Posted on 08/02/2026 3:49:55 PM PDT by Jonty30
I can understand selling our your own people in exchange for temporal worldly wealth and power.
But I don't get selling out your family to this same fate, because it is inevitable that what is done to your people will eventually be done to your family.
So, what is in it for the world leaders and parties to destroy their families in the process of mass migration?
Oh Spain , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1pOSFqtN9E
There are accounting issues.
In the USA, the federal government hopes for increases in FICA tax revenue via immigration to support Social Security.
The federal government doesn’t see or have to pay the increased property tax retirees and others must pay as a result of immigration.
To avoid an $2,700/year Social Security cut by forcing an $1,500/year property tax increase doesn’t really improve the retiree Social Security situation since property tax is paid for many years after one’s kids graduate and before one takes Social Security.
And other issues:
Immigrants should possess above average earning ability, be culturally compatible and well-behaved.
Hauling in the world’s trash and disagreeable people will impede the importation of high-quality immigrants at some point.
Because the open border zealots like Biden care nothing about their own children. Just someone else to use.
Add this to your level of disgust: if you oppose mass immigration, whether or not it is illegal*, the MSM now regards you as "far-right". But, of course, the MSM has an agenda.
*I say whether or not illegal because arguably those who were riding on the top of trains or aboard international flights that Biden let in were legal, right?
If they were illegal, our party in opposition would have reacted promptly and effectively. (And people wonder why we voted for Trump!)
I have wondered the same. Some of them are childless, like Mutti Merkel, Kamala Harris.
Perhaps they think their children amd grandchildren and great grandchildren will be like the rich in Mexico and Brazil, guarded and walled off, privileged and rich forever. They have met the rich of those dangerous countries.
Maybe they really are stupid, not seeing how 1% or 3% every year compounds.
Maybe they are arrogant, thinking all the newcomers will assimilate, that they want to assimilate.
Maybe they hate their own people, their childten internalize that and say they don’t plan to have children.
Therr are people on this forum who have said they are glad they are glad their children don’t want children.
Given up hope.
So maybe foolish optimism, blindness, arrogance, despair, self-righteousness, status seeking, despair. In any combination. Humans are not very consistant.
I think most of them DESPISE AMERICA and want it DESTROYED!
High quality to steal our grads jobs? Legal immigration is killing us also.
Read the book.
Imagine now, a new discovery of Gold in Quebec Canada. They need workers so they advertise for Americans to come and work in the mines for $5,000 an hour! (30 hours a week). Would you flock to Canada? With the rich miners would come all the others sudden wealth would bring. Drug dealers, gamblers, Hookers, crime. That what is happening here—the minimum wage is princely to people in the 3rd world. Even prison —with food and all would be a welcome change. Americans seem wealthy beyond the wildest dreams of avarice to them—and we are stupid too. They have no respect for us or our legal system.
The wealthy people think a federal wealth tax is not possible. They are sadly mistaken. The corporations themselves can be federally taxed.
Corporations might have to issue more shares at the rate of 2% a year [or 2.5% a year to be Islamic] to be put into a federal sovereign wealth ETF (and the accounts of lower-income shareholders).
Shares of the federal sovereign wealth ETF might be placed in Newsom accounts.
The word “equity” is used for a reason by the leftists.
Think of zoning as shares. One family might own one of the town’s R-1 shares and another family might own 1.25 acres of the adjacent town’s R-12 shares as well as one of the town’s R-1 shares.
Zoning shares are increasingly subject to redistributive equity dilution, corporate shares will be eventually.
My suggested H-1B system:
1. replace the existing system with a salary-based, monthly in 2025 and weekly thereafter, auction system
2. start with 330 openings per bid period day [and to make the system employer demand responsive]:
a. increase openings by 10 per day, up to 500 openings per day, if the winning bid average goes higher
b. decrease openings by 10 per day, down to 200 openings per day, if the winning bid average goes lower
3. get rid of the bogus can’t find an American nonsense
4. limit H-1Bs to 10% of the number of full-time, directly employed, PPACA-regulated health care cost coverage plan covered employees of the employer having a college degree
5. must work on employer’s premises on employer’s project
6. may not ever serve as a chain migration anchor [at most children/spouse]
7. fees
a. $2,000 per bid fee [to deter bogus/duplicate bids & prevent auction system denial of service], plus
b. a winner fee of 10% of the bid salary, or $8,000, whichever is higher [to compensate for reduced domestic search costs],
c. an annual inverse salary fee of 10% of the salary amount less than $200,000 plus 20% of the salary amount less than $120,000, plus
d. a payroll health coverage cost savings fee of $6 per week per year of age under age 65 [so highly experienced Americans not replaced by cheap, healthy young foreigners]
8. The Secretary of Labor shall compile computer software development language lists each December and May [college course completion months]
and shall only list languages it found to have been in existence for at least one year
9. H-1B persons can’t start work coding in a software development project in any Secretary of Labor-listed language
10. H-1B persons can’t do managerial work in their first two years in the program
The person must have at least a four-year degree in a statutorily specified subject from a Secretary of Education list of selected, respected educational institutions.
The minimum salary amount should be 120% of the most recent DoL salary survey average for the degree and years of experience using a least vertical offset squares minimized curve. If the degree is foreign, the closest common domestic degree shall be the standard to which the 120% is applied.
The H-1Bs should be bid out and awarded based on the salary premium in dollars to the minimum.
The bidder must have paid FICA in excess of $50,000 for the penultimate year per winner (to block out scammers). The Secretary of Labor may waive this requirement for up to 1,000 people per year. The bidder must have already won at auction. Auction fees would not be refunded if the waiver is not granted. The waivers will permit startups to import talent.
There would be no requirement beyond common sense to seek domestic talent (as the idea that no domestic person can be found to do a lawful high-tech job is ridiculous). The winner fee of at least $8,000 will encourage paying for a search for domestic talent.
A subsequent employer of a person would have to have a subsequent winning bid for the person.
Allowing an imported person to find a better employer would discourage employer abuse of imported employees.
The previous employer would have a qualified (subject to then current law) right to import an eligible replacement person at the bid salary or higher if the person left within one year of auction close.
After six years of salary payment at the person’s initial winning bid level or higher, the H-1B person might then be awarded permanent residence if the law in effect at the time allows for it.
[If the salary is $80,000, the annual inverse salary fee would be $20,000 ($12,000 plus $8,000).]
[The software body shops would need to set up partnerships with American colleges to meet most of their staffing needs.]
My answer is that they aren’t deliberately selling out, instead, they have come to believe their own lies because that easier than facing the horror of what they have done.
The best example of this is the parents of so called trans kids. Imagine being one of these mothers who encouraged a son to go through that horror. At done point the truth becomes obvious to everyone - even the child - that it was a mistake - and the child is ruined for life.
But can that mother ever admit to being wrong? No. To admit that would be to admit you mutilated your own child.
Maybe it’s the same with all these issues.. they just can’t tell themselves the truth because it’s to much of an admission.
IDK.. that’s all I can come up with.
“destroy their families in the process of mass migration?”
What would you do if it was no longer safe to live in the USA?
You’d emigrate.
Some countries would surely like to get 10% of your income for doing nothing other than letting you reside in their country.
Those countries won’t accept our two-legged trash or freaks.
If you’re a member of the ruling elite, you can afford those things like professional security to insulate your family from the effects of illegal immigration.
They have money to live far from the madness. It doesn’t affect them.
“trans kids”
*************
“To get along, go along.”
At age 18, Adios.
“If you’re a member of the ruling elite, you can afford those things like professional security to insulate your family from the effects of illegal immigration.”
A family that had a relative who lived in Tucson might disagree.
Many Mexican families would disagree.
Ask Wildberries executives about the limitations of professional security.
You can, for a time, protect your family. But it isnt forever.
I think what is happening is an application Christ’s words, what you do for the least of thee you do it for me.
“They have money to live far from the madness. It doesn’t affect them.”
A huge ‘Obamanation’[IMO] apartment complex is nearing completion about 500 feet from a top-end gated community about two miles to the north.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.