Posted on 06/08/2003 12:01:06 AM PDT by Martus
Ok everyone, I'm thinking out loud here.
I've heard so much on the news about the evidence for WMDs which was the reason for the war is shaky.
I'd hate to think that I was lied to. I've been all for President Bush in whatever he's done. But if it comes out that there was really no evidence and that we've been lied to, I'll be VERY P.O.'ed.
Anyone else thinking this way? Help!!
I am like Daschle, 'deeply saddened' that some of our Freepers are falling for this notion that Dubya might have lied about WMD. This will be the main topic of every talk show this morning. Talk about piling on.
It is stunning to think that anyone would believe that Bush would jepordize lives in the military to score political points. If they really know who Goerge Bush is they wouldn't think that way at all. This man has too much respect for the military, and for life in general to even consider such a possibility.
Certainly Clinton has done much to damage the credibility of the office of the Presidency. This is the legacy he has left, and it will take someone like George W. Bush to turn this mess around.
The Democrats making the charges that Bush lied have shamed themselves into licking Clinton's shoes, and defending all the garbage he has heaped upon the American people, that nothing they say anymore will be credible to me. Nothing!
Jay
The information some of the critics are saying wasn't good is also nonsense. The genius of the war plan indicates the opposite. They hit Saddam's means of communication so effectively that he was unable from the first minutes of the war to communicate with any of his fighting units, making him like a blind man groping around in the dark.
We also know that this win not only liberates the Iraqi people from an oppessive tyrant, it also gives foreign policy from here on out more teeth.
The ineffective, comtemptible foreign policy from the Clinton Administration will be but a blot on the landscape before too long.
Iraq was a friend of Al Qaeda. If we are going to win the war against terrorism, we must attack the terrorists and their friends at every good opportunity. We must keep attacking and killing them until they are all dead or until they surrender. Even if there had never been WMDs, attacking an ally of Al Qaeda was a good policy. We showed those worthless losers that being our enemy is a dangerous thing.
As we discover more mass graves of people killed in the Iraqi holocaust, it amazes me that people are still harping so much about the WMDs. I sometimes think that if FDR had been a conservative, these people would have stood in the ashes of the concentration camps and questioned whether we were right to defeat Hitler. We did the right thing in putting the former Iraqi regime out of power. We destroyed a madman's power base, somewhat avenged many who had died, and saved many who would have been killed in the future.
We did the right thing. All of this questioning is ridiculous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.