it is utterly classless to do so given the lack of any real evidence, especially considering that his wife and particularly his children are probably getting these kind of smears thrown in their faces.

You're not helping your candidate, but then, maybe that's not your goal anyway.

79 posted on 04/10/2016 5:35:57 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
You're not helping your candidate...

And who would that be?

80 posted on 04/10/2016 5:37:09 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (The GOPe deserve nothing more than a middle finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson