Posted on 04/09/2013 1:15:12 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Girl Guides have thrown their support behind the “No More Page 3” campaign, in a bid to stop the perpetuation of the idea that “women are objects” in a family newspaper.
Girlguiding UK has signed the campaign to try and force the hand of Rupert Murdoch, who hinted a few weeks ago that he is considering ending the publication of photographs of topless models on page 3 of The Sun—which he owns, as chief executive of News Corporation. …
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
what gets me is women want to be page 3 gals. they volunteer, nobody forces them. guess women can’t make that choice.
Little busy bodies need to mind their business.
Couldn't have said it better myself, ROTFLMAO!
No pictures?
Why don't they take up the cause of changing how Muslims in Britain treat women? That would be a far more tangible cause with benefits. Of course, that would be a bit more dangerous and require courage.
Yep ... This from a bunch that hustles their cookies for cash ....
Wow,
I applaud the girls for having the moral fiber to not want to be part of Page 3 (even if qualified).
But as a sexist male, I hope she fails.
As the saying goes, “Once a man sees a woman naked, he wants to see them all naked”
I wonder if the Muzzies were the ones who started the call to end the Page Three girls.
Booo.
Not ALL of ‘em. Not the First Wookkiee, and certainly not Col. Hillary Klebb.
Samantha Fox was hot when I was a teenager (so was she). She started out as a “Page 3” girl.
Didn’t she go lesbo?
Pics or it didn’t happen. ;)
Women aren’t objects? Clearly I misunderstand the definition of “object”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.