Posted on 07/31/2010 9:37:35 PM PDT by Polarik
OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)
Play that "funky border," white boy... Ever wonder how or why that UGLY, GRAYISH-GREEN BORDER wound up on Obama's 2007 COLB? I mean, besides it being a forgery. Well, wonder no longer. After two years of research and testing - and a few thousand combinations of multiple image parameters - here are the answers to HOW and WHY this BOMBASTIC BORDER was made.
Believe it or not, even a few, staunch Obama supporters found the border to be "Fishy," "Suspicious," "Unrealistic," and "Something a decent Forger would never do."
On the contrary, the Forger who made this Border was both decent and devilishly clever. He or she fabricated a border unlike any other, and unable to be discerned or duplicated by anyone. Until now, that is. As you will see from my latest video, It took a lot of time to do the crime (of document fraud). Like the three other instructional videos on my channel, I have assembled a set of step-by-step instructions on how to recreate this border. As you perform the rather complex process of replicating the border, or just watching the steps unfold, it should be self-evident that this border could only have been made by a human, and not a scanner. Obama's Border Troubles is the fourth and final installment in the set of instructional videos that I have provided for accurately recreating the Obama COLB forgery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxd0kQla3FA
http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP
1905. Geez...
“Parsey left???”
Back in May. We didn’t even get a decent opus. : (
Parsy’s farewell: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2513818/posts?page=517#517
“Lets have some fun and play like Polarik.”
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/so-sad-passportgate-and-open-thread/
So S. Ann Soetoro wanted to exclude little Soebarkah from her passport.
Did someone later on, perhaps decades later, write Barack Hussein Obama above Soebarkah, put parentheses around the Indonesian name, and then cross out the entire thing?
Did page 2 originally say ONLY Soebarkahthe name of the child she wanted excluded from her 1965 passport?
What was his name in 1968?
Did S. Ann Soetoro exclude him from her passport because he had his very own Indonesian passport that he could use?
Is that why, when she tried to bring him back in 1971, she had to request a waiver to enter the country with him?
Because he was no longer on her passport?
***
Pure speculation, of course.
But where Obama eligibility is concerned, what choice do we have but to speculate?
And I’m guessing Obama wants us to look everywhere EXCEPT where we s/b looking.
He's not insane, at least not in the functional sense. He simply is demonstrating the sociopathic qualities con men demonstrate in pursuing their ends. Because the key to the con is simply gutting it out. Lie and lie and lie, but never blink. Eventually, honest people are so flabbergasted, because they would never do something like that, that a sliver of self-doubt or embarrassment will create an opening for the con man to either extricate himself or close the deal.
That's what they do. That's why you have to seriously prep yourself for one in court, so you're ready to close off all the possible lies one by one until they're just sitting there exposed, drying out like the turd they are for the judge and jury to see.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/10/hawaii-governor-accused-of-suborning-election-fraud/
Polarik says:
Monday, May 10, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Lingle NEVER said Obamas birth certificate was legit. In fact, she made no statements at all (until now).
PetJake is Polarik
PetJake 09. Aug, 2010 at 10:07 am
Dr. C you presented this article not as a knowledgeable reference on surveys which it was not but as yet another attack piece on Birthers, that just so happen to touch on one Birther survey conducted by the Daily Kos, written by an anonymous author.
The quote about how people respond was simply a hook to bring in your readers.
The point of my post was totally missed by the people who, once again, devolved into ad hominem arguments to make their point.
The discussion following my information piece does little to assuage the belief that liberals always turn every discussion started by someone who does not agree with them into a personal attack.
(Boy, and how!)
The reason for doing so is to absolve them of ever having to actually process what was written.
It does not matter that I have 38 years of experience in designing and conducting large-scale surveys, because the lunatic fringe who attacked me would simply find another way to denigrate that as well.
So far, I have yet to see anything resembling an intelligent, well-thought out discussion by those arrogantly claiming to be smart and highly educated.
Factcheck? Politifact? Honolulu Advertiser? Cmon, Doc. These are not part of the Mainstream Media.
As I said, what does matter is how you ask the question and what are the choices given.
The example you gave, Are you sure Barack Obama was born in the United States? is a loaded question designed to prompt uncertainty.
The CNN question did nothing of the sort.
Their question was worded unambiguously and the choices given were equally balanced.
The point I made is valid that the way the question is worded and presented, along with the choices that are given, significantly effect the outcome of the survey far more than any heuristics involved in choosing the answer that best fits their interpetation and understanding.
Found at ObamaConspiracy
Will you be needing a room sir, or will you be waiting in our lobby ? [" : )
It’s only been a month. Maybe he needs more time to “unify” his theory. Might have been affected by sunspot interfence or something.
It’s now nearly 5 AM and I am broiling a steak. Care to join me before it hits 90 degrees outside?
Found at YouTube
TheDrRJP
New information has come to light that Barack Obama is not his real name, that his father was not Obama Sr, that his mother was not Ann Dunham, and that every photo taken of him with his parents or grandparents, or other students, or by himself at Punahou, Columbia, and Occidental were fabricated!
Just like his birth certificate.
He did not go to Columbia, or Occidental, or Punahou.
He was not born in the US. He is an imposter. THE GREATEST IDENTITY FRAUD IN HISTORY!
(1 week ago)
***
I am seriously worried about Polarik’s well-being.
And I mean that.
Thank you, and I would, except I have to paint the outside of the house. (and scrape it, and caulk it, and primer it, and fall off the ladder, pass out from heatstroke).
Polarik's Identity Confirmed as Dr. Ronald Jay Polland
LINKS GALORE to info about POLARIK and his other aliases on other websites.
I don’t know how I could have made that mistake.
They look nothing alike.
Try thirty years and a gazillion left turns.
You mean him or me?
Ron is not infallible. And neither am I.
I am not always wrong. And neither is Ron.
Well, we all know even with our untrained eyes how phony every freaking picture looked. And every person who could vouch, aside from the sister, is dead. Am I the only one who found it odd that NO INTERVIEW was ever given with the Hawaii Grandma?
Since when do they subject end stage terminal cancer patients to unrelated major surgery?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.