[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

It's a privately owned restuarant, and they are refusing to served individuals for political reasons. They have that right, just as we have the right to encourage everyone we know not to eat there. If they wanna be dicks, let 'em. It's just one more example of liberal tolerance and acceptance of diversity, anyhow...

[jimbo123]

NY State Division of Human Rights

http://www.nysdhr.com/complaints.html

[Hildy]

If this is true, let's get Drudge to put it on his page. Then EVERYONE will know. That's the best we can do. So how are we going to verify this?

[zwerni]

private or not. you cannot discriminate ... that IS against the law.

[TexasGreg]

It's a privately owned restuarant, and they are refusing to served individuals for political reasons. They have that right, just as we have the right to encourage everyone we know not to eat there. If they wanna be dicks, let 'em. It's just one more example of liberal tolerance and acceptance of diversity, anyhow...

Just as it is illegal for a privately owned restuarant to discrimination against African Americans who wish to eat there, so also it is against the law for a privately owned restuarant to discriminate based upon the religion of patrons. Given the way in which the Dems have painted all conservatives as religious idiots, one could make an argument on the religious grounds.

In this case, however, it was based tightly upon who these girls were. The action of the management, and the patrons there, was the height of incivility; they reflect their counterparts at DUmmy land.