Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK; DiogenesLamp; central_va; rustbucket; DomainMaster
Brojoke

Your post #217.......

I am not the one here attempting to use data....you are.

And again I am telling you that you are using the wrong data.

There were other Lincoln apologists that posted here like #3Fan and WhiskeyPapa that when in error would post all sorts of babble to cover up.....and you are doing exactly the same thing.

Grow up.

232 posted on 01/22/2016 5:43:41 AM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: PeaRidge; DiogenesLamp; central_va; rustbucket; DomainMaster
PeaRidge: "I am not the one here attempting to use data....you are."

But of course, you are attempting to use data to exaggerate the importance of Southern cash-crops like cotton to the entire US economy, and to Federal revenues.
That's what this whole discussion is all about.

So I'm certainly not denying the importance of cotton, simply trying to put it into its proper perspective.
The fact is that cotton exports of $191 million in 1860 were enough to pay for 53% of total imports of $362 million.
Since the overall tariff rate in 1860 was roughly 15%, that generated Federal tariff revenues of $52 million.

Those are facts, which you can only obfuscate by adding this or deleting that.
Of course, I agree that cotton was not the South's only export.
Tobacco & other products paid for additional 5%+ of imports, making the total approximately 60% of US 1860 imports paid for by Southern cash-crops.

So what, exactly, is your problem with this?

PeaRidge: "Grow up."

Grow up.

235 posted on 01/22/2016 7:02:15 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson