Just wanted to keep FReepers abreast of the situation.
1 posted on
05/14/2002 9:07:47 AM PDT by
LavaDog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: LavaDog
Thanks for the mammaries...
2 posted on
05/14/2002 9:08:38 AM PDT by
Clemenza
To: LavaDog
You realize, of course, that stories like these must have photos....
To: LavaDog
"We're seeing way too many breasts."
Speak for your self kimosave! HA HA!
To: LavaDog
She sounds like a real boob ....
sorry, cheap joke. Couldn't resist.
6 posted on
05/14/2002 9:13:54 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: LavaDog
Photos please.
8 posted on
05/14/2002 9:17:13 AM PDT by
USAF_ret
To: LavaDog
What a tittilating article.
10 posted on
05/14/2002 9:19:13 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
To: LavaDog
I demand an end to breast feeding in public. When those damn babies are feeding, I can't see the breasts! All womens breasts should be completely covered. Preferably in a wet, thin white tee shirt.
12 posted on
05/14/2002 9:22:43 AM PDT by
blackdog
To: LavaDog
Titalating post....
To: LavaDog; Registered
To: LavaDog
We re seeing way too many breasts.No man will ever say this!
To: maxwell; hobbes1; dubyaismypresident
Are y'all keeping abreast of this situation?
To: LavaDog
When a society adopts the manners, music and morals of what was once confined to the "National Geographic"; what should we expect.
To: LavaDog
I'm not sure I agree. All this breast fetishism is a relatively modern phenomenon. The biological purpose of a woman's breasts is, after all, to feed her babies.
In the Middle Ages there were numberless paintings of the Blessed Virgin Mary breastfeeding the infant Jesus.
After the Reformation, Protestants objected, and to prevent scandal, many of these Catholic paintings were removed or destroyed in the Counter-Reformation. It's too bad, really, because this destructive iconoclasm was nothing but modern prudery. God made sexuality, although like everything else that He made good it can be perverted, and God instituted marriage and commanded us to increase and multiply.
So, discreet breastfeeding of an infant seems fine to me.
24 posted on
05/14/2002 9:41:54 AM PDT by
Cicero
To: LavaDog
This is silly. I've nursed both of my children in public. I am an incredibly modest woman, but I see no reason to deprive my baby of food simply because some people might be squeamish. Pam Anderson in a tube top has much more acceptance in our society than me feeding my baby at the mall.
The woman exposing herself in public is obviously an exhibitionist. That is what she should be taking issue with, not the breastfeeding.
To: LavaDog
I suppose you're more right than not.
And while I think breasts are wonderful creations, unless they are on my wife, they don't really tickle my fancy. And since she's now someone else's wife, breasts leave me rather fancy-less. . . except as beautiful parts of God's creation. . . nice lines and all that. . . hey--I'm artistic, OK?
Anyway--think of all the Ubangy's in Africa--or whatever tribes wherever where breasts are daily no big thing sexually. . . regardless of their size. A lot of the hoopla is so much conditioning and custom. . . . and if we can become conditioned to give a certain response, we can become unconditioned.
I think probably some decorum and kindness with regard to varied levels and types of sensitivities about breasts in public should be a consideration/politeness issue for anyone pretending to be civil or civilized.
But given so called women's lib and all the other selfish-ism's afoot rather rampantly these days, I wouldn't count on some women being overly thoughtful or complient with any notion of politeness. I mean, can you imagine Bella Abzug ever setting foot in the galactic cluster of politeness?
Dolly Parton, she's polite all over and in plenty of the right places and ways.
Obviously there's a polite way to flaunt it and a crass way to flaunt it.
But the cake was taken by about a 6 year old still nursing one of my friends. . . who in the grocery store or where-ever thought nothing--shockingly with mother's sanction--of saying:
"Mommy, I'm hungry, give me a breast, I wanna suck! RATHER LOUDLY."
That crossed my line rather wholesale--neither mother nor son seemed to think the concept of decorum existed for them at all.
30 posted on
05/14/2002 9:47:47 AM PDT by
Quix
To: LavaDog
If bare breasts were to become a common sight, we wouldn't think about it so much.
Do away with the indecent exposure laws, allow women as well as men to jog or swim topless. Equal rights and all that.
Eventually little kids, teenage boys and concerned moms would not give it a second thought.
31 posted on
05/14/2002 9:47:52 AM PDT by
R. Scott
To: LavaDog
'keepsemfromfloppin'
(German for bra)
To: LavaDog
"That day I had to do a double take. "
A somewhat pointed remark. Grrrroan. Did I she say that ? LOL.
38 posted on
05/14/2002 9:53:11 AM PDT by
Darlin'
To: LavaDog
I have a friend who saw a woman breastfeeding at the mall. He walked by her, grabbed his crotch and said "OH YEAH!!". He said the look on her face was priceless.
Hey, it's only natural.
To: LavaDog
Obviously the breast exposure of women is not the issue. The critical determinant as to offensiveness is that of a third party who is not getting 'nourished' by the breast, or has 'trouble' dealing properly with the situation.
We must each take individual responibility for the handling of such issues as they present themselves.
43 posted on
05/14/2002 10:01:55 AM PDT by
d14truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson