[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for posting this article -- saw it this morning from GOPUSA and was hoping someone would post it.

The Democrat candidates all of them are so far left that I cannot even fathom having any of them in office as President.

[Sabertooth]

Why do we have to focus on only one picture?

I want to reelect Bush and see his Amnesty defeated.

Is that wrong?

[Reagan Man]

>>>The Democrat candidates all of them are so far left that I cannot even fathom having any of them in office as President.

Almost the exact same words I posted the other day.

What are the alternatives? John Kerry. Howard Dean. John Edwards. Wes Clark. Or maybe Harry Browne. Howard Philips. John Hagelin. Hmmm.

Need I remind the perpetually pissed off faction of the political rightwing, America is at war. The President and his administration have done a remarkable job in handling the aftermath of 9-11, prosecuting the war on terrorism and stimulating the economy out of recession.

Protest votes aren't the answer in 2004. Bush and Company deserve reelection. There are no viable alternatives for conservatives.

[Aeronaut]

The Democrat candidates all of them are so far left that I cannot even fathom having any of them in office as President.

What scares me more than a democrat president is a democrat commander-in-chief.

[MeekOneGOP]

Of course, the poll is meaningless in the sense that President Bush has not yet begun to campaign, but it does add fuel to the fire that 2004 could be as close as the historic elections of 2000. With that in mind, it's time for conservatives across the country to focus on the big picture and realize that a Bush loss is far worse than a Bush victory.

I think too many folks here don't understand this.
NONE of the 'RAT candidates are worth their weigh in horse manure ! ...

[AuntB]

Hey, Mom, thanks for the ping. Yes, I will vote for George Bush. I will hold my nose as I do it. He's as out of touch with reality as most politicians. And he will do as much harm as his supporters allow him to do.

[deport]

Well what do you know....... Two positive articles in one day from two that normally take the President to task often.. Bobby Earle and Pat Buchanan

Bookmarking........

[blackie]

Well said PhiKapMom!

The RATS Are In Disarray ~ Eradicate The Rodents!

Fire Democrats ~ Hire Republicans!

[mhking]

The Democrat candidates all of them are so far left that I cannot even fathom having any of them in office as President.

Being a true conservative (or a true Republican, even) doesn't mean rolling over and playing dead just because our conservative/Republican President makes a proposal that conservatives think is wrong-headed (i.e., the amnesty proposal) doesn't make us any less conservative.

We have a responsibility to make suggestions that the leadership should take to heart for the betterment of the party/cause.

I have no problem with supporting the Administration on reelection. I want to see the President reelected.

But I'm not about to bare my throat in a submissive gesture just because illegal aliens are now suddenly "guest workers". If the Administration does something that I think is wrong, it's my responsibility to make certain that they know how I feel.

I trust them to do what needs to be done, but I also trust them to listen to the people as well.

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

[alwaysconservative]

Thanks for the ping! This is surprisingly fair, considering it is from a usual Bush critic (at least, from what I understand).