Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sandude
I think if LE knew that Ricci was not involved they would make an announcement clearing him.

As I've speculated in prior posts, I don't think that's necessarily so, if they're trying to make a possible (as yet unnamed) abductor feel less threatened.

104 posted on 08/03/2002 9:15:15 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: varina davis
I don't think that's necessarily so, if they're trying to make a possible (as yet unnamed) abductor feel less threatened.

Yes weve had this discussion. I maintain that Ricci's lawyer would be raising hell if they were letting his client twist in the wind for no good reason.

107 posted on 08/03/2002 9:32:55 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: varina davis
As I've speculated in prior posts, I don't think that's necessarily so, if they're trying to make a possible (as yet unnamed) abductor feel less threatened.

LE said they have evidence Ricci was involved but not enough to indict him. Any theory that somehow Ricci wasn't involved is purely wishful thinking.

111 posted on 08/03/2002 9:47:28 PM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson