This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Enough noise from this damn thing. |
Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7
Im happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)
(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
The two are not mutually exclusionary; and if this is your grounds for calling him a liar, you don't have a leg to stand on.
He claims that he just happened to be taking a long predawn drive to clear his head, that someone was tailgating him, that he stopped and got out of his car and they stopped too and hit him. He couldn't describe the vehicle. Or the assailants. Or the metal object he was hit with. Or where he was when the alleged assault took place. Or even the hour when it took place. Literally no useful details of any kind.
Most of this is false. He described the vehicle as a pick up. He described what one of the men was wearing. He said he was beaten with fists, and possibly a metal object. He was unsure only about which of two section roads he was beaten on, and he reported the time.
The alleged assault occurred at precisely the right time for him to obscure his forced resignation as chair of his department due to his unethical behavior.
He was forced to resign after the beating, not before.
He is not the first professor to manufacture a fake "hate crime" to deflect criticism.
Oh, because one 'professor' manufactured a hate crime, any other report of same from any other faculty member forever must be false.
You're calling Mirecki a liar, but in fact almost everything you wrote above is false. So I guess at least we've identified one liar.
Paul Mirecki was not making fun of the religion of Paul Mirecki worship - he was making fun of Christianity
He was brought up Catholic. He was making fun of Catholicism. I do it too. Deal with it, and stop ranting.
I'm out of here. The creationist stupidity and mendaciousness is worse even than usual. Thinking of Ann Coulter must have gotten them all extra rabid. Tschuss!
Every other word in your screed was misspelled.
And if you don't know how to spell CONSERVATIVE with an S, you are not one.
I'm right behind ya!
This is not how evidence is evaluated and validated. Please stop spreading these misrepresentatinos.
yet when creationists do the same,
What creationists do is *not* comparable to how evidence is validated in science. It is a gross misrepresentation to call these two very differing methods "the same".
they are called stupid, ignorant, etc.
When the shoe fits, yeah -- as it does far too often.
ANTI-RELIGIOUS-CHRISTIAN-CONCERVATIVE SUDOINTELLECTUAL SCIENE COMMUNITY ... placemarker
And which of those folks has a degree in the biological sciences?
"When the shoe fits, yeah -- as it does far too often."
It certainly does.
Well, hell, if you can't refute or counter it, why not just airily wave it away?
The truth of the matter is you cannot even understand what was posted there, but that doesn't matter because it doesn't matter how ignorant you truly are, you're going to heave where you can laugh at all them there pointy-headed knowitall scientists what thinks they is better than you because they're soooo smart while they roast in the pits of Hell.
So me and my Jewish friends aren't conservative???
You stick that bit of worthless crap back in your butt where it came from.
Never ping me again, or I'll alert the mods.
Thanx for pointing that out ..... everyother word ... wow .... I guess the FR speel cker doesn't work wel.
Did I say I was a koncervetiv? May I just went to publik shool.
You're not really expecting anything close to the truth from an anti-evo, do you? They cannot be trusted to do anything like research before posting; they simply go with the first thing that pops into their heads as if it were divine revelation.
The earth is getting warmer whether you like it or not. The question is whether it is caused by man. Can you show me where evolutionists believe global warming is man-made and the correlation between the two?
LOL!
don't "Scientists"(Darwinists Imams) believe "global warming" is man made?
Dontja just love it when "they" do not dicuss what was said but focus on that which really does not matter.
re: you're going to heave where you can laugh at all them there pointy-headed knowitall scientists
Mostly we have here the liberal arts "social" scientists...Painters of pictures and spinners of tales.
"Come to think of it, that's a pretty common tactic amongst the "more conservative than thou" crowd."
As compared to the liberals who we all know welcome challenges to their PC rhetoric.
/sarc (there I remembered it this time)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.