Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: conserv13

Isn't this a violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Sec. 201(a) ), which outlawed discrimination in public accommodations? Granted, this law specifies "race, color, religion, or national origin" as being the grounds upon which discrimination is excluded, but isn't one of the claims of the Dems in the Blue States that we voted the way we did in the Red States because we're a bunch of religious fanatics?????

Or, is Freeman's a private club where membership is required and this act doesn't apply?


4 posted on 11/19/2004 2:35:09 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGreg

It's a downtown hipster place.


11 posted on 11/19/2004 2:37:21 PM PST by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg
Isn't this a violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Sec. 201(a) ), which outlawed discrimination in public accommodations?

Yes, if it can be proven that the restruant was NOT full, and if they want to get lawyers involved...

15 posted on 11/19/2004 2:39:06 PM PST by PhotoFixer3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

Dear TexasGreg,

The 1964 Civil Rights Act banned discrimination based on membership in five protected classes: race, religion, color, ethnic origin, and sex.

At least as it applies to employment law, there is no bar to discrimination based on politics.

I expect that the management of a restaurant may also discriminate based on politics, all things being equal.


sitetest


31 posted on 11/19/2004 2:45:00 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

FREEP!
They are accepting job applications

To apply, please email resume to: jobs@freemansrestaurant.com

I just applied for head jerk!


43 posted on 11/19/2004 2:48:47 PM PST by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

I'd say the "4 years" quip qualifies this for the hate crime adder.


45 posted on 11/19/2004 2:49:27 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("We are in the process of allowing them to self-actualise" LtC. Rainey, Fallujah, 11/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

It's a privately owned restuarant, and they are refusing to served individuals for political reasons. They have that right, just as we have the right to encourage everyone we know not to eat there. If they wanna be dicks, let 'em. It's just one more example of liberal tolerance and acceptance of diversity, anyhow...


57 posted on 11/19/2004 2:53:37 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg
Or, is Freeman's a private club where membership is required and this act doesn't apply?

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone."

Or, has private property rights suddenly fallen out of fashion now that Bush is in office?

60 posted on 11/19/2004 2:54:09 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

No violation here the 'victims' were white republicans. No problem....move on!


84 posted on 11/19/2004 3:01:32 PM PST by PISANO (Never Forget 911!! & 911's 1st Heroes..... "Beamer, Glick, Bingham & Bennett.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg
...this law specifies "race, color, religion, or national origin"

When differentiating between conservatives and libs, human is a "race".
Therefore, the Bush twins have grounds to sue.

100 posted on 11/19/2004 3:05:32 PM PST by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg
Isn't this a violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Sec. 201(a) )

Probably not, because "First Daughters" aren't a protected class. I'll defend the Freeman's right of association, while also noting that they are total jackasses.

114 posted on 11/19/2004 3:10:23 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (A plan is not a litany of complaints)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg
"Isn't this a violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Sec. 201(a) ), which outlawed discrimination in public accommodations?"

A lot of cities - Seattle included - have broadened the list of protected categories to include things like creed, political affiliation, and sexual orientation. If an incident like this happened in Seattle, it would be illegal.
136 posted on 11/19/2004 3:20:09 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

The two of them are welcome at my home ... especially the one with the darker hair.


183 posted on 11/19/2004 3:45:01 PM PST by bushisdamanin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

I'm afraid that the restaurant in question is not going to pass sanitary inspection and that later it might even be busted for attempted bribery of an inspector.


216 posted on 11/19/2004 4:16:01 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

I haven't read the thread yet, but political affiliation is a long-neglected area of prejudice, which needs or does not need to be addressed depending on your view of these laws in general.


264 posted on 11/19/2004 5:14:36 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

Perhaps Barry Goldwater was right when he said that the northeast should be cut off and let float our to sea.


371 posted on 11/20/2004 10:31:00 AM PST by joybelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson