To: CDR Kerchner
This is a matter for Congress, not the Judiciary.
To: ComputerGuy
Agree.
The pre-17th Amendment Congress didn’t punt difficult matters.
Reelection and reelection alone motivates today’s Congress-persons.
13 posted on
04/12/2026 1:30:53 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: ComputerGuy
Either way, I can see how this might get screwed up every way possible, but I prefer “qualified” citizenship, not automatic.
16 posted on
04/12/2026 1:38:26 PM PDT by
oldtech
To: ComputerGuy
"This is a matter for Congress, not the Judiciary."
It's now in the Supreme Court because Repukes have kicked the ball down the road for decades on this issue, just like they do with everything else. Gutless wonders.
25 posted on
04/12/2026 1:51:59 PM PDT by
mass55th
(“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
To: ComputerGuy
Another item to add to the list for the Article V convention...
29 posted on
04/12/2026 2:05:10 PM PDT by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson