Interview with Virgil Goode: How Do We Elevate Constitutional Principles?

Forbes ^ | 28 Aug 12 | Bill Flax

[xzins]

...Virgil Goode has long supported a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, which recently cleared the House. He advocates “currency that is real and backed by gold or silver.”

Goode champions “fair and equitable opportunity, but it’s up to you to use it. Government cannot ensure equal results because every individual differs;”

An ardent proponent of balancing the budget, our deficits Goode insists, stem from “spending.” “Taxes should be simple and fair … I’m not for increasing income taxes; if we even have an income tax.”

The candidate laments “too much federal involvement in our lives” offering as an example the Department of Education, “should not be involved, schooling should be determined by states and localities …

“Government forcibly redefining marriage to include anything other than one man and one woman would be totally foreign to the views of the framers of the Constitution, first ten amendments and Declaration of Independence.”

Goode denies that the Founders, men of “deep-seated values,” would consider a cross on the town square or the Ten Commandments posted at school “as un-constitutional... public displays “aren’t forcing religion on anyone,

He adamantly opposed our Libyan debacle

Goode implores “following the Constitution, we can’t let the UN decide” clarifying “I don’t mind working with allies like we did in World War One and Two, but I’d never let U.S. troops serve under UN command. ...

“I’m totally opposed to illegal immigration and will put a moratorium on new Green Cards until unemployment reduces. Jobs should [go] to U.S. citizens first.” Goode would “eliminate automatic birthright citizenship”

Going the third party route is admittedly precarious ... unless living in a key battleground state, it’s unlikely your vote matters much. Likewise, for the many voters (that) might stay home, pulling the lever for Goode seems sound.

[Gilbo_3]

Have a great weekend.

you too Brother...!!!

[stephenjohnbanker]

” if i thought i had any real ability to alter the Plan of God, as i used to, Id be a fool...”

Been there, tried that : )

” carry the Word, no matter the temporal situation”

Temporal is right. The miserably short span of human life is hard to take. I’m 58, a few weeks ago, I was 18. : )

Have a great weekend.

[sickoflibs]

RE :”bad, bad is right SOL...first she'd hafta figure out where the pantry is”

When their chef is sick they have to find a 5 star restaurant to eat at or starve. Think she knows where the microwave is?

You should see what a tizzy they go into over jokes like that. (Just today about 4 of them went for it.) You would think Ann is the Momma Grizzly or something

[ex-snook]

"I've watched what this guy has done already, and it really is a fearful thing, much like what Hitler, Stalin, Castro, and Chavez did in their countries in their early years"

You could use some anti-alarmist fear pills. We don't live in a dictatorship. We vote.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” When their chef is sick they have to find a 5 star restaurant to eat at or starve.”

If one is ready to faint from hunger, one needs a 2 inch cut Beef Wellington, and a lobster tail. C’mon.....EVERYBODY knows that!

[stephenjohnbanker]

” We don’t live in a dictatorship. We vote. “

I’m not an expert at anything but finance. Obama has set the stage to collapse the economy. He has provided for every contingency....every T crossed, every I dotted. I’m sure Boehner will stop Obama’s DAILY Executive Orders/s

[ex-snook]

" Obama has set the stage to collapse the economy,"

With all due respect, why the hell would Obama [Democrats] want to collapse the economy? That sounds like what some international financier might try to short the dollar. BTW - We have just about collapsed our economy now in trade agreements. Have you been looking at where the products you buy, are made? Why do you think Romney talks about 25,000,000 looking for work?

[DoughtyOne]

There were a lot of comments on this thread.  I'm sure some of them were great.  These two posts touched on the dilema Christians, Conservatives, Republicans, and the rest of Citizens of the Uhited States face when determining what they will do concerning the Presidential candidates we consider voting for this November 6th.  I will address points made by these two people with opposing opinions.

Although I have come to the same end conclusion that SoConPubbie has ultimately come to, it's not for the same reasons.  I'll touch on that at the end of my comments.

To: stephenjohnbanker; mkjessup; xzins; VinL; ex-snook; sport; INVAR; ejonesie22; PieterCasparzen; ...

    Here is your problem. We are voting for a politician, not Jesus Christ.(in Romneys case voting against Obama, not for Romney)

    First of all, sorry for being so tardy replying to you. I can't post at work and had to go to my kid's school Open House after work.
    Now, with regards to your previous post, No Stephen, that is not the issue for Christians.  Issue 01
    Nowhere in the Bible did God, His Prophets, Christ, or his Apostles declare that his commands were situational. In fact, quite the opposite is true. He demands 100% of our will, not 90%, not 95%, not even 99%. We can't pick and choose the situations that we are going to apply God's laws and commands to; it does not matter if you actually believe or fear that Obama has the power to bring this nation to it's knees. What matters, if we are truly Christians, is that we obey God.
    You cannot compartmentalize your Christianity or apply filters to which scenario you remain loyal to Christ and those you will not be loyal to Christ.  Issue 02
    If Millions of Christians over the centuries have chosen to remain true to Christ, even in the face of certain death because they refused to recant their faith in God, how can you and I as Conservative Christians throw away our faith by supporting a man who knowingly supports what he knows is evil, the Abortion of Babies and the Homosexual agenda even if we fear the damage that Obama might do?  Issue 03
    Is your faith in a political party or is it in an Almighty, ALL-KNOWING God?  Issue 04
    Christianity was never meant to be partial or situational.  Issue 05
    Voting for Romney, when he supports the murders of babies and the Abomination of the Gay Agenda puts you in the place of doing just that.  Issue 06

159 posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:35:42 PM by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)  


To: SoConPubbie; mkjessup; xzins; VinL; ex-snook; sport; INVAR; ejonesie22; PieterCasparzen; onyx

    Nowhere in the Bible did God, His Prophets, Christ, or his Apostles declare that his commands were situational. In fact, quite the opposite is true. He demands 100% of our will, not 90%, not 95%, not even 99%. We can’t pick and choose the situations that we are going to apply God’s laws and commands to; it does not matter if you actually believe or fear that Obama has the power to bring this nation to it’s knees. What matters, if we are truly Christians, is that we obey God.  You cannot compartmentalize your Christianity or apply filters to which scenario you remain loyal to Christ and those you will not be loyal to Christ.

    My! I guess that due to the fact that Americans can be just like Christ, there was really no reason for Him to die on that cross.  Issue 07  I suppose we just have to bite the bullet, and allow the Muslim Communist to destroy our country(the last real bastion of Christianity and world-wide Christian evangelism, mind you).  Issue 08
    As for “compartmentalized Christianity” by chance, did you vote for Ronald Reagan?  Issue 09  Do you realize that in spite of his Christianity, he was divorced, and had sex outside of marriage a few times?  Issue 10  You keep trying to equate Christianity with politicians, and it won’t work. Politicians are sinful, fallible human beings.  Issue 11
    If you want reductio ad absurdum, as Christians, should we not open our borders to every poor person.....you know,including Muslim Underground psychos, and Somali pirates? Surely, we can handle 300 million extra Chinese peasants, and 300 million poor street urchins from India. Have you emptied your checking and savings accounts, sold your home, and given it all to the poor?  Issue 12
    Look, I despise Romney, but we have a situation whereby a single man will destroy this country, if he is not stopped.  Issue 13  That leaves us a terribly flawed man to stop the communist onslaught.  Issue 14  You say it is God’s will that we allow western civilization to collapse, because Romney is a sinner.  Issue 15  Jesus spent most of his time with the worst of us, and died on the cross TO SAVE ALL OF US.  Issue 16  You are not saved by allowing the destruction of America, indeed western civilization, and the last real hope of the spreading of Christianity throughout the world.  Issue 17  You are saved by God’s Grace.  Live with it,  Issue 18  and quit trying to play God.  He has no equal.  Issue 19

177 posted on Friday, August 31, 2012 11:03:07 AM by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)

Issue 01:  Actually, SoConPubbie, it is a part of what we need to take into account leading up to November 6th, 2012.  There is a strong moral decision to be made here.  Both these men have supported abortion.  Both of them have pushed other Leftist policy.  No man is perfect.  What it all comes down to for some people is, which man is better?  We all detest Obama.  What if our nation was attacked.  Would we refuse his call for us to defend our nation based on his unacceptable political priorities?  Well our nation is under attack.  Are we going to refuse Romney's call for us to defend our nation based on his unacceptable political priorities?  If we allow this nation to fall, is there no moral complicity?  Would this not be considered a sin, considering what this nation has always stood for, that no other nation has?  Would the God who blessed our nation formed as a result of the search for Religious Liberty, truly want us to stand by idly and watch it go down without taking part to prevent it?  Agree with this argument or not, it is a valid argument to make, and good men of all stripes must contemplate it.

Issue 02:  Sounds real good, until you consider that all men are sinful.  Sounds real good until you realize that even God backs sinners against other sinners.  Does that mean that God is compartmentalizing His Perfection?  There are some agruments I wouldn't make.  In your comments under Issue 02, you made some I wouldn't have.  Does that mean I am in conflict with God.  Since he does back certain sinners against others, I don't believe so.  Once again, this may not be a compelling enough argument for some people.  It's still a valid argument.  It is something to think about.  Did God continue to bless David after his sins?  As a matter of fact, for a long time He did.  David had ordered the murder of a adult man, a husband.  For the good of Israel as a whole, he allowed David to remain king and a strong king.  He also saw to it that David was able to hand down his kingdom to his son.  Was this God compartmentalizing?

Issue 03:  In your statement I have labeled Issue 03, you try to compare a person's peronal stand based on their own beliefs where they are the only person at stake, with one where a person has to evaluate two levels of evil to make a decision about a collective choice to block the worst one.  In one instance, the person is making a moral stand that will only cost their own life.  In the other, the person is making a moral decision concerning the life of a nation containing 310 million lives.  It's not really the same thing.  And no, you can't just glibly retort that it really is.  No, making a decision that only impacts you, is not the same as making a decision where hundreds of millions of other people will have to suffer the consequences of your decision.  I'm not convinced God would view them the same.  It's up to other Christians to contemplate this.  It's not a black and white issue.

Issue 04:  Faith is a interesting word.  One moment it can be used in conjunction with God, and the next it can be used in conjunction with a person many of us thinks of as an agent of supreme evil.  I have faith that God will ultimately do right by us.  I have faith that God will destroy evil.  I also have faith that Barack Obama will institute new levels of evil in his second term.  I have faith that many U. S. Citizens will be harmed by his efforts.  Sadly, I have faith that Mitt Romney will also do harm.  I just have faith that he will do less harm.  Now, does God expect us to ensure that less harm comes to our nation?  I'm not totally convinced He doesn't.  Good thinking people will contemplate this, as they make up their minds this year.

Issue 05:  Except that God Himself chooses to support men who are sinners.   I think I'm rather safe thinking that God is not sinning by doing so.  Perhaps you have better inside information.

Issue 06:  What's this, the third or forth time you've said/asked the same thing?  Well nevermind, lets move on.  One hundred thousand men women and children are located in a valley.  A formidable enemy is approaching and only two generals are available to lead.  One is a complete imbecile, incapable of leading, and his selection would mean all would be lost.  Every man woman and child would die.  The other general is quite good.  Losses would still occur, but those losses would be far less.  Oh, and both men are evil sinful people.  Should the populace refuse to back either general to lead their forces?  After all, Christianity IS NOT situational.  Should the good these one hundred thousand people and their progeny would do down through eternity, be eliminated so they can avoid compartmentalization of their Christianity?

I appreciate your point of view, but I remain unconvinced your arguments hold water, even if your ulimate decision is the same as mine.

Issue 07:  Romney is far enough from the perfection model, that I'm not sure this is the correct argument to make.  I say that with some reservation too.  For all that I consider to be his human failings, I do think Romney is to be admired for some things.  His family seems to be a solid one.  His kids seem to respect him.  His wife obviously does.  His grand-kids do.  When I take a look at that family, I am moved to think he did some things very right.  I obviously don't think he's pefect.  And I obviously don't think we should wait for some WHO IS to come along.  None the less, we can do a hell of a lot better than this.

Issue 08:  I think that is a powerful argument.  It is something that must be considered.  IMO, it was something God had to contemplate when he blessed Israel in battle, despite King David's failings.

Issue 09:  Oh man, I sure don't like where this seems to be heading...

Issue 10:  Oooppp!!!  I may be too old school for this, but I don't like doing the Left's work for it, tearing down Reagan to make someone else look better.  That is precisely what they do.  Now some of us do it too.  IMO, we shouldn't... EVER!  When temped to go in this direction, don't.  When tempted to go in this direction, go in another.  No Reagan wasn't pefect, but he was a damn good man.  Picking the bones of a good man, is no way to make a point.  It merely deminishes a person we should encourage people to emulate.

Issue 11:  The comparison doesn't bother me, because politicians are not the only ones who are fallible human beings.  So are Christians.  I just think it's imperative we remember that at all times.

Issue 12:  I agree with this line of reasoning.  Some Christian absolutists would agree we should liquidate all that we have and give it to the poor.  The end conclusion of that is that in short order we would all be poor.  And then there would be nobody of means left to help any of us.  That's not what God desires.  We are to minister to our families, as He does the church.  Would God advocate we liquidate all church assets and give it to the poor?  No.  Should we then liquidate all family assets?  No.  MODERATION in ALL things...  Joseph had an obligation to house and provide for Mary and Jesus.  I think your comments were quite sound here.

Issue 13:  I tend to agree, but then I tended to agree that Bill Clinton would too.  Are we right here, or is this another instance where we're going overboard?  I do have concerns about this aspect of Obama.

Issue 14:  I'm not convinced you or anyone is wrong that is making this case.

Issue 15:  I agree that is one possible implication.  It's also an implication that it is flat wrong to support evil of that level.  I honestly don't see this is as cut and dried as either side thinks.

Issue 16:  Jesus did spend some time with some pretty shadey people.  I think He spent most of his time with your average human sinner though.  He obviously spent some time with very good people too.  He did die for them all.  He forgave a murderer and promised salvation on the cross.  It almost makes you think that under some circumstances Mitt Romey might get the same attention.  It's part of the reason why I don't trash Romney as if he has no redeeming value.  We all have some redeeming values.  We all have some damning values.  God will sort that out in time.  I am led to believe this world would be a lot better place, if we all spent 1/1000th as much time on our own salvation, that we do on other's.  This is not meant to absolve Romney for the just rewards of life decisions, and that justifiably impacts our decisions at times like this.

Issue 17:  I agree with that.

Issue 18:  Yes, we hope to be saved by God's grace.  In the meantime we must remember that we will not be saved by doing any evil we desire, then claiming salvation through faith.  If we are truly repentant, and followers of God, we will live the best lives we can.  When contemplating the evil of others as well as ourselves, I think it's important to remember Saul.  Saul was engaged in killing as many Christians as he could.  Then God revealed himself to Saul, and the sinner became a champion of God doing the exact opposite of what he had been doing before.  That is the miracle of Christianity.  Too many of us Christians would have cut Saul off at the knees.  God, for whatever reason, found it a better object lesson to convert him so thoroughly that he changed his name to Paul, and led out in His efforts.  Can Mitt Romney experience a Saul/Paul moment?  Is our faith in God strong enough to believe it?  It should be, with some real world reservations that it would happen.

Issue 19:  No, we are not God, and should not pretend to know His complete understanding.

+  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +

Ultimately, I am not convinced God wants us to back Mitt Romney.  There are short term and long term ramifications of a decision either way on this.  Do we allow the Left to destroy their credibilty for all time?  Do we allow Romney to go in and continue on with deficit spending for years to come?  Do we allow him to replace one government health care plan with his own favorite?  Do we allow a man who supports same sex marriage to govern this nation?

As Christians, this is not an easy choice.

To date, I still cannot back Mitt Romney.         

[stephenjohnbanker]

” With all due respect, why the hell would Obama [Democrats] want to collapse the economy? “

Because they want to control the masses, and own their vote. Check what the number of welfare recipients and food stamp recipients were in the beginning of 2009-versus today.

” That sounds like what some international financier might try to short the dollar.”

Just take a guess why George Soro’s net worth has close to doubled over the past few years.

” BTW - We have just about collapsed our economy now in trade agreements. Have you been looking at where the products you buy, are made?”

Why do you think China is openly endorsing Obama, and trashing Romney?

” Why do you think Romney talks about 25,000,000 looking for work? “

If you include “underemployed” that number approaches 40 million.

[Deb]

How can someone who quotes so much scripture, support a man who calls for the abandonment of Israel? One of the many things Goode and Ron Paul agree on is the end to all aid and support of Israel.

I don't understand how any of you Constitution Party followers can be so blind.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” Oh man, I sure don’t like where this seems to be heading...

Issue 10: Oooppp!!! I may be too old school for this, but I don’t like doing the Left’s work for it, tearing down Reagan to make someone else look better. That is precisely what they do. Now some of us do it too. IMO, we shouldn’t... EVER! When temped to go in this direction, don’t. When tempted to go in this direction, go in another. No Reagan wasn’t pefect, but he was a damn good man. Picking the bones of a good man, is no way to make a point. It merely deminishes a person we should encourage people to emulate”

My point was that if one expects 100% purity, even the great Ronald Reagan should not be voted for. In fact, we shouldn’t vote for any politician, according to SoCon’s reasoning. By the way, I worked for Reagan at his Century City offices both times. He was the only true leader we had in my 58 years on earth.

[stephenjohnbanker]

I won’t be around for the weekend, but your long and thoughtful response warrants much more comment from me. I will do so, when I return. Thanks again.

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you.

[Lakeshark]

Anti-alarmist fear pills? What planet have you been on while the US has slowly been destroyed by this administration? Our businesses can't move without the blessing of the administration, they want to pick the winners and losers in every field of business (aka crony capitalism), they simply write executive orders in areas they have no right to be in, they have devalued the dollar about a third, they pulled amnesty with an executive order, they control the banks, they have voted to control the health care industry, they've destroyed our alliances, emboldened our enemies, and have contempt for the rights and values of over half the US citizenry. I could go on for a page and it wouldn't be exaggerating, like I say, what planet have you been on lately?

Germany, Russia, Cuba, and Venezuela all had the right to vote as well before these people you shouldn't fear took over. Has it eluded you how much this piece of crap emulates and admires these heroes of his and their "ideological progress"?

Fear? You betcha. If you aren't fearful of what this bunch has done and will do, you haven't been paying attention.

[stephenjohnbanker]

One of the things Obama will do, is snatch your IRA’s, and
other savings, and tax-deferred financial instruments, and issue you an IOU for it, with maybe 3% interest(think you’ll ever see your principal again?)He will also create a 5-6% FORCED RETIREMENT withheld from your paycheck. This will be in addition to your social security, again with an IOU. The Wall Street Journal, and other paid financial publications have written about this.
Get ready for another Executive Order.

[xzins]

Allowing an avowed Marxist, a slick atheistic, muzzie leaning enemy of all things good and right, one who clearly against all you love and believe in to win again as a result of some purity test

It is hardly a purity test, SJ and Lake. The expression "purity test" implies a picayne attitude. However, these things with Romney -- abortion, gay couples, gay adoption, gay scouts, gay military -- are the most basic of Christian principles that would be violated by supporting Mitt Romney for those of us who see it that way.

[xzins]

Yes, Deb, you make an honest point. Romney is better on Israel than is Obama.

I’ve had to work through that. Jeremiah’s mission within Jerusalem is the answer.

But, that doesn’t change the fact that you make a good point. My reading says that Netanyahu and Romney are more than acquaintances for quite a while. Netanyahu has always been a favorite of mine.

[xzins]

And that’s your right, MKJ. And mine is to stand for a different viewpoint.

[xzins]

The commandment actually says: You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

How is hiding a Jew bearing false witness against your neighbor?

That would be saying to the IRS about your neighbor who you secretly hate, “He is cheating on his taxes” when you either don’t have a clue or know that it is not true.

Truth, on the other hand, is a bit more complex. What did Jesus say when they asked Him if it was OK to pay taxes to Caesar?

[Impy]

I’m not religious so I can’t speak to all the finer points of the Bible, the last time I was in a church was when my mom begged me to go with her to some Christmas music thing.

But look, our house is on fire. The only bucket of water is the nominee of the Republican party. And it’s it Romney so it’s more like a bucket of pee and the house is gonna stink but the immediate concern is the fire.

And I’m a guy who hates our last RINO President and have wondered out loud if maybe it would have been better if he had not gotten another term.

No matter what Romney does I doubt it will be so damaging that I look back and wish Obama had won. If it is I’ll eat crow but right now I can’t breath in here, the fire has to be put out.