Skip to comments.
DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible
Butterdezillion
| Feb 23, 2010
| Butterdezillion
Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms date accepted and date filed on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms Date accepted by the State Registrar and Date filed by the State Registrar referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of Oahu or on the neighbor islands of Kauai, Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, or Lanai), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of Oahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the Date filed by the State Registrar is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obamas Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: artbell; article2section1; awgeez; birfer; birfers; birfersunite; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; citizen; citizenship; colb; colbaquiddic; coupdetat; coupdetatbykenya; criminalcharges; deception; dnc; doh; electionfraud; eligibility; enderwiggins; factcheck; forgery; fraud; hawaii; hawaiidoh; honolulu; howarddean; indonesia; ineligible; janiceokubo; kenya; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; obama; obamacolb; obamatruthfiles; okubo; pelosi; proud2beabirfer; theendenderwiggins; tinfoilhat; usancgldslvr; usurper; wrldzdmmstcnsprcy; zottedobots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,481-3,500, 3,501-3,520, 3,521-3,540 ... 3,681-3,700 next last
To: editor-surveyor; fireman15; EnderWiggins; KenyanBCPunkster
I’ll settle on how to get Ender to wear a tutu for our entertainment.
3,501
posted on
03/08/2010 10:46:09 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: editor-surveyor
3,502
posted on
03/08/2010 10:46:18 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: editor-surveyor; fireman15
Hey! That was good confirmation!
3,503
posted on
03/08/2010 10:47:02 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: Darksheare; fireman15; EnderWiggins; KenyanBCPunkster
"
Ill settle on how to get Ender to wear a tutu for our entertainment. Bill ayers in a tutu? now that would be fitting!
3,504
posted on
03/08/2010 10:48:52 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
To: ComputerGuy
"What exactly do you mean by resolution ?"
Well... what I specifically did not mean was simple pixel count.
What I meant was that the TIF image contained the most uncompressed original image data. The original TIF right out of the camera was 9,327 KB of information. Saving to to the JPEG format uses some very lossy compression algorithms; actual data is lost during the conversion and compression, data can that never be recovered.
You can see at least some of this if you take a JPEG and try to convert it back to TIF. Rather than ending up with an image that is 9,327 KB in size, you come in somewhat smaller... 8.594 KB. And not only have you forever lost roughly 8% of the original information in the process, the new TIF will retain many of the JPEG artifacts caused by compression (and that were originally misinterpreted by "Polarik" as signs of forgery on the Obama COLB).
The TIFF Image provided by Punkster last Friday is the highest quality image ever shared on the Internet. It possesses more uncompressed original data than any other such image, and it possesses none of the JPEG artifacts seen on the previously released images showing it cannot have been "backwards engineered" from one of them.
To: editor-surveyor; fireman15; EnderWiggins; KenyanBCPunkster
I wish my photoshop skills were up to it.
3,506
posted on
03/08/2010 10:50:04 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: editor-surveyor; Darksheare; fireman15; EnderWiggins; KenyanBCPunkster
He could dance with Rahm! Massa wouldn’t. Even he has standards!
3,507
posted on
03/08/2010 10:50:14 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: EnderWiggins; ComputerGuy
3,508
posted on
03/08/2010 10:51:18 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: DJ MacWoW; editor-surveyor; fireman15; EnderWiggins; KenyanBCPunkster
*Swishy accent*
Ah yesth, Ewwic Massa Standthing Behindth Rahm and Biww Ayersth, yeth that wouldth be exthiting!
3,509
posted on
03/08/2010 10:52:54 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: DJ MacWoW
I can live with it.
Punkster’s account is correct and mine was deliberately misleading.
To: EnderWiggins
So you’re admitting to being a multiple serial liar.
3,511
posted on
03/08/2010 10:57:05 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: Darksheare
At the time I did not realize I would have permission from Punkster to identify him as the source. So yes, I absolutely quibbled that I had “found it on line” rather than directly asked Punkster for it in a PM on another forum.
To: EnderWiggins
Considering you have repeatedly lied, the odds are that THIS too is a lie.
Dance and perform some more for us, forum pet...
3,513
posted on
03/08/2010 10:59:16 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: Darksheare
I admit to protecting my sources when I believe that they want to be protected. And that has certainly included deliberate obfuscation.
To: Darksheare
I hafta tell you, it pains me no end to be called a “liar” by a Birther.
To: EnderWiggins
The two of you mistakenly thought that you could come here and “play” us. You guessed wrong.
3,516
posted on
03/08/2010 11:01:04 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: EnderWiggins; Darksheare
I hafta tell you, it pains me no end to be called a liar by a Birther. Oh please! Playing a violin won't garner any sympathy here. I'm positive you've been called a liar before. Liars usually are.
3,517
posted on
03/08/2010 11:03:31 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: EnderWiggins
3,518
posted on
03/08/2010 11:04:36 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: EnderWiggins; KenyanBCPunkster
Sorry, Steve Eddy already outed himself.
How about you out yourself too?
3,519
posted on
03/08/2010 11:05:16 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: parsifal
You asked for it with your incoherent SPAMMING.
R.I.P.!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,481-3,500, 3,501-3,520, 3,521-3,540 ... 3,681-3,700 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson