Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Smart Thread, 9/17/02 to ???

Posted on 09/16/2002 11:10:48 PM PDT by Utah Girl

Just thought I would start a new thread.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,081-1,092 next last
To: All
http://166.70.46.216/2002/jun/06212002/utah/747142.htm

The National Enquirer tabloid newspaper is expected to publish a story today about the contents of the computer, said Det. Dwayne Baird.

I was rereading old newspaper issues and came across this. Check it out. I find a few odd things about this article, one is the above statement.
221 posted on 09/19/2002 12:41:07 PM PDT by scaredkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: All
does anyone have this story from NE. They pulled it from the shelfs here and I didnt get to read it.
222 posted on 09/19/2002 12:45:57 PM PDT by scaredkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: All
I just heard a rumor that is going on around here. (recieved info by phone.) That lois and ed have gone on a vacation leaving their kids with family members and have gone on a cruise. Ed was quoted saying he wishes this would all go away. Maybe this is why there are no family news conferences, so noone will ask where are the parents.

???????he wishes it would go away??????? I would think he would have other kind of wishes. Like finding his daughter. I dont know, Ed sure says the stranges things.


I have the foxnews on, no mentions about elizabeth yet.
223 posted on 09/19/2002 1:16:11 PM PDT by scaredkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Sherlock
You are right. I won't go by what men say including you. Sorry to get under your skin. That is not my intention. It is a shame the bible in the old testament mentions so many polygamists that God worked with. There have been sacred places where some people were not allowed to enter, and also only certain men could offer sacrifice that God would accept.

And by the way I do worship the Jesus of the new testament. I owe him everything. I read of him daily and try to act like him, though I fall woefully short of his example. I know that his name is the only one given whereby we can receive salvation. He is the one who can forgive my sins.

I have no argument with you and once again thank you for your input!
224 posted on 09/19/2002 1:58:50 PM PDT by klamath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

Comment #225 Removed by Moderator

To: Utah Girl; Devil_Anse; scaredkat; sandude; varina davis
Ralph Lauren sports shoes are made/marketed by Reebok -- quite likely with identical treads and other features, and just some cosmetic differences. A Senior Vice President of Reebok is the President & Chief Executive of Ralph Lauren Footwear Co. (presumably a subsidiary of Reebok).

http://www.reebok.com/US/AtReebok/InvestorRelations/Corporate+Officers.htm
226 posted on 09/19/2002 2:50:03 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: scaredkat
I thought at last week's press conference, Ed and Lois weren't there, they were on a family vacation with their kids. They may still be gone.
227 posted on 09/19/2002 2:52:30 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Ah, thanks for clearing that question up. I figured it didn't matter if they were Reeboks or Ralph Lauren, they'd look pretty much the same.
228 posted on 09/19/2002 2:53:37 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

Comment #229 Removed by Moderator

To: klamath
I won't go by what men say including you.

If you will truly seek the truth, and ask God to show it to you, and are willing to accept it even if it means giving up family and friends, He will be faithful to show you the truth.

Sorry to get under your skin. That is not my intention.

You didn't get under my skin. But I will admit I will be glad to try to scare the hell out of you if it will keep you from going there.

It is a shame the bible in the old testament mentions so many polygamists that God worked with.

The polygamists of the Old Testament paid for their polygamy. Abraham had Ishmael by his slave wife at Sarah's request and look what trouble that caused in his family and in the Middle East today with the offspring of Ishmael still fighting against the offspring of Isaac. Jacob had two wives because he got tricked by his father in law and had to marry both and endured a lifetime of bickering and competition between the wives, even using their servants to sire him children in their competition with one another. Regardless, the New Testament clearly states that church leaders are to be men with one wife.

There have been sacred places where some people were not allowed to enter, and also only certain men could offer sacrifice that God would accept.

All the men were the Lords', but they were all redeemed by silver except the Levites who were God's representatives to the people. It was by birthright, not by whether they paid their tithes and did not smoke, did not chew, and did not date girls that do. This was all clearly prescribed and delineated in scripture, just as it is delineated that there is no temple in the church age, we are the temple of the Holy Spirit as living stones. Only the priests were allowed to enter the holy place, and only the High Priest was allowed once a year in the holy of holies. This is because he was a type of Jesus Christ. They did not have weddings that excluded family members. This, like the people killing their children sacrificing to Molech, would fall in the same category where God said he did not make commandment against it because it would never have entered his mind they would do anything like this. If you're trying to follow the law, remember if you offend in one point you have offended in all.

And by the way I do worship the Jesus of the new testament. I owe him everything.

The Jesus of the New Testament is an eternal member of the Godhead which LDS denies. The Jesus of the New Testament would not have you in your own little group not affiliating with and working together with other Christian groups worldwide. This exclusiveness, secrecy, and men trying to draw men after themselves is a real bad sign.

I read of him daily and try to act like him..

Where do you read 'of him', in the Word of God or in some LDS literature written by men?

I have no argument with you and once again thank you for your input!

I have no argument with you and it's interesting to hear the arguments you have in defense of your religion.

230 posted on 09/19/2002 3:26:52 PM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
I hope something happens in this case soon so there can be something more substantive to discuss than whether Liz' sneakers were Reeboks or Ralph Lauren. LOL
231 posted on 09/19/2002 3:29:02 PM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

Comment #232 Removed by Moderator

To: scaredkat
Other aspects of the investigation have involved driving Mary Katherine around the Smart neighborhood in hopes of finding a route the two sisters took when they went jogging the night before the abduction, Dinse said.

Could this be the reason the family was late for the school event, scaredkat? The girls were out jogging?

233 posted on 09/19/2002 4:00:59 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I thought at last week's press conference, Ed and Lois weren't there, they were on a family vacation with their kids. They may still be gone.

Seems like that would be quite an extended holiday during a school year!

234 posted on 09/19/2002 4:03:32 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: jengaio
Last week at the press conference, whoever conducted it said that Ed and Lois AND their five children were on a private vacation together, and that is why they weren't there.
235 posted on 09/19/2002 4:05:41 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
I really thought the news said they had, had planned a family vacation but wasnt going because Elizabeth is still missing.

The rumor is separate from the family vacation thing.
236 posted on 09/19/2002 4:07:13 PM PDT by scaredkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: scaredkat
So the family went on vacation last week (I am quoting the spokesperson at the press conference), and then Ed and Lois went on a cruise this week? Just want to get my facts straight.
237 posted on 09/19/2002 4:09:45 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Aha! I was wondering if this seeming change from Ralph Lauren to Reebok was really just a case of our forgetting how much collaboration and overlap there is btw brand names, etc.

Thanks for clearing that up.
238 posted on 09/19/2002 4:13:39 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Thats what Im wondering?
239 posted on 09/19/2002 4:18:25 PM PDT by scaredkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: All
I don't get this stuff about the vacation. Right around Labor Day, I heard the family was on vacation. That didn't seem a strange time to take a trip, since a lot of people like to finish out their summer that way. But Labor Day has come and gone, are they still not back??

It would indeed be hard to care about a trip, with a crisis like a missing family member ruining every day. We just had some work done on the house, and even that was such a pain that it made me forget about taking one last trip to finish out the summer (which I'd been considering.) Needless to say, their crisis is of a magnitude that I can't even imagine.

Maybe what they actually did was finally move out of that house, as they'd planned. If the school-age kids were doing homeschooling at this point, I'd certainly understand that. Maybe they've actually moved, and just aren't ready to tell the public yet.

Because if they really went on a cruise, I'd have to agree with Jengaio--even if one spouse knew something, what about the other one? How could she even pretend to put a happy face on for a cruise, in such conditions?

Also, I recall saying one time that in my opinion, the fact that they were able to take trips indicated that they probably aren't on the ropes financially. But a lot of people disagreed, saying they really hadn't taken but one trip this summer.
240 posted on 09/19/2002 4:26:35 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,081-1,092 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson