Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Felon voting rejected
las Vegas Review ^ | 2-17-02 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 11/07/2004 10:26:40 AM PST by vannrox

Felon voting rejected



The Senate voted 63-31 to reject an amendment by Sens. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa., to make it easier for convicted felons to regain their voting rights.

Nine states impose lifetime voting bans on convicted felons. In 32 states, felons are allowed to vote after serving their sentence and completing parole. The Reid-Specter amendment would have allowed convicted felons to vote in federal elections only.

After paying their debt to society, felons should be allowed to vote again, Reid said.

Critics argued felons are not the type of people who should participate in elections.

Reid voted for the Reid-Specter amendment. Ensign voted against it.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2004; arlin; bush; democrat; dnc; election; felon; fraud; future; liberty; mandidate; past; reid; republican; rights; rnc; senator; specter; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
Specter loves to collaboriate with the Democrats.
1 posted on 11/07/2004 10:26:41 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox

sphincter.


2 posted on 11/07/2004 10:29:26 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

He's got to go.

That kind of position warrants censure.


3 posted on 11/07/2004 10:29:52 AM PST by JesseJane ("Hey hey...ho ho...a cowboy, not a gigolo." - I love this... whoever said it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

I see a large, fast moving bandwagon.

Arlen ain't here fer long.


4 posted on 11/07/2004 10:31:27 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
GRASSROOTSPA CALL TO ACTION

STOP SPECTER FROM BLOCKING BUSH'S JUDGES

Contact Senator Frist 202-224-3135

Contact Senator Santorum 202-224-6324

Tell them in no uncertain terms that Specter cannot be made Senate Judiciary Chairman

Do NOT take "no" for an answer!

Bush has no Mandate?

Just say "NO" To Specter's Games!

Senate Judiciary Committee GOP Members

Contact Senator Orrin Hatch 202-224-5251

Contact Senator Charles Grassley 202-224-3744

Contact Senator Jon Kyl 202-224-4521

Contact Senator Mike DeWine 202-224-2315

Contact Senator Jeff Sessions 202-224-4124

Contact Senator Lindsey Graham -202-224-5972

Contact Senator Larry Craig 202-224-2752

Contact Senator Saxby Chambliss 202-224-3521

Contact Senator John Cornyn 202-224-2934

5 posted on 11/07/2004 10:32:25 AM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Good priorities Arlen.

How about increasing the penalties for federal election fraud before loosening the state-mandated restrictions.


6 posted on 11/07/2004 10:32:29 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Now just why would he want to do that?

OUST SPECTER!!!!!!!!


7 posted on 11/07/2004 10:33:11 AM PST by Paperdoll (on the cutting edge - our fight has just begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneralHavoc

Ping


8 posted on 11/07/2004 10:33:35 AM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

I'm beginning to suspect that Specter is a dem mole.


9 posted on 11/07/2004 10:34:12 AM PST by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox

Many states already have procedures in place for felons to apply for reinstatement of voting rights. Something to do with petitioning the Governors of the states.


11 posted on 11/07/2004 10:38:04 AM PST by infidel29 (America is GREAT because she is GOOD, the moment she ceases to be GOOD, she ceases to be GREAT- B.F.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Bush's Blunder. Supporting a sphincter in the primary.


12 posted on 11/07/2004 10:38:15 AM PST by samtheman (www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I think it's time to "gray davis" this traitor.

az

13 posted on 11/07/2004 10:39:53 AM PST by Arizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This is disgusting. There is no justifiable reason to have this man involved in the selection of judges.
14 posted on 11/07/2004 10:41:17 AM PST by Enterprise (The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

When you lack a firm moral base on which to justify your opinions, appeal to emotion and mob hysteria must rule the day.

Unfortunately, I have a moral base. It includes the concepts of mercy, forgiveness, and when the punishment has been paid its been paid. Futhermore, it includes reason. There are too many false convictions, the ease of getting convictions on circumstantial evidence rises everyday, the duty of the jury decreases with the decadence of the sociey, and what is considered a felony is cheapened everyday.

And that last should be of concern to any thinking person. Felonies are no longer what the common man would term felonies, rape, murder, arson. Felonies everyday include more and more statutary crimes that could not be recognized in a state of nature as being crimes except by the arbitary decree of men.

In other words, if you can define anything you want as a felony, which is now the case, the governmnet could disenfrangize anyone it wants at any time by merely passing a law. Case in point, if gun ownership were a crime, all gun owners would lose the ability to vote. If talking about conservatism were a hate crime as some try to make it, all conservaties would lose the right to vote. If being a Christian minister without a license were a crime, all Christina ministers would lose the right to vote.

Spector is right to oppose preventing ex-felons (you will note the term ex in there as opposed to the title of this post, as the term ex opposes the appeal to emotion and creating mob hysteria, and seeks to impose the freedom loving virtue of reason). Futhermore, Spector is right in another regard. The federal governmnet has the right and duty to set its own standard for its own elections, and states must not be allowed to upsurb that.


15 posted on 11/07/2004 10:45:17 AM PST by gonow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

This is a State Sovereignity issue.


16 posted on 11/07/2004 10:47:19 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregGinn

McCain just isn't quite there (in spector's camp)
yet, but he's workin' on it.


17 posted on 11/07/2004 10:47:22 AM PST by the Deejay (ACLU = America's Clueless LUNATICS United.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

As a Conservative I believe people can change for the better. There's nothing wrong with non-violent felons getting their voting rights back so long as the nature of their crime is considered and an appropriate amount of time has transpired without any more offences. Of course, those who commit violent crimes should never be allowed to vote again. People do a lot of stupid things when they are young. I know many people who are completely different at age 35 than they were at age 20. I dare say there are many here at Free Republic who can look back with relief at some of the bullets they dodged when they were young and stupid. Once felons have completed their sentence and have maintained a clean record for a certain amount of years, they should be given a chance to participate again.


18 posted on 11/07/2004 10:48:41 AM PST by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
What should you expect from Ira Einhorn's former attorney?
19 posted on 11/07/2004 10:49:07 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

"Specter loves to collaboriate with the Democrats."

No reason. Attack on the person, not the issue.


20 posted on 11/07/2004 10:49:27 AM PST by gonow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson