Posted on 10/12/2004 7:25:08 AM PDT by unlearner
P&G ACTIVELY RECRUITS THOSE WHO PRACTICE HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR TO BECOME EMPLOYEES
Procter & Gamble actively seeks out individuals who practice the abnormal and destructive homosexual lifestyle to come to work for the company. It is the only group P&G seeks to employ based on their behavior. P&G recruits from this group because they practice the homosexual lifestyle.
The company is currently running a promotion on the homosexual website GAYWORK.COM seeking employees whose sole distinguishing characteristic is sex with same-sex partners.
In addition, P&G is a major sponsor of Out & Equal, an organization that bills itself as one that "offers LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgendered) diversity training to companies that want to delve deeper into the special workplace issues faced by LGBT employees."
What kind of diversity training are P&G employees forced to attend? Here is a note from a P&G employee recently sent to us. "I'm a P&G employee at their (city) plant. I had to go to the captive audience Diversity class. The movie on homosexuals was very offensive to Christians. It showed a man in a collar (Catholic priest?) saying 'there is nothing in the Bible which says that homosexuality is wrong.'"
Why would P&G actively recruit those who engage in homosexual sex and force employees to attend a class that presents those who oppose the homosexual lifestyle in a negative light? Because P&G is committed to promoting the homosexual agenda.
In Cincinnati, Procter & Gamble is aggressively leading the fight to repeal a law that forbids giving special rights to homosexuals. P&G has given $10,000 to the political campaign to repeal the law. Citizens to Restore Fairness, the group pushing for special rights for homosexuals, is chaired by Gary Wright, an employee of P&G given a leave of absence to head the campaign. He is also a leader of P&G's corporate homosexual group GABLE/P&G.
P&G has thrown their full corporate weight behind the campaign to give special rights to homosexuals.
While P&G puts forth their best effort and money to get the law favoring homosexuals passed, they refuse to support the Ohio Marriage Protection Amendment which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman or to make a donation to the cause.
We encourage you to take the action steps listed below. Then forward this information to others on your email list. We need your help to get the word out on this unfortunate situation.
American Family Association is asking individuals to:
(1) Boycott three products of P&G — Crest toothpaste, Tide detergent, and Pampers diapers. (Many are boycotting all their products, which we encourage. Click here for a complete list of P&G products or look on the back of the product.)
(2) Call Chairman A.G. Lafley at 513-983-1100 and politely let him know that you are participating in the boycott and will ask others to do the same.
(3) Register your support for the boycott.
(4) Please forward this to your friends and family. They will have to see it to believe it, also.
(5) Print out and distribute the boycott Crest, Tide and Pampers petition.
American Family Association
Nobody at these corporations is forcing the gay agenda on anyone. You don't like your employer's policies? Feel free to quit.
Though you may not admit of any god, at least you're open that you're quite opposed to the God of the Bible. The God of the Bible is one who openly concedes on its pages that He is zealous. The Son of God of the Bible, Jesus Christ, even picked Simon the Zealot as one of His followers.
As long as you're on record as being firmly opposed to the God of the Bible and the historical figure of Jesus Christ, we know the essentials of your worldview in a nutshell.
I think you meant that for somebody else and not little jeremiah.
Are you consistent with that? I can just imagine a Christian employer bringing in an ex-homosexual at a mandatory diversity session to talk with employees, including 1-2% of homosexual employees, to let them know that homosexuals don't have to define themselves according to one paradigm. That this lifestyle can be left. And, you would say to homosexuals forced to attend one of these sessions, according to your logic, that "nobody at this corporation is forcing the Christian agenda on anyone. You don't like your employer's policies? Feel free to quit."
If you can say that in this scenario, then at least you are consistent in your worldview.
Read the thread and find out.
True, post 162 was meant for Modernman.
He didn't mean what you think, but sitting on the sidelines I can see why you might think otherwise.
I think you meant someone else? I am not only not opposed to God, but hold His commandments on my head as the only reality in life.
Not that I follow perfectly - but my ideal. (obviously!)
I also promote moral absolutes as essential for all humanity, and that these absolutes are not sectarian, but the same in every theist religion in the world.
Utter nonsense.
That is my position, yes.
So you do concede you are intolerant...you're just intolerant of things & folks distinct from what other intolerant folks are intolerant of...
So, where's the upper ground, again, of the so-called tolerance crowd? Where's the virtue, again, of being labeled as tolerant if you merely temporarily forget exactly those things & people of which you are intolerant?
Some of the tactics we commonly see here (and I'm not saying you've engaged in them) can be found here: The Homosexual Propaganda and Media Manipulation Game...
I was always under the impression you were consistent and this just reinforces that thought. As I see it, you're just consistently wrong on some things. ;-)
Statistically, men tend to be more promiscuous than women. When you double the males within the same sexual relationships, you greatly multiply promiscuity. When you multiply promiscuity, you invite emotional destruction over failed relationships, sexually transmitted diseases--including fatal diseases, etc.
When you redefine marriage as any number of people who love each other, you have just reopened polygamy plus added the list of qualified marital partners bigamists, polyamory, multiple partner marriages (8 men & 6 women), incest marriage, etc. You force schools to teach that all options are on the social table, and that invites further sexual confusion amongst young people. It's sexual chaos run amok! If marriage is just any number of people who love each other, then even the age of consent laws which homosexual activists oppose becomes just some arbitrary age decided by government. Why, then even minors have the right to marry under that feel-good definition.
