The point is, it wouldn't take long at all to have literally thousands of these small photos. If I spent one hour a month over a few years I'd have many many such photos. Someone could make the case that I was fixated on these shots, focusing on the worst ones they could find. And I wouldn't have any defense that anyone would reasonably believe. Well, this may not mean much to some people. Others will know what I'm trying to say. Appearances can be very decieving. Making a bonified case out of questionable material can be very misleading. I have no way of knowing if Westerfield is as bad as he is portrayed to be. He may be. I'm not convinced.My thoughts in a similar vein struck a chord with some others on last evenings thread. See my post found on the previous thread at #638 and response comments at #643, #661, #718, and #730. There may more than a just few men who think that this may be a horrible mistake on the part of the police, but we don't know for sure, do we?
You know Dave, it makes me much more comfortable to come to these threads and see some bonified questions and theories such as yours posted, than to simply see a bunch of angry comments tilted toward Westerfield frying like he was the guilty party for sure. None of us want to see the perp get away in this case. What we want is to see justice served.
I can identify with your comments. I am guarded about my actions around children. I don't put myself in positions where people could possible wonder if I had done something wrong either. Hey, that's the world we live in fella.
Thanks for the comments.