DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible

Butterdezillion | Feb 23, 2010 | Butterdezillion

[butterdezillion]

I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".

The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:

In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.

MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).

There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).

There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.

[Darksheare]

Not on your life troll boy.

[DJ MacWoW]

The TIF speaks for itself.

Nope. It doesn't. No one knows you or trusts you. They haven't opened your link yet.

[EnderWiggins]

"LOL, an uncompressed tif generally tops out above that."

What a goofy comment.

And uncompressed TIF "tops out" at whatever size the uncompressed TIF tops out at.

You do know how file sizes work, right?

[EnderWiggins]

LOL.. where else would you suggest I meet him?

[Darksheare]

Yes I do.
I do art on the side.
Scanning in high quality leads to LARGE files.

[Darksheare]

For trolls?
How about Bukowski’s.

[DJ MacWoW]

All we have is your “accidental” meeting story. Tell me why ANY of us should trust you?

[Natural Born 54]

He gave me this link in freepmail and said he posted it way back when.....

http://fearlessblogging.com/post/view/3037

I remember seeing this in another format back when it happened but I do not think it was this site.

[Darksheare]

Getting hard to keep track of two handles?

[Las Vegas Ron]

Download it for yourself and look.

We ain't biting wiggy, why don't you post it?

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Red Steel asked a question in Post 2444

Again, I didn't see a question. It just said "You mean the E.F. Lavender document..."

I don't know what the question is or what he meant by that. Can someone elaborate on that?

[DJ MacWoW]

Btw, your “friend” still hasn’t answered Red Steel.

[Darksheare]

Remember, it’s a supposedly high quality tif that is uncompressed, yet it is merely 9,000 kb.

[EnderWiggins]

"The trolls still seem to be extremely anxious about this one."

The only anxiety I'm seeing here is all the Birthers afraid to download a TIF file.

Does not one of you know how to protect your PC from malware?

I am suddenly underwhelmed by the technical expertise of Birfdom.

[Darksheare]

We have no reason to trust you or your fiel.
It could be a poisoned image.
You do know about certain computer virii that use poisoned tif files, right?

[DJ MacWoW]

The name isn’t familiar to me and I was on that huge thread.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Scanning in high quality leads to LARGE files.

And tiffs are ENORMOUS

[EnderWiggins]

"why don't you post it?"

PhotoBucket won't host TIF files, only JPEG files."

[Darksheare]

I know, I have two files at hundred plus mb.

[Darksheare]

For good reason.
One, tifs are huge.
Second, see post 2515.