Why not have 8 adult men marry 5 middle school boys and 3 high school girls in a group marriage? If you don't agree with that, what? Are you bigoted toward polyamorists? Don't you believe that folks with certain "sexual orientations" are just born that way? What's your hang up with some arbitrary age decided by a bunch of governmental bureaucrats? Why aren't you inclusive? Where are the rest of the colors of your rainbow? Why are you so intolerant as you neglect these other minority "sexual orientations"?
And don't give me any baloney about sexual abuse-with-minors laws on the books. We all know that when sodomy was illegal in certain states, you didn't give a rip about the fact that sodomy was legal in some states while it was illegal in other states. Nor did you give a rip that these corporations' national policies like domestic partnership benefits, non-discrimination policies including undefined "sexual orientations," and sanctioned alternative "sexual orientation" groups didn't distinguish between states where sodomy was legal and sodomy was illegal. If illegality was of a real concern to the homosexualization of America, then we would have heard qualifiers about state sodomy statutes all throughout the 90s. But we didn't. Not a peep.
The other side promotes sexual chaos and sexual confusion because it matches the enemy's agenda. Redefine everything. Crumble all remnants of this country's spiritual capital invested in it by the Founding Fathers.
Remember this, every argument raised by one sexual minority group can be applied across the board to any number of sexual orientations and family configurations. And I don't think children resulting from these social experimentations should be the continued social lab rats of anything-goes licentious living.
I was one of the "granddaddys" of Christian Conservatism, having studied at L'Abri just about the time of the "WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE HUMAN RACE" and consequent Christian involvement in the abortion issues. I helped FORM two Chrisitian Action Councils, and attended seminary with Paul Hill (the excommunicated presbyterian pastor who killed an abortionist). I have spoken personally, repeatedly, with Joe Scheidler on effective protest strategies...., so I can speak with some degree of knowing what I am talking about.
I find the right wing of evangelicals to be surface, silly, reactionary, uninformed, prey to hysterical fund raisers, and in short gullible enough to fall for crap like this over and over. Most live in a cultural (and physical!) ghetto, isolated from anything that remotely resembles a homosexual activism.
I spent years NOT responding to any number of Christian Conservative mailers. You get on these lists and they network you into a sea of rants about the evil scheming hate mongers so that you seriously begin to think that maybe we should bring back Torquemada and exterminate the leftist vermin. AFA is such a site. It doesn't "inform" so much as it shrieks at you. They pander to the pharisee in all of us.
Is the homosexual movement evil? OF COURSE it is! Is it culturally hegemonistic? SURE!! Is the left saturated with venom spitting God Haters? Absolutely. My problem with the Christian right is that they are fighting a war that was over 20 years ago. The secular, largely disinterested culture around you views you as the same type of moonbats as the homosexual loonies you are protesting. If the motivation of AFA is to stir up the base to send money, they do a good job. If the object is to COUNTER the influence of the left, my advice to the right wing is to get out of the Christian ghetto and become involved with, say, some inner city education project. Learn to love, teach, mento and provide leadership to some and get to know their families. Go to a black church (it will weird you out, but some of em preach the gospel in all that emotion), get to know Hispanics struggling to learn to fit in. Work a little in a hospice for dying AIDS patients (there are such things). Then you will be better able to respond and resist GRACIOUSLY to the attempts to subvert freedom and morality.... AND KNOW WHEN TO SHUT THE HELL UP!!!!
That will do more good than all the ranting sites who make their living cataloguing the demise of Western Culture.
As to whether P&G is overtly promoting perversion, it probably does. Lots of corporations do.
Then perhaps he could explain what he meant. Oh, not anti-homosexual? Must be one!
Yes, I know it's awful. I am intolerant of those that would wish to impinge upon my freedom to read, watch, attend what I want.
I ran a search for "must be one" and only found two hits from your posts (130 and 176). So maybe you're paraphrasing something he said...Do you have a post number?
Scripter is an honorable person who dedicates much time to the cause of promoting traditional morals for the betterment of all.
Thank you. As are you, my friend.
So, let's say you want to read/watch child pornography by the thousands of images, etc. The govt. is thereby restrictive to impose that censorship upon you were they to prosecute you, or, does, yes, the light turn on in your head that some forms of censorship are ones you readily consent to?
If this is your universal truism, under what circumstances do you cave in and say, "Well, I guess my worldview is not true across the board--at least in many circumstances it just doesn't hold up no matter how quickly I quaintly quote it."
Let's say, you want to attend a tourism event now labeled child sexual tourism, where folks go to a different country simply to engage in child sexuality. Is that, too, is something you're intolerant of re: the govt. because they now have laws vs. child sexual tourism?
Do you see how silly it is to make open-ended statements like yours and think that they are somehow universal truisms & principles that all folks should buy into? That's the problem when you make up ethics as you go along. Folks, upon jettisoning strong moral standards, absolutes and ethics, have nothing left to grab onto in the new moral vacuum. Instead, they grasp any subjective conviction that manages to stay with them longer than a few days.
The problem is that you find out it's not a universal code when you start applying it to certain situations. It doesn't hold true across the board. It then becomes just another handy-dandy pocket slogan that might be true for you today, but not tomorrow.
Such is the life of a relavist. No real foundation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.