Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
To you, perhaps. You don’t know anything about me so why do you assume you do? I asked a question and received an answer.
Yes I do. You posted earlier on this thread, asking the same question over and over despite getting an answer. It starts at post 14. And Man50D already answered you then. Want a link?
So you believe Nobama was a CIA agent?
Are you just slow or what or is it just getting to late in the night for you to pay attention?
I see you have resorted to ad hominem remarks.
Bye bye.
That one stuck of troll from the get-go.
It is indeed, a troll.
Asks the same things over and over. Broken record!
Disruptor. DJ is a longtime valuable FR member. You are a noob that disrupts and trolls.
Anyone who has read a handfull of your comments knows a lot about you.
Believing doesn’t make it so.
So if a Chinchilla got the most votes, he’d be president in your opinion regardless of whether or not it is eligible.
Not really. The reason I was civil to him is I really wanted to play out the whole story about the punkster bc. Instead of calling him troll and obot and telling him to take a hike, I kept asking questions and eventually it turned out that he provided proof to back up his claims. I thought some interesting information resulted. Did you read the entire exchange?
We have watched you ask the same things over and over. Even after getting answers. That’s a disruptive action.
What some consider answers, others consider non-answers.
This one is here to disrupt, draw attention to itself and away from useful discussion, and to mine for information. It’s a stinky, angry troll.
Only if you're trolling.
Newbies seeking info are not confrontational and abrasive. Trolls are.
Check your mail.
Yup. One more piece of the puzzle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.