[ClearCase_guy]

First Amendment really does need to be modified. Outlaw the practice and presence of Muslims. They say that Sharia Law is above US Constitutional Law, and we can’t allow that viewpoint in our country.

[Carry_Okie]

No it doesn’t. Muslims, as a matter of doctrine, have no intention of upholding the Constitutional mandates to protect the rights of all citizens. They are therefore not participants in the social contract that is the Constitution. Indeed, they have every intention of overthrowing it.

Something they have in common with Marxists.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

One problem is in defining Islam as a Religion rather than a Criminal Enterprise or as a form of Arabic Imperialism or as a that uses religion to threaten or reward adherents. The Mafia sponsoring a St Joesph day float does not change the fact that the members are criminals.

I sort of agree with you. Examples of Historical "Religions" that we would not allow in The U.S. because they engage in criminality; Now defunct Thugee (Human sacrifice...strangling people to death and robbing them.) The Mayan, Azetec, and Incan religions; They all practiced Human Sacrifice, some on a large scale. The Druids also practiced human sacrifice in burning people to death.

I think we should start making a point that people Who kill a bunch of non islamic people and justify it as Jihad, by stating Allie Akbar afterwards, etc, are sacrificing other human beings, Non Muslim humans, for the purpose of obtaining a better reward in the Islamic Afterlife. Their religion grants individuals agency to do this. (And of course just blames on a sudden case of the Crazies, wink, wink.)