Posted on 06/20/2005 8:40:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Terri Schiavo's husband buried her cremated remains in a Clearwater cemetery Monday, inscribing on her bronze grave marker that ``I kept my promise.''
David Gibbs, an attorney for the woman's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, said inscribing the marker that way was a nasty political statement by Michael Schiavo, who held the service and burial Monday before telling her family.
``Obviously, that's a real shot and another unkind act toward a grieving mom and dad,'' Gibbs said.
After earlier announcing plans to bury his wife's ashes in their native Pennsylvania, Michael Schiavo instead interred them at Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park in Clearwater, near Tampa, his attorney, George Felos, said in a short news release Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...
Now you're making stuff up.
it seems weird to me that a "quote" is being said to her, the one buried there--on her tombstone... ages from now, when anyone comes across her tombstone, it'll seem as though the quote is coming from her... they'll ponder, "hmm... i wonder what promise she kept... did she die for this promise?"
Those are LEGAL technicalities you speak of. We're dealing with HUMAN issues in this situation, and its evident to the lot of us that Michael has no real human soul. As pointed out by Brit Hume : "she wasn't dying, therefore she had to be killed." That's a painful truth that the apologists cannot look in the eyes...why, I couldn't say. I personally cannot concieve of starving a human being to death simply to get back at family members that said not-so-nice things to me. The worst I would ever do to a family member that was hateful to me is say to them to their face "I abjure you. I want nothing more to do with you." MS has control issues that go far deeper than mere technicalities.
I guess the Devil really IS in the details, is that what you are trying to say????
So the autopsy that said she was blind was completely wrong?
You Michael haters constantly confuse expert medical diagnosis with "HIS opinion". He acted on sound medical advice not undisciplined emotion.
There's two types of justice: God's justice, and man's justice. Michael unfortunately "won" the case in the court of "man's justice". But there's another judge before which he must someday appear.
Admirable. Now turn that same defense and concern for a mother to Mrs. Schindler. For up until now you have been heartless and spiteful to her. Equally a mother. Terri's mom.
Aren't they? This one is really interesting; we have people being damned to hell, others' mothers being impuned, and now Nelly Olson.
OMG. Even for you, that's low. It's one of the lowest posts I've seen anyone make about this matter.
You're despicable.
Don't try to change the subject; you said a crappy thing about another poster's mother; it was uncalled for and now you're trying to turn the tables.
It won't work. You just obviously can't argue your points.
if you haven't gotten this message from your studies of Christ, then I think perhaps you aren't paying much attention.
Of course! The entire known world is lying except the people on FR who have the "real facts."
Good point.
Come to think of it, people actually have their rotten teeth extracted.
I wonder....
Would Terri's tooth extraction have been paid for by
I'll bet Terri's parents would have paid for the extractions, if Michael needed help.
With all those possibilities, Michael should have been able to get the dental work done...don't you think?
Your post #223 is the biggest load of BS I've seen today. It's quite fascinating to watch freepers reject medical testimony under oath, but buy into every conspiracy theory to come down the pike.
LOL!
I'm not.
BTW, you have Freepmail.
(You really don't, but doesn't that sound MYSTERIOUS and CONSPIRATORIAL to post?)
Not true. And his "sound medical advice" has been disputed by reputable doctors. Again, he didn't trot out his claim of her wishes until it was in his best interest to do so.
A. You have no idea how long I've been "around."
B. You have no idea what I "buy into" or why.
C. You seem overly anxious to be rid of anyone who disagrees with you; altho my initial statement supporting the ablility to converse without a pinged group of armed combatants is what you hastily jumped at.
D. Holier-than-thou is a bit judgemental, isn't it?
E. I will determine if this is the place for me. You'll definitely be a part of that decision. I believe you may be for many.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.