Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc
[But it is no longer a wolf, from which it speciated thousands of years ago.]

Oh, really, produce the wolf it speciated from thousands of years ago. Not a drawing of a concept, the real thing.. oops.

Not until you produce your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather. The real thing -- until then we can't accept that you're actually human. Oops!

Clue for the clueless: There are more ways to establish familial reliationships and common ancestry than just producing an old corpse. But hey, you wouldn't know anything about that, because you're a know-nothing creationist who is pig-ignorant about biology.

Now run along and go bother someone your own mental age.

It was a dog then, it's a dog now.

To borrow a stupidity from creationist Ken Ham: "Excuse me, were you there?" You're just stating your ignorant presumption as if you had actually established its truth. You haven't. Biologists, on the other hand, have overwhelming evidence of the common ancestry of domestic dogs and wolves. But again, you wouldn't know anything about that, because you're so *proud* of your utter ignorance that you've never bothered to get an education on this topic before you spout off, just like almost all of the other loudmouthed anti-evolutionists.

877 posted on 02/14/2006 2:07:12 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon

Right, Dogs are dogs but came from something else and as proof, we won't produce what they came for just as we'll call a different breed of Dog a species so that we can say evolution took place instead of variation...

Hint: nobody bought this nutbag attempt and the public knows what a dog is even if you too ideologically smart to be any earthly good evolutionists don't.


879 posted on 02/14/2006 2:10:40 PM PST by Havoc (Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies ]

To: Ichneumon
To borrow a stupidity from creationist Ken Ham: "Excuse me, were you there?" You're just stating your ignorant presumption as if you had actually established its truth.

No, I'm just invoking common sense. Dogs come from Dogs. We witness that and expect that to be so. Until someone can prove otherwise, the bottom line assumption that does stand as reasonable is that the ancestor was a dog. If you wish to offer something as otherwise reasonable, you need to establish that - which is the subject of our current discussion. I've seen a dog give birth to pups that grew up into "dogs" (gasp). I've never seen a cat give birth to a dog though I have witnessed the birth of many many kittens. So have a great cross-section of our population. They haven't seen cats or dogs produce other than cats or dogs either. Guess they're all just blind, dumb and misinformed.. your argument as it were.

881 posted on 02/14/2006 2:15:38 PM PST by Havoc (Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies ]

To: Ichneumon
Now run along and go bother someone your own mental age.

Easy now, Ich. Don't want to encourage anyone, even accidentally, to pick on five year olds.

887 posted on 02/14/2006 2:22:54 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson