Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is banning Muslim stores and restaurants the answer?
World Net Daily ^ | 10/16/2026 | Laura Hollis

Posted on 10/17/2026 4:31:29 AM PDT by Adder

And yet we now have cities governed by Muslims: Dearborn and Hamtramck, Michigan, for example. The current mayor of Dearborn, Abdullah Hammoud, was videotaped at a mosque recently, saying, "If the Muslim community votes, if the Arab community votes, we will determine every single position in the whole city." (My friend Margot Cleveland, who lives in Dearborn, has sued the Muslim-dominated city government, alleging that it preferentially promotes Islamic religious displays while being "hostile to Christians and Jews" by forbidding the display of their religious holiday symbols.)

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: islam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Adder

I oppose banning Muslim-owned shops, especially restaurants and pastry shops. Yum!


21 posted on 10/17/2026 6:08:47 AM PDT by Chengdu54 (This is a time for which the 2nd Amendment was intended. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Banning islam and deporting muslims is the answer.


22 posted on 10/17/2026 6:13:28 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Muslims are of a higher rank than homosexuals in the liberal pecking order. So a homosexual couple turned down by a Muslim owned bakery has no legal recourse.
Now maybe a transgender who is non-white may be a higher rank than a Muslim.


23 posted on 10/17/2026 6:20:43 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Adder

No. Banning muslim immigration and mass deporting muslims is the answer.


24 posted on 10/17/2026 6:26:56 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdzla

A Federal Ban on Sharia Law must be passed ASAP.


25 posted on 10/17/2026 6:28:53 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Probably could get away with banning halal slaughter as cruelty to animals and month long fasting as cruelty to children.
More than that I doubt Americans have the stomach for it (forcibly removing Muslims)


26 posted on 10/17/2026 6:36:38 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

27 posted on 10/17/2026 6:37:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills and jihadists anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Adder

No. Banning MUSLIMS is the answer.

Starting on 9/12/01 all non-citizen Muslims should have been rounded up and deported, and all citizen Muslims placed under surveillance.


28 posted on 10/17/2026 6:41:14 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Banning Muzzie stores and restaurants is definitely not the answer. The answer to the Muzzies is deportations, and classification of the Bad Book as a cult, not a religion entitled to religious protection. Do it before they do it to other true religions and impose sharia law on us infidels.


29 posted on 10/17/2026 6:45:11 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

We have to stop calling it a religion.

It’s a political and cultural movement only.

There’s where we win when it can be a Supreme Court verdict!!!
The world would also win from forgoing the religion title. It’s false and we need to call evil evil and good good!!!

Go back to what I think John Adams said about The Constitutional Republic only being good for a Christian and moral population.


30 posted on 10/17/2026 6:49:59 AM PDT by YouGoTexasGirl ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Banning Islam is the answer. It is a totalitarian political system that uses religion as a beard, and is at complete odds with Western Civilization and the U.S. Constitution. Giving it 1A religion protected status is absurd.


31 posted on 10/17/2026 6:52:51 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Exactly!
Historical they come in to be rescued. They mass populate quickly. They run for office, get elected in block voting. They buy a little real estate but also because they rent a lot of spaces- commercial and residential, they increase crime and drive the ones living there out. Mosques and takeover.

Indonesia, Philippians, Middle East, Detroit, DFW-Ft. Worth, Dearborn, etc....


32 posted on 10/17/2026 6:54:44 AM PDT by YouGoTexasGirl ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Adder

They will use elections and rhe law when they work, and where those fail, they will killl you.

In the name of Allah.

The only “Principle” they have is the Will To Power.

Exactly like the Democrat Party.


33 posted on 10/17/2026 7:00:50 AM PDT by _longranger81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _longranger81

Banning moozlumz is the answer.


34 posted on 10/17/2026 7:20:16 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

I bet all goats would let out a sigh of relief if all moozlums were banned.


35 posted on 10/17/2026 7:22:18 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Is banning Muslim stores and restaurants the answer?

No. Banning Muslims is the answer!


36 posted on 10/17/2026 7:42:15 AM PDT by null and void (Do we vote for the people who want to hurt us, or vote for the people who don’t want to stop them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

In that effort it should be:
1) Unapologetic
2j Clear that Sharia law is inconsistent with U.S. law.
3) Aggressively enforced


37 posted on 10/17/2026 7:43:06 AM PDT by Made In The USA (One and Two and Three and Four and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Adder

38 posted on 10/17/2026 8:02:15 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They Did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

The answer is banning Muslims. 🙄


39 posted on 10/17/2026 8:13:55 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Separation of church and state, prohibition of non-profit 501c3 has always been nebulous. The IRS would come down hard on some non-profits but allow politicians to campaign from the pulpit in other cases.

Some communities have come to accept as normal politics from the pulpit. Tomorrow voters will be bussed from their church to the early voting site... and those buses will only be at certain churches and not other churches.

Is it time to clarify the separation, or no separation of church and state? At the State level? At the Federal level? In honest discussions in the media?


40 posted on 10/17/2026 8:22:17 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson