Posted on 12/15/2006 7:22:32 PM PST by FarRockaway
To: The Republican Party
I am a Christian conservative or social conservative. I am Pro-Life. I vote.
Rudy Giuliani is pro-gay, pro-gun control, and pro-abortion.
For these reasons and others, I state very firmly that I will not vote for Rudy Giuliani for President of the United States under any circumstances.
Senator John McCain has waffled on human cloning, has supported experimentation on human embryos, and has attacked prominent Christian clergy because of the, "evil influence that they exercise." John McCain has said of Pro-Life voters, on a public broadcast radio show, that they are, "otherwise intelligent people who say that that's the only issue that will determine their vote." McCain told the San Francisco Chronicle, "I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade."
For these reasons and others, I state very firmly that I will not vote for John McCain for President of the United States under any circumstances.
Sincerely,
"You are on a roll! lol"
I know, sometimes you just want to tee them up like golf balls and smack them about 300 yards. :)
Now you're Miss Cleo.
TRY looking at polls instead of posting your imaginations of perceived doom. You haven;t a clue about "others" and certainly cannot speak for them.
The primaries have yet to commence.
LMAO!
Keep em coming....you're killin' me here!
I could win this war in a matter of days. The first battle would take about twenty minutes with no casualties on our side... People need to stop kidding themselves and look at the cold reality of it...
Is it Charmin? I'll wager Tancredo likes baby blue Charmin.
Even if what you say is true, and it may well be, Bush still lost the popular vote and won Florida by the narrowest of margins in a state where his brother was the fairly popular governor.
The main point is that Bush did not exactly win overwhelmingly in 2000.
The poster was trying to say that because W ran as a conservative in 2000 and won that Tancredo can win in 2008. I was trying to point out some of the circumstances in 2000 and how Bush's victory isn't exactly a model others may want to follow.
As for your comment, I disagree. Historians still vigorously debate who won the elction of 1800 and 1876 and how they unfolded. They still talk about JFK stealing votes in 1960. I think we can both agree that Florida in 2000 was an extremely close call and that it sholudn't be a plan for 2008.
Do the polls matter. No. If only 5% of base of the party bolt, which I think they will, Rino Rudy loses.
You're hallucinating
I need to update my chart to keep up with this thread and all the changes
geez
I have learned a valuable lesson from these "teach them a lesson" clowns though. Next election I'll be contributing anything and everything I can to whoever is running against Tom Terrific. I don't much give a crap what their position is on the issues, I just want to send a message.
I do have issues, but that's another topic independent of this.
I've never experienced anywhere in the south this "Mormon-loathing" thing you're so sure of.
Consider this though: Recently--i.e.: within the past decade or so--the Southern Baptists had their National Convention in Salt Lake City, and they did this for one reason and one reason only: to thumb their nose at the Mormons.
By the way, take the time to look up the definition of "cult" sometime, too.
"okay" I think I "will".
Of course polls matter --- polls sample Independents as well and they usually decide the winner or outcome.
FYI -- the BASE always votes. It's the one issue malcontents and fringers who try to blackmail the party and stay home or vote third party.
Yeah, my agenda is my country and not a ever growing lists of complaints/carping/whining.
If you don't like the current crop of nominees, you run.
Correct assessment.
I don't have my pom-poms anymore.
That's because until the late 1970's, Mormons officially believed that all black people were black because they were deliberately cursed by God for not supporting Jesus during Satan's rebellion. That was official doctrine until the movie
"Superfly" came out. Then Salt Lake City had a revelation and
whoosh! Doctrine changed over night.
But facts about religion can't possibly be meaningful or
drive human behaviours. No, human behaviours about religion are all driven by irrational suspicion.
LOL --- I'd rather try to split an atom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.