Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLurker
Actually that doesn't stand to reason. Looking at the picture it would appear that the road is what I'd call a "Kansas tunnel" (ie the road appears to be the lowest thing in the picture). If you have two hills and a valley inbetween the view either hill has of the other has no connection at all to the view the valley has of either. Even were it a constant direction (if the road were uphill from the circle and the circle uphill from the road, which is clearly not the case here, the road is definitely below the circle the only question is how much) unless the slope is consistent the view from one again has no direct corrolation with the view from the other. And in either case we still have no pictures of the circle area from either Stonehenge or the road, so even if your assumed corrolation were correct (which it isn't) that leans nothing since we are only guessing as to the view from either.
623 posted on 08/06/2002 3:57:41 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Placemarker. (Why am I still here?)
624 posted on 08/06/2002 4:00:17 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]

To: discostu
Anybody got a topographical map of the area?
628 posted on 08/06/2002 5:18:23 PM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson