Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: shezza
... Watkins's testimony indicates he never saw the disks in question until Youngflesh waved around an envelope and said, "Aha! Look what I found!" ...
What kind of moron keeps secret stuff "hidden" in that sort of highly visible manner...or writes down all his passwords and stores them in a highly visible white envelope sticking up on the shelf? ...

Yep. the Youngflesh "evidence" smells like yesterdays fish.

But the password thing is normal. I've seen clients who'll put their password on a post-it note on their monitor, or pencil it on the keyboard.
Stealth Ninja Dave is slipping.

121 posted on 08/16/2002 9:29:19 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Doesn't sound like a good hiding place. If I was DW and truly wanted it well hidden, wouldn't I put it in a locked file cabinet for instance?
122 posted on 08/16/2002 9:29:26 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Ah, I completely forgot that Neal said he had looked at a few of the pix. Mea culpa. (However, I still stand by my premise that Youngflesh could have planted additional photos, as he had them in his possession for who knows how long before he presented them with a flourish to Watkins.) Thanks for the correction.
123 posted on 08/16/2002 9:29:33 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
As far as I know, the PH testimony is not a part of the actual trial so they wouldn't get to see it.
124 posted on 08/16/2002 9:31:14 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Comment #125 Removed by Moderator

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

To: Admin Moderator
Whoops..sorry AM..I didn't see your post. I'll behave..

sw

127 posted on 08/16/2002 9:32:31 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
That's what I was afraid of. :-( Bummer.

But it does enlighten us, and apparently Feldman is on to them. If the jury comes back with guilty, this would still be useful on appeal or in other future litigations on Westerfield's behalf.

thanks, Jaded.
128 posted on 08/16/2002 9:33:37 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: All
Juror Profiles
129 posted on 08/16/2002 9:33:56 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
I still want to know why the FBI was involved from Day 1. The reason they got involved so quickly with Elizabeth Smart case is because police thought she could have been taken across state line, thereby requiring FBI. Who asked for the Feds? I am sure they were not justing driving thru the neighborhood and noticed some activity on the Van Dam's street and stopped to see if they could help.
130 posted on 08/16/2002 9:35:10 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I'm curious about what else was on the loose media. I remember there were folders called "Neal's music". IMO, what happened was a blind back up was done of data files and poof!!! They weren't exactly hidden.

The other thing, when you get new software or signup for stuff online they tell you to write down your name, password and sn (if needed) and keep it in a safe place. Back-ups, passwords in envelope. Duh. Face it, it was on the shelf standing up with the books so LE would say it was hidden. Heck they'd probably say that if it was on top.
131 posted on 08/16/2002 9:35:47 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Me too...(reluctantly...no more having fun!)
132 posted on 08/16/2002 9:36:05 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Thank you so much for posting the links that reveal some of the shenanigans that have occurred in SD County.

If these well documented incidents don't at least give pause to the "hang 'em now" crowd, they simply choose to deny reality.

133 posted on 08/16/2002 9:37:39 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
WOMAN STRANGLED

A young woman is strangled; her naked body dumped near Balboa Golf Course and the killer is still on the loose.

It's been a year and a half since a police found the body of Diane Ayers, 23, off Golf Course Drive. Ayers lived with her mother in South Park, just nine blocks away from the spot where her body was found.

Almost every weekend, Diane would go country dancing in Mission Valley and police suspect she may have met up with a stranger.

It was Labor Day weekend, 1999 on a Saturday afternoon. A group of golfers discovered the naked body of Diane Marie Ayers in the bushes off the side of the road near Balboa Golf Course. Her body was found nude, but according to pathologists, she was not sexually assaulted.

Diane was 23 years old at the time of her death, but she looked much younger. Based on evidence at the scene, police believe Diane was strangled at a different location. The killer probably drove her to the golf course area because it was dark. He then pulled in to a dirt turnout by the side of the road and dragged her body into the bushes.

She had one white sock on her left foot. Investigators never found the rest of her clothes or the blue-gray backpack that she always carried.

Diana was last seen by her mother two days before the murder. Carol Ayers says she has no idea why someone would want to hurt her daughter.

Diane used to shop at Horton Plaza and she would go country dancing in Mission Valley at a bar called "In Cahoots." She also hung out at a bar called "Snippy's" on Fern Street near her mother's home. The manager remembers Diane coming in and says she never drank alcohol. She simply ordered a soda and listened to music while waiting for her bus.

Diane did not have a driver's license and sometimes walked the streets by herself at night, returning home from a bus stop. Police say that may have been how she encountered her killer.

Diane had friends in the military and liked military people. But Carol Ayers says her daughter would never take rides with strangers. Now, a year and a half after Diane's murder her family and friends are still searching for answers.

134 posted on 08/16/2002 9:37:43 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; shezza
If you do type up a summary of the findings, please ping me to it. I'm having a hard time keeping up on all this; but what I read here is in direct conflict with what many of the so-called "experts" are spouting on evening TV.
135 posted on 08/16/2002 9:37:57 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Good point, Knut. Could they have been called by the same person who decided not to test the unknown fingerprints and dna in the VD's house?

Could it be the same person who is yanking Mudd's chain about sequestration?

Could it be the same person who said go after DW and no one else?

Just asking.....
136 posted on 08/16/2002 9:39:56 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: All
Got an abuse report that said (I edited it a bit here):

When you addressed your "be good" comment... you can see if you go back and read some of the newbie posts, why there might be flames.

That's fine. All I am saying is that we want to keep the primary forums free of flame wars. If there is a desire to have free-for-all style discussion, perhaps the thing to do would be to repost this thread over in the Smoky Back Room. Thanks, AM

137 posted on 08/16/2002 9:40:40 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Thanks, I all ready read that...Scary isn't it..
138 posted on 08/16/2002 9:41:19 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
Meant to address the other post to All, not you specfically.
139 posted on 08/16/2002 9:42:04 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
As for your post #80, that guy would definitely not be a 'hung juror'.
140 posted on 08/16/2002 9:42:06 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson