[Lorena]

Thanks for bringing that post over here. It is truly sickening and I'm sure went on all over the state. Unfortunately, the poster says in a later message that her poll worker source "doesn't want to get involved" and won't report her observations.

It is my understanding from following the posts of Congressman Billybob, an FR legal expert with much experience in the high courts, that the recount occurs automatically because of the small difference in the votes between the candidates. (Some are disputing that Thune must request the recount within 3 days - I'm not sure who's right about that.) Thune will then have the remedy of the courts, if need be, after the recount. See here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/783854/posts?page=61#61 and you can also click on his screen name for other informative posts on this topic.

[Molly Pitcher]

Lorena, the R's must follow this thru, don't you think?Maybe that pollworker will change her mind....if not, there are other sources for answers and evidence.

The Corrupt Party must be stopped this time for committing this kind of fraud.

[Mr. Mulliner]

I saw after I posted that previous comment that there will be an automatic recount and that makes much more sense. (I would have corrected myself if I hadn't been knocked off line.) I'm sure that the Republicans have been very aware of the vote fraud there and are keeping their options open and doing what they can to overcome the cheating.

[Common Tator]

Daschles first run was recount and ended up in the US senate for a Decision.

It took a year after Daschle was elected the first time for him to take his seat. The Democrats controlled the Senate and voted to seat him.

The race in South Dakota is a long way from over. The last time it was this close in South Dakota it was Tom Daschle who was the D candidate and it took him a year to actually gain his seat.