Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.
How much money generated will go into the hands of terrorists who seek to kill us?
Of course this is the correct move by Bush since the critics are clueless, and most likely never stepped upon a U.S. port in their lives. As they have images of Abdul at a gate house wearing a turban, with an AK-47.
"Lawmakers, he said, must "step up and explain why a middle eastern company is held to a different standard.""
Well, let's see....
Great Britain's official state religion is the Church of England (Christianity)
Dubai's state religion is Islam.
The Terrorists religion is....Islam.
There you have the difference. Thank you very much for your attention.
You have a link to their declaration?
Including national security.
How Clintonian.
How utterly stupid of a thought / comment - The reality is ...if you are so ill-informed to think that by simply "owning" these said ports the UAE could increase the risk to our national security......you only prove you don't have a clue.
There is so much more to it then simply that. Who owns it.
By the way, how many ports to American companies own and run???....(zero!). Should we force U.S. companies to start up and get in this business?
"Port security" is nothing more then a smoke screen to hype to the uninformed and 10-second attentioned spanned American public.
Well then! Let's hand them the Nuclear Launch codes!
Is that an Illuminiti symbol?
Thats just fine so what have we got to lose by delaying the take over and openly discussing the matter in public with hearings form the pro and the con so that fears may be alleviated.
PSA is the only other company who bid on P&O.
If the Dubai deal gets canned, does the job now fall to the company from Singapore (PSA)?
Could that be what this is about?
Weeel, it's strategery, don't you see? The opposition is playing checkers and Bush is playing three-dimensional chess. He's the Poker Player In Chief. He knows what he's doing. Just because of the history doesn't mean they won't be on our side now... You got to understand the Man, man! He's not like us. He's... grooovy.
And you like a creep.
Yes, it does...we are in a war against them...Britian is out ally. This smells and it smells and it smells. I'm livid about this.
Some haven't learned a thing. Don't bet against the cowboy.
There is more to this story than we know.
DIDN'T YOU WATCH TV TODAY STARTING WITH FORMER HOMELAND SECURITY DIRECTOR, THEN ALBERTO GONZALES?
NOTHING ELSE TO SAY.
Why not Iraq? Was not that one of the reasons for the war?
You.
If that is the case, they should be clear about it.
ha ha. you are right. News at seven.
So...
G.W. threw down a gauntlet of challenge. Whatever could happen next?
A bipartisan group of bureaucrats from Federal to State-level whip up enough public support to get together to tell an Arab terror-sponsor to go get knotted? Is that about right?
Am I the only one to see the country being brought together in an "us and them" scenario?? (And about freakin' time!). Fercryinoutloud, even the Kos Kidz are up in arms about this port business!
Big picture time, people. The prez has plenty of 'face' to spare if it will get Dems off the fence and moderates (aka candya$$es) start thinking in terms of "No Compromise with THE ENEMY" in the war on terror.
It's well worth the investment to have America united in the War on Terror.
Go George!
Okay, in that case, he's just an a$$hat, a$$clown and everything else that the DUmmies over at the DUmp say he is...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.