Procter & Gamble pushes homosexual agenda

American Family Association ^ | 10/12/2004 | Don Wildmon

[unlearner]

P&G ACTIVELY RECRUITS THOSE WHO PRACTICE HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR TO BECOME EMPLOYEES

Procter & Gamble actively seeks out individuals who practice the abnormal and destructive homosexual lifestyle to come to work for the company. It is the only group P&G seeks to employ based on their behavior. P&G recruits from this group because they practice the homosexual lifestyle.

The company is currently running a promotion on the homosexual website GAYWORK.COM seeking employees whose sole distinguishing characteristic is sex with same-sex partners.

In addition, P&G is a major sponsor of Out & Equal, an organization that bills itself as one that "offers LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgendered) diversity training to companies that want to delve deeper into the special workplace issues faced by LGBT employees."

What kind of diversity training are P&G employees forced to attend? Here is a note from a P&G employee recently sent to us. "I'm a P&G employee at their (city) plant. I had to go to the captive audience Diversity class. The movie on homosexuals was very offensive to Christians. It showed a man in a collar (Catholic priest?) saying 'there is nothing in the Bible which says that homosexuality is wrong.'"

Why would P&G actively recruit those who engage in homosexual sex and force employees to attend a class that presents those who oppose the homosexual lifestyle in a negative light? Because P&G is committed to promoting the homosexual agenda.

In Cincinnati, Procter & Gamble is aggressively leading the fight to repeal a law that forbids giving special rights to homosexuals. P&G has given $10,000 to the political campaign to repeal the law. Citizens to Restore Fairness, the group pushing for special rights for homosexuals, is chaired by Gary Wright, an employee of P&G given a leave of absence to head the campaign. He is also a leader of P&G's corporate homosexual group GABLE/P&G.

P&G has thrown their full corporate weight behind the campaign to give special rights to homosexuals.

While P&G puts forth their best effort and money to get the law favoring homosexuals passed, they refuse to support the Ohio Marriage Protection Amendment which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman or to make a donation to the cause.

We encourage you to take the action steps listed below. Then forward this information to others on your email list. We need your help to get the word out on this unfortunate situation.

American Family Association is asking individuals to:

(1) Boycott three products of P&G — Crest toothpaste, Tide detergent, and Pampers diapers. (Many are boycotting all their products, which we encourage. Click here for a complete list of P&G products or look on the back of the product.)

(2) Call Chairman A.G. Lafley at 513-983-1100 and politely let him know that you are participating in the boycott and will ask others to do the same.

(3) Register your support for the boycott.

(4) Please forward this to your friends and family. They will have to see it to believe it, also.

(5) Print out and distribute the boycott Crest, Tide and Pampers petition.

American Family Association

[sasafras]

You are hypocrit - I love how you act like a Christian with your personal page and quoting the bible - but refuse to take a stand against evil in your personal life. Quit telling others what to do, if we dont want to buy P&G becuase their policies are anti-family then that is our right. Its people like you, who are more worried about what the stuff in their mouth vs. what goes into your head, that is dividing this country on moral and ethical grounds.

[little jeremiah]

First you said you have no connection to P&G, then you say you're a contractor for them and you're with them every day, and that your wife's best friend works for them. So every link and every fact presented above are all lies, invented out of thin air?

And we're supposed to believe you rather than AFA?

All because some anonymous guy on the internet says it's not true?

[Colofornian]

As you can tell, I don't really care about whom employers employ. I still shop at Nordstrom, even though they offer domestic partner health benefits, still do business with AT&T, etc.

The issue goes well beyond who you employ. These companies give grant monies to causes they endorse and sanction entire lifestyles, including the redefinition of marriage. Now these issues may not be provocative to you, either; but then you should be consistent. Don't complain if some group you don't like--say the KKK--funds your local storytime hour for children at your local library--commercial included! Now obviously I came up with an exaggerated example, but I'm just saying, if you're one of those "I don't draw a line in the sand on anything" people, just be consistent and don't draw lines in the sand in other venues then.

And next time your babysitter heads for the local crack house down the street w/the $ you just paid her, wash your hands of that, too. That was her money she just spent, after all, and, as you said, you don't care who you employ.

[scripter]

Perhaps P&G is really starting to feel the boycott...

[Bella_Bru]

And next time your babysitter heads for the local crack house down the street w/the $ you just paid her, wash your hands of that, too. That was her money she just spent, after all, and, as you said, you don't care who you employ.

I don't put crack addicts in the same category as homosexuals. Then again, many of my friends are eeeevil queers (as so affectionately called by some loving Christians around here).

[Aquinasfan]

I thought companies held sensitivity training in part to shield themselves from class action lawsuits.

That's the companies' motivation for providing the workshops. The programs aren't devised by the corporations, however.

Have You Been Delphi'd?

[Modernman]

Here is a list of P&G homo-support activities from the AFA:

Other than what is going on in Cincinnati, all of the other items on this list are nothing more than examples of a corporation paying politically correct hush money to a whiney minority group. If you think this is anything exceptional, then you don't know corporate America.

[Stone Mountain]

Sorry, I read your post a few times but I don't get your point. Is your point that boycotts really are effective? Is it that it doesn't matter if they are effective because they are right? I have no idea how what you posted relates to the point I made in post 72.

[Modernman]

Surely, at a time like this, there is so much more in the world to be concerned about aside from whether a man who makes washing-up liquid takes it up the bum?

For some Freepers, the fear that homosexuals will turn them and their children gay is all-consuming.

[Colofornian]

I don't put crack addicts in the same category as homosexuals.

So in other words, homosexuals can never be addicted sexually. Is that your conclusion? That homosexuality can never or commonly qualify as a sexual addiction for those folks? Wilt Chamberlain's thousands of heterosexual trysts was simply him acting upon his heterosexual orientation and was no sexual addiction; and likewise, homosexuals engaging in dozens or hundreds homosexual trysts over their lifetime likewise have no addiction. Is that your view?

[Modernman]

Sodomy is an out of control lust that consumes those who engage in it.

See what I mean about obsession?

[Modernman]

Sodomy is an out of control lust that consumes those who engage in it.

See what I mean about obsession?

[Modernman]

homosexuals engaging in dozens or hundreds homosexual trysts over their lifetime likewise have no addiction. Is that your view?

The vast majority of heterosexual men, if given the chance, would engage in hundreds of heterosexual trysts over their lifetimes.

The reason why homosexual men have so many partners is because they can.

[dubyain04jebin08and12]

I looked up the corporate equality index thing -- nice reference tool. P&G did indeed get an 86 on the most recent report but that was 2003, not 2004.

Was intrigued to see that Heinz scored a mere 29 -- rethinking my self-imposed boycott now! Other companies that deserve conservative support include Meijer (14), Exxon-Mobil (14), Domino's Pizza (14), Sprint (29), Maytag (29), and Staples (29).

[little jeremiah]

If I were a little more cynical, I might think that the main reason you hang out on FR is to promote the homosexual agenda and denigrate those who believe in God.

Ever read these words written by the founder and owner of Free Republic, Jim Robinson?

"As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc."

[little jeremiah]

Typical homo-promoting talking point. Accuse those who oppose the homo-agenda of being "obessed" - hinting some deep dark secret lust.

Well, if he is obsessed, why are you on this thread, making numerous comments, hmmmmm?

[unlearner]

"Then you might want to boycott everything. Most employers do not have an 'are you homosexual' question on their applications to weed out them eeeevil queers."

Not all businesses pledge to not discriminate based on sexual orientation. Of course this only refers to homosexuality. They will, of course, discriminate against child molesters, rapists, and people who engage in necrophilia and bestiality, for now.

Sodomy is not a special class of people. It is a type of behavior.

How would anyone know someone is engaging in this behavior? Only if they bring it into the workplace or become some sort of "activist" for homosexual sex privileges.

This type of policy let's homosexual "activists" know they are free to publicly promote their sexual agenda without fear of reprisal.

[Colofornian]

I read your post a few times but I don't get your point. Is your point that boycotts really are effective? Is it that it doesn't matter if they are effective because they are right? I have no idea how what you posted relates to the point I made in post 72.

All right. To summarize your points. You said (1)most boycotts are completely counter-productive [Certainly I can say that not all boycotts are productive]. (2) The Last Temptation of Christ would have been a movie that none of us had heard of except for the religious groups that protested it...for the most part, the publicity that boycotts create almost always backfires on the protestors.

You made a near absolute statement: "that boycotts create almost always backfires on the protesters."

If that was the case, any criticism of any horrid play, movie, TV show, book, Web site or supposed piece of art would almost never be justified, because publishing crits would always draw attention in feeding the publicity hounds of these products.

My analogy to Sodom & Gomorrah is that God gave His reacting to blasphemous, unnatural lifestyles and general evil in those communities plenty of press by destroying it.[The Bible is the world's best-seller, so you couldn't give it more press than that!]. In other words, God placed the ultimate boycott upon Sodom & Gomorrah so that no one would do business with that city again!

Are you saying that boycott by God backfired on Him? There are things so provocative that to not react means that we become numb, desensitized, and calloused about evil. When that happens, we all become like spiritual lepers who not only fail to feel and be sensitive to touch and pain, etc, but we spread that disease to others.

God felt that putting certain cities up on a pedastal as a negative example of a way to live [which is, simply put, the partial definition of a boycott], outweighed the fallout of shining a light on dark activity (cause any time you shine a light on dark activity, you also get the attention of the curiosity mongers).

Bad publicity is always two-sided. The curiosity-mongers interested in the latest worldly "revelation" are magnetized to the latest controversy. BUT! Filmmakers of potentially controversial products AND their corporate funders take note as well. Let's face it, network TV would be filled with even more outrageous showings if the networks thought they could do so controversy-free, because corporate America is still skittish to some degree. Attention drawn by lightning rods is not simply an overwhelming negative thing.

[little jeremiah]

You said:

"For some Freepers, the fear that homosexuals will turn them and their children gay is all-consuming."

More homo-promotion talking points.

Can you please cite some research disproving the many, many articles already posted on FR evidencing the fact that at least one third of child molesting is done by adults OF THE SAME SEX even though homosexuals are at most around 2% of the population?

You are nothing but a shill for the homosexual agenda and I'm sick of your trolling about it. Your comments are nothing but "gayspeak" and innuendo, as though you are a windup toy of the radical "gay" agenda.

[Bella_Bru]

Obsession with who is screwing who is also an addiction.