To: PeaRidge; DiogenesLamp; Bull Snipe; HandyDandy; jmacusa
PeaRidge:
"If you want to use the year 1860, your figure of import value of $362 million is the amount reported to Treasury as recorded at the ports, but only $268 million of those goods were dutible, or in other words subject to the duty prescribed by Federal Law." Like I said, if you exclude this or add that, you can make those numbers say whatever you wish.
However, you need to think very carefully about the claim made by pro-Confederates, then and now.
Their claim goes like this:
- Yes, there is no duty on exports, but only exports can pay for imports on which there are Federal tariffs.
- Exports of cotton in 1860 were circa $191 million.
These helped to pay for a total of $362 million worth of imports on which the Federal government collected average 15% tariffs, totaling $52 million.
- Since cotton's $191 million in exports helped support all $362 million in imports, it's fair to say cotton paid 53% of total 1860 Federal tariff revenues of $52 million.
It's certainly not fair to say that cotton exports only paid for dutiable imports, when in fact, all exports helped pay for both dutiable and non-dutiable imports.
Here is a source for tariff & revenues data
217 posted on
01/21/2016 4:50:33 PM PST by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective...)
To: BroJoeK; DiogenesLamp; central_va; rustbucket; DomainMaster
Brojoke
Your post #217.......
I am not the one here attempting to use data....you are.
And again I am telling you that you are using the wrong data.
There were other Lincoln apologists that posted here like #3Fan and WhiskeyPapa that when in error would post all sorts of babble to cover up.....and you are doing exactly the same thing.
Grow up.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson