Posted on 12/20/2005 7:54:38 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
Fox News alert a few minutes ago says the Dover School Board lost their bid to have Intelligent Design introduced into high school biology classes. The federal judge ruled that their case was based on the premise that Darwin's Theory of Evolution was incompatible with religion, and that this premise is false.
Where's your evidence? Why is that every single evolutionist on this thread in order to make their points have all become inaccurate and inconcise?
Have you ever poked one to see the "wolf's milk" ooze forth?
Denseness is a hallmark Of EVOS and your posts prove it every time.
festering mass of unsupported assertions placemarker
Off topic....but which Carolina and what part? (I'd ask about guitars, but I know nothing about them.)
Funny. I thought he pretty well nailed it.
A judge denouncing the motives of only one side in such a lawsuit and calling them liars based on nothing more than his divination of same, is unseemly in numerous ways, not the least of which is that motive is irrelevant to establishment of a secular purpose.
Where are you getting this nonsense? They were flat-out caught. If you have to hide behind your drug habit, you're busted.
You can write all the paragraphs you want about what color the sky is on your planet. It isn't going to matter when the facts on this planet are against you.
Clayton, NC (about half an hour from Raleigh).
Oh, yeah, "Creationism is a real cancer on Conservatism"...yeah, uh sure. Keep telling yourself that. And God I hope you don't keep that tagline, unless you feel like getting hate mail in your Freepmail.
[...God is who created us. Evolution is how he did it...]
I believe there is NO GAP between Gen 1:1 and 1:2.
"I declared the former things long ago and they went
forth from My mouth, and I proclaimed them......
SUDDENLY I acted, and they came to pass." Isaiah 48:3.
If I believed in intelligent design, then it might not be unreasonable.
Since I don't believe in ID, then yes, it's unreasonable.
Now, how about my question?
Got proof?
Ignorance is not evidence. Faith is not evidence.
I guess we just differ: you want elected tyrants to have unfettered power; I prefer to have elected tyrants held in check by Constitutional proscriptions. I accept the reality of the Constitutional system as it is currently arrayed; you prefer to wrap yourself around long rejected legal arguments whilst barking at the moon.
I corrected it in a later thread. Is there a way to correct the original? It was meant to be presented as sarcasm.
Been off all afternoon chasing a hardware bug that has moved from my power supply into my sound card. ("It could HAPPEN!"--Judy Tenuda.)
I'm never gonna catch up on this thread now. Especially without the little "clack" sounds on each request for next page.
Oh how arrogant of you.
You computer is possessed by daemons.
Where's my evidence for what? eleni121 making numerous repeated unsubtantiated assertions which he cannot and will not provide any evidence whatsoever in support of? Err, all of his posts in this thread...
So is gravity.
There are major gaps in the fossil record.
There are known inconsistencies between relativity and quantum mechanics. Shall we throw them out and just decide that God makes everything move?
Are there other explanations that contain gaps? Yes, Intelligent Design.
And Zeus, Xenu, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and a few thousand others. How come ID is the preferred "theory"?
So why does one find favor and the other is found faulty?
Because there's lots of evidence to support one and none to support the others.
Gone for the night 'placemarker'...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.