DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible

Butterdezillion | Feb 23, 2010 | Butterdezillion

[butterdezillion]

I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".

The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:

In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.

MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).

There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).

There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.

[EnderWiggins]

In the English language , one usually needs actual questions.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Then optimize it and change the format to a .jpg, you can do that can't you?

The whole point of using the original TIF file was to put out an image of a level of quality that has not been made public before.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Did you take it or get it from another source?

I took the photograph.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Maybe you and your buddy should read names on the document.

I have read the names on the document. I put them there.

What is the question you have about the names?

[KenyanBCPunkster]

IS THIS THE DOCUMENT WITH E F LAVENDER ON IT It was a simple question. Anyone who has actually read it would know.

Of course it's the document with E.F. Lavender on it. Ender had already posted a lower resolution JPG image of it earlier.

[DJ MacWoW]

Guess again wiggy. You and your buddy can’t understand a simple question without prompts.

[EnderWiggins]

I posted the JPEG, and the TIF is available for your download. I have no intention of optimizing anything. The TIF is completely untouched.

[DJ MacWoW]

The preface “You mean” signals a question.

[Darksheare]

If you couldn’t understand it, then this is too advanced for you.

[Las Vegas Ron]

I took the photograph.

And you don't have PS to optimize the file so it can be posted?

Some "photographer" you are.

Quit wasting our time, troll.

[DJ MacWoW]

It took 3 damn pages for you to get it?! Did Wiggy have to explain it?

[EnderWiggins]

"The preface “You mean” signals a question.

No... it signals an assertion. A question mark signals a question.

[Darksheare]

Ack, arugula, it needs to be included in the contracts.
Make it a sticking point for the contract so that the trolls can then picket over pointless nonsense.
(Like the UAW does over pointless nonsense.)

[DJ MacWoW]

It was obviously a question. You and your buddy are the ONLY ones who didn’t get it. I wonder why......

[Darksheare]

Because it points out a flaw in their assertion that punkster originated the document.

[Fred Nerks]

...yep, while they communicate through the hole in their cubicle and read back through the FR threads to see who F.E. Lavender was; the Victorian United Law Clerk’s Society Secretary, the organisation which ultimately became the Victorian Law Review, with associations to the Harvard Law Review with a history of exchange students between the two. The more they try to cover up, the more links they will expose...and burn their fingers.

[EnderWiggins]

LOL... and yet, no one has addressed the simple fact that the TIF posted is the single highest quality image of Orly’s BC that has ever been posted on-line, and therefore can only have come from the originator.

[DJ MacWoW]

Neither of them knew who Lavender was. That’s obvious.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Make it a sticking point for the contract so that the trolls can then picket over pointless nonsense. .

It's either that or Shelly's garden!

[butterdezillion]

Ender has already been shown to be a liar. The whole “Punk’d” story was fake. The supposed Australian BC it was copied from was created AFTER the Kenyan BC was already posted.

If we ignore him he might go away.