Oh, really, produce the wolf it speciated from thousands of years ago. Not a drawing of a concept, the real thing.. oops.
It was a dog then, it's a dog now. The two are defined as seperate species for reasons even your own can't fully defend. I know. I've seen evos back away from it quickly because that is how loosely "species" is defined. Scientists debating the matter with your "dangerous" (snickering) Dr. Dino have had to admit as much publically because they could not run from that fact. That's the truth in stone. Deal with it.
Oh, really, produce the wolf it speciated from thousands of years ago. Not a drawing of a concept, the real thing.. oops.
Not until you produce your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather. The real thing -- until then we can't accept that you're actually human. Oops!
Clue for the clueless: There are more ways to establish familial reliationships and common ancestry than just producing an old corpse. But hey, you wouldn't know anything about that, because you're a know-nothing creationist who is pig-ignorant about biology.
Now run along and go bother someone your own mental age.
It was a dog then, it's a dog now.
To borrow a stupidity from creationist Ken Ham: "Excuse me, were you there?" You're just stating your ignorant presumption as if you had actually established its truth. You haven't. Biologists, on the other hand, have overwhelming evidence of the common ancestry of domestic dogs and wolves. But again, you wouldn't know anything about that, because you're so *proud* of your utter ignorance that you've never bothered to get an education on this topic before you spout off, just like almost all of the other loudmouthed anti-evolutionists.