Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Attorney General Says She’s Taking California to the Supreme Court Over Paramount-Warner Bros. Lawsuit
Variety ^ | August 25, 2026 | Jack Dunn

Posted on 08/26/2026 7:40:56 AM PDT by sphinx

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird wrote in an op-ed for The Daily Wire that she is suing California for leading the charge in the lawsuit against the Paramount–Warner Bros. merger.

“California is once again trying to be the country’s regulator. And once again California is defying common sense to raise costs around the country,” Bird wrote.

Bird argues that “any Iowa family” would tell you the cost of streaming is too high and that there are “fewer quality shows” to choose from. She says these are symptoms of one company getting “too far in front,” and the competitors being “too small to catch up.”

“Netflix dominates the market for streaming,” Bird wrote. “Paramount+ and HBO Max together are smaller than Netflix, smaller than Disney, and smaller than Amazon. The merger could create a company to compete

(Excerpt) Read more at variety.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: merger; paramount; wbd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: sphinx

“”the streamers are now taking over sports broadcasting,””

I believe you since I’ve already admitted I don’t even know what it means. The Braves/Dodgers game last night in Atlanta was broadcast on FOUR DIFFERENT television channels. I couldn’t believe it...I switched from one to the other to see which I liked best. One of the Braves REGULARS for color commentary - Jeff Francoeur - was on a channel I never knew carried the games. I usually watch on Braves Vision (new this year) or FOX network...To make it even more confusing, there are some Braves games that aren’t broadcast at all - except on “apple” whatever that is...A relative in San Diego tears his hair out trying to find the Padres games.


21 posted on 08/26/2026 10:17:12 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert

“”That is the view of a modern day Luddite””

I believe there are more of us than you think..tho’ we are in hiding!


22 posted on 08/26/2026 10:20:01 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

The streamers are taking advantage of HBO’s lawsuit in 1975 against the FCC. Trump is trying to reign in the streamers by pushing reinstatement of the Protected Lists.


23 posted on 08/26/2026 10:27:44 AM PDT by WhiteHatBobby0701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

With AI, I think individual independent studios are the future.


24 posted on 08/26/2026 11:21:44 AM PDT by dynachrome ("The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." —Tacitus, Annals 3.27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

It isn’t that difficult to just abstain from movies. Books, at least the old ones, are better than any movie. Since I’m getting older, I can read books multiple times, each time seems like the first. ;-D


25 posted on 08/26/2026 11:45:38 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

True. I had lost interest in movies a long time. Aside from schlepping my daughters to a few of the age appropriate kids’s movies when they were young, I hadn’t darkened the door of a theater in 20 years.

Then I stumbled across my eye-opener film, realized I had a blind spot, and reengaged.

But again, the upcoming generations are screen addicted. They’re going to be watching something. Movies and tv are still shapers of culture.

It makes a difference who dominates the industry even if we ourselves have lost interest. I’ll never enroll in another college and my kids are out of school. But I’m still concerned with how the educational system is run.

California is practicing lawfare against a company that the LeftWorld types think is politically incorrect. The outcome matters.


26 posted on 08/26/2026 1:04:07 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

The outcome does indeed matter. Electronic media is causing a lot of damage to the common good.


27 posted on 08/26/2026 2:05:16 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

They kind of already do. Truly independent movie makers are still small potatoes, by comparison.


28 posted on 08/27/2026 11:19:57 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Streaming needs to die. As a practical matter, I’d like to see automatic renewals prohibited and to make all renewals opt-in rather than opt-out. Couple that with a mandatory report — perhaps monthly when renewal rolls around, or quarterly — telling each subscriber exactly what he watched on that platform in the reporting period.

A LOT of people would see that they’re paying $20 a month to a streamer on which they’ve not actually watched anything in a long time, and nothing good farther back than they can remember.

Streamers should also have to report to subscribers on their data harvesting: what is collected on each subscriber and to whom it has been sold. The streamers already have this information. It drives their algorithms and directs their marketing teams. I don’t know what the format should look like, but IMHO transparency and consumer right to know are winning issues.


29 posted on 08/27/2026 12:47:21 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Streaming needs to die. As a practical matter, I’d like to see automatic renewals prohibited and to make all renewals opt-in rather than opt-out. Couple that with a mandatory report — perhaps monthly when renewal rolls around, or quarterly — telling each subscriber exactly what he watched on that platform in the reporting period.

A LOT of people would see that they’re paying $20 a month to a streamer on which they’ve not actually watched anything in a long time, and nothing good farther back than they can remember.

Streamers should also have to report to subscribers on their data harvesting: what is collected on each subscriber and to whom it has been sold. The streamers already have this information. It drives their algorithms and directs their marketing teams. I don’t know what the format should look like, but IMHO transparency and consumer right to know are winning issues.


30 posted on 08/27/2026 12:47:25 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Game 1 of the Braves-Dodgers games was one of the 25 games that BravesVision (which is jointly owned by WANF and the Braves) syndicated to its markets.

One thing the Braves are considering is expanding from 25 games to more games available locally. If the Trump Administration pushes for reinstating the Protected List, WANF could air all games during the season.


31 posted on 08/27/2026 2:56:46 PM PDT by WhiteHatBobby0701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

They’ll all still fail anyways. But I agree.

They aren’t learning from thsir mistzkes. More people are rebuilding the8r physical media collections.


32 posted on 08/27/2026 5:16:17 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

If you stream or pay to see a movie, you don’t own anything.

Physical media.

They want everyone to rent everything. They are turning everything into services. This is how they can always control you.

To quote Sharpton, Resist we much.


33 posted on 08/27/2026 6:15:50 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I agree. I’m pretty selective about buying physical media, but when I find a keeper, I’ll buy the DVD or Blu-ray. If the streamer even bothers to issue physical media.

I don’t trust the streamers to keep things available. And they have started to edit. Han shot first.


34 posted on 08/27/2026 8:08:18 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Yeah. But so what if he did? He had a gun pulled on him and being held at gunpoint, and he was able to misdirect and shoot first. I really never understood why it was a big deal in the first place. Its people who don’t understand guns making a major deal about who fires first.


35 posted on 08/29/2026 1:18:12 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson