To the one man who stood up for the babies....Thank You. Just plain common sense.
I hope the prosecution learned from this first trial, and will act accordingly during the 2nd.
Did they act like they shouldn’t be voting?
The woke, hand-selected jurors were supposed to come up with a specific verdict and one juror rose above that. And they were all PO’ed.
I have not been followed this case but it seems that there is no dispute of material fact that this woman willfully strangled her three children to death
What is wrong with our world ?
EVIL WOMEN!!! Thank GOD there was ONE REAL MAN....the other 2 ARE EVIL ALSO!
Nodding (not shaking) her head “no”, gazing down with her eyes closed: I miss the English language we used to share.
Try to keep women off the next jury. Even the ones who claim to be impartial.
“one brave male juror who refused to give in to bullying “
That poor man and his family. Their future is bleak.
Driving around town, I see women walking, jogging, pushing baby strollers, you name it. And unless they are with another person and speaking with them, they are on their phones. Even while pushing a stroller. At least 19 out of 20. As the trail went on, the idea that most of these women jurors were not communicating about the trial outside of the courthouse to friends and relatives and were not consuming social media and news about the trial is just something I do not believe, not at all. At least some of them were very likely flagrantly violating the judge’s repeated orders. It’s a massive problem these days because many people simply refuse to stay off their phones. Look at the video of any crime or accident and the first thing you see is people holding their phones up. Not helping, not running for their lives, nothing but standing there like lemmings with their phones in the air.
All the parties had representation in that courtroom:
Clancy was represented by a team of attorneys.
The prosecution has a team of attorneys.
The babies were represented by one lone courageous juror.
Those female jurors have given America’s enemies cause to point their fingers at us.
First, it was unborn infants, then infants up to the moment of birth, then infants for some short period of time after birth.
By then it was no problem for the radical left to extend the right of a woman's body, especially when beset by hormonal problems, to excuse murdering her children years later. Cases similar to that of Clancy are now becoming commonplace.
Sadly, contributing to the problem are many of the people who claim to be pro-life and anti-abortion. In an August 27, 2026, Federalist article, “The Lindsay Clancy Case Exposes Big Pro-Life’s Woke ‘Second Victim’ Lie”, Dusty Deevers wrote, in part:
Big Pro-Life insists that a mother who intentionally kills her preborn child is abortion’s “second victim,” not a morally responsible agent. The response to Lindsay Clancy carries that same presumption outside the womb: The mother is centered as victim, and accountability is recast as cruelty….
Big Pro-Life cannot wash its hands of this spectacle....
National Right to Life declares that “the pro-life movement recognizes the mother as a second victim in every abortion” and expressly grounds its opposition to punishment or prosecution in that doctrine….
Even Americans United for Life acknowledges that “nearly every state explicitly exempts women from the penalties and punishments associated with violating an abortion law.”
There was a trial in Massachusetts?
“Big Red’s” baby killers are the scum of the Earth. I’m ashamed the hos call themselves Americans. They are not Americans.
I haven’t heard anything about the first jury vote. Be interesting how the other two men voted and if any women voted for conviction.
Can we give Massachusetts back to England?
They should be hung along with Clancy and any POS that supports the killer.
I guess none of them gave a shit about the poor father who lost all of his children to an extremely damaged and evil so-called Mother. This sure is not justice for either the children or the father.
Screw these women.