By poster artcolley:
oh I dunno. By the time the ARubans get the dogs there, the dogs will be too old to walk.
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/12/2006 2:29:42 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Thread 19: |
Posted on 01/19/2006 3:32:35 AM PST by RGVTx
So....did Glenda report it? (Simian?)
Sorry that work interferes with your FReeping. Chuckling here.
On Greta's blog at the FOX website, she said that Beth did break her leg. Dunno how.
nice finds to go with what we've been digging up.....post'em so the good guys that read this thread can make note of them.....
I found these while I was reading through looking for information about the shoes. Maybe Deepak didn't suddenly call or meet Juran at 11:00
http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html
On 8-9 JUG told “Court TV” that Principal Suspect J. SLOOT definitely was not at the “Wyndham Hotel” like he said when Current Suspect P. SLOOT (supposedly) phoned him in the early morning hours of 5-31. (after the ARUBA police and the TWITTY’s showed up at the Suspects SLOOT’s home.
----------------------------
BETH stated 7-13 that she has found out that on 5-31 when Current Suspect P. SLOOT told the police that Principal Suspect J. SLOOT was at the “Wyndham Hotel” gambling at 3 AM, that Principal Suspect J. SLOOT was not actually at the “Wyndham Hotel.” (BETH did not elaborate
----------------------------
On 9-9 the “National Enquirer” wrote:
EXLUSIVE! NATALEE MOM'S HORROR
By DAVID WRIGHT
snip
"Paulus said he'd get Joran. Then he came back and said, 'He's not here.' He called Joran's cell phone and after speaking to him said, 'He says he's at the Wyndham hotel playing poker.'
"They all headed for the Wyndham. But there was no sign of Joran in the casino. Since then I've questioned just about everyone at the hotel, and there is no indication Joran was ever there on the 31st.
-----------------
Current Suspect P. SLOOT says Principal Suspect J. SLOOT may be at the "Wyndham Hotel" casino gambling. (Review of the “Wyndham Hotel” video tapes document that Principal Suspect J. SLOOT was never at the “Wyndham Hotel” casino gambling the evening/morning of 5-30/31 as his father claimed to the TWITTY’s and the 2 ARUBAN police officers; Principal Suspect J. SLOOT had not been at the “Wyndham Hotel,” at all on 5-30/31)
".......she asked me if they were my slaves because they were driving around but Deepak and Satish never ended up hearing that. I told them that afterwards. So, yes, she said in Alabama we consider black people slaves"
"I told them that afterwards".....and THERE is the flashpoint for deepak......he finally gets a chance at a piece of pretty easter candy, but joran had put this into his head.....and it flashed when all she was doing was trying to heep from being raped.
well, okay, i am really summarizing two different statements into one a) the "never has sex without a condom", and b) went to the beach and/or his house with the intention of having sex, therefore, knowing the mindset of in-heat teenagers who aren't predators, let alone one who is, he would have condoms at his apartment, or would have obtained them elsewhere on the way to CnC, if, in fact, as he has stated at different times, he went to all three locations that evening with the specific intention of having sex...
as for this hitler stuff, my own son has laughingly called me hitler infront of myself and friends, so i have no problem believing natalee used the term as slang to imply her mom was strict...in joran's world that would be terrifying (and, implied by his own mother, impossible), in natalee's world that would be a joking way of saying "my mom keeps constant tabs"
the three "fights" or arguments with mountain brook students say alot, too, especially when the clash is with natalee's relatives prior to her disappearance...his sociopathic nonsense about never, ever having anger management counseling when he was known to be going to a shrink because he was "running the household" and wouldn't listen at all to his parents says a lot, too...the kid is a big dumb erection out of control and his defining himself was a hoot if it wasn't a tragedy
VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.
Most likely a lie. Don't you think one "No" would have been enough?
Methinks he doth protest too much.
Posted by MF at FOB:
Sorry for the delay, I'm back.
There are a few rumors these last days that information about the investigation is being leaked to some local media and in one of those leaks the ALE has the information that some person related to this case has been given up to that amount of money in recent days. More details I can not say for certainty but will wait for any one who can search for that information.
+
By poster artcolley:
oh I dunno. By the time the ARubans get the dogs there, the dogs will be too old to walk.
ROTFLMBO!! How true!!
If they find her there...they knew she was there all along. IMO
-----
Or they placed her there recently.
I think Natalee might have been placed in more than one place over this time since she disappeared.
I think you may be right. I'll be surprised if they find her there though. If I'm not mistaken, this 'tip' came in ack in mid-January, unless they have another one. It's now March 8th...now sincere search has been conducted based on this tip? (I don't count a bunch of gvt employees poking around the sand with sticks as a sincere search)
I would like to get more information from TES about why they discontinued their search of the quarry back around June 27th. Do you know if their is any way to find that out?
VAN SUSTEREN: OK. So your father — so what did your father say in the phone call?
VAN DER SLOOT: In the phone call? Yes, he called me and he said, There's people here in front of the house looking for their daughter.
VAN SUSTEREN: Did you know who they meant, who the daughter was, at that point?
VAN DER SLOOT: At the point, when I got that phone call, I was, like, you know, (DELETED) what if it's that girl from last night, you know, the girl from the beach? That was my first reaction.
snip
VAN SUSTEREN: So you arrive home. And now, your father had gone to the Wyndham Hotel to look for you, is that right?
VAN DER SLOOT: I think so.
VAN SUSTEREN: Do you know why he went to the Wyndham and not the Radisson?
VAN DER SLOOT: Because that's — that's where the — I don't know. I think that's where we said we were because that's where the car was parked.
VAN SUSTEREN: So is the Wyndham next to the Radisson?
VAN DER SLOOT: It's a couple hotels farther up.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK.
VAN DER SLOOT: Like, that's where — that's when we were driving. That's where the car was at the point when they called us.
"If Paulus called Joran on his cell phone when Joran claims he was sitting in the car in a parking lot near a casino but not the one he was in just before, why didn't Joran tell his father he would come right home. Did his father just say - where are you and Joran said at the Wyndam (sp) where the car was parked and then his father hung up without saying anything?"
The word from Croes to the drinking teenagers on the beach had gotten to deepak quickly or instantly, and deepak got to joran before paulus called joran when Croes et al got to VDS house the first time.......deepak/joran realized they had a serious problem and took the scenic route home to discuss their story options....joran not waiting for paulus at the appointed place fits nicely with the delay factor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.