Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/10/2026 9:15:43 AM PDT by Signalman
Rep. Brandon Gill is picking a public fight with fellow House Republicans over immigration, torching the DIGNIDAD Act as “mass amnesty” and daring its backers to say out loud what he says the bill does.
“The Dignity Act is mass amnesty and would constitute a terrible betrayal of our voters,” Gill wrote on X, after GOP lawmakers, including Rep. Mike Lawler of New York, talked up renewed interest in the proposal. Gill then turned his fire directly at the bill’s supporters: “If your bill were so popular, you’d be straightforward about what it does. The DIGNIDAD Act provides mass amnesty to over 10 million illegal aliens.”
He added, “I’ll be clear about what I want: mass deportations. Will you be equally straightforward and admit DIGNIDAD is an amnesty bill?”
The DIGNIDAD Act, H.R. 4393, is a sweeping immigration package that creates a legalization-style program for certain illegal immigrants who have been in the United States for years, paired with enforcement and system changes. The legislation was introduced in the House in 2025 and remains a live flashpoint inside a GOP conference that ran on border security and tougher enforcement.
Conservatives who oppose the bill argue that any legal status for people who entered the country illegally is amnesty in a new wrapper, and they say it clashes with what Republican voters demanded after years of record border chaos. Supporters counter that it is not a blank check, pointing to background checks, fines and eligibility rules, and arguing it forces people “out of the shadows” while prioritizing removals for criminals.
That argument did not calm the base, and it did not calm Gill.
He blasted the broader direction of the proposal, writing: “The ‘DIGNIDAD Act’ gives legal status to ~12 million illegal aliens, massively increases legal immigration, and expands work visas that replace American workers and undercut wages. Use all the euphemistic generalizations you want, but it’s still an amnesty bill.”
Gill also framed the moment as a direct test of Republican promises after 2024, “The reality is that mass migration is wrecking our working class, tearing apart America’s social fabric, and making our communities unrecognizable. And this bill only makes it worse. Our voters want their country back. They voted for mass deportations, and that’s what we owe them.”
Salazar, the bill’s face in Congress, hit back online and insisted critics are mischaracterizing the measure, describing it as enforcement-first and rejecting the claim that it’s a giveaway. “This is enforcement first: zero tolerance for criminals, permanent border security, and hard, earned requirements to step forward and face the law, so American workers are protected, not undercut,” she wrote.
She also pushed back on Gill’s framing, writing “Amnesty is the chaos you’ve defended, millions in the shadows, no control, no accountability, and a system that stopped working a long time ago. No shortcuts. No giveaways. No blanket forgiveness. That’s law and order. That’s DIGNITY.”
The dustup is now spilling beyond two members trading punches on social media. Conservative groups are using the clash to pressure Republicans who they say are trying to “rebrand” legalization as reform. One such group, Republican National Conservative, accused GOP lawmakers of ignoring the message voters sent and said: “The American people didn’t vote for freebies for illegals, more excuses, immigration loopholes, or a safety net for people who came here illegally and stayed here illegally. Voters actually did the complete opposite, and voted to undo the disaster Joe Biden created when he blew the border wide open and turned the country into a free-for-all.”
The group also aimed at Lawler by name, saying “Mike Lawler is pretending he is not pushing amnesty while pushing amnesty. And the GOP base should be asking one simple question: after everything this country has been put through on immigration, why is a Republican helping Democrats by cutting illegals a break?”
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Bit, but, but we HAVE to re-elect them because the Dems are worse!
Blah, blah, blah.
To hell with these fake Republicans. Probably from squishy dustricts.
83% of new Naturalized citizens vote Democrat in their first Presidential election.
Yes - the Hispanic vote for Trump in 2024 was an all time GOP high - 46%
That was a One Time election - based entirely on the Biden Open Borders policy, and on a completely unique candidate, Donald Trump!
“Forces them out of the shadows.”
They have been using that tired cliché for 25 years. Time to find another one.
Bought Off
Left Wing Rhinos .
They love that cheap labor
and be permanent Dem voters and spawn more evil Rat voters...
This is really about getting rid of White people. Who is paying the sponsors of the bill?
“The republican’ts are always ready to sell Americans down the river in favor of illegals. Prove me wrong.”
I said a year ago that they would eventually call for amnesty.
Lawler needs to be defeated by a Patriot.
Yes. Watched him on Laura Ingraham and he acted clueless as she pointed out the crazy stuff in this bill.
the CoC cucks want to reduce the self deports
“sneak into the country and make it 10 years without getting caught”
This amnesty bill just says “take their word for it.” There is absolutely nothing that requires any sort of proof. And there are so many loopholes and carveouts anyone here illegally, even just by a week, gains lawyers and years to go through the system to get amnesty. And that Tuesday, Salazer, admitted the main goal is to wait for another democrat party majority and president and they pass a “pathway to citizenship.” I wouldn’t be surprised when the democrats, with much help from the squish GOP, add an constitutional amendment that anyone who steps foot on US soil is instantly given citizenship.
What Salazar is saying is the same recycled things they have said everytime an amnesty has been passed.
It historically has never worked out that way.
They also say it’s the last time we will ever do an amnesty. That’s been said multiple times too, every time they pass an amnesty.
Words are very cheap. It would not be rational to believe anyone who wants this piece of leglation passed.
Two years ago, I predicted Trump would vigorously pursue criminal immigrants in 2025, less vigorously in 2026, and support a moderate Amnesty in January 2027.
Two out of three, so far.
They shove it in our faces using the Spanish form of “dignity”.
Very undignified is what it is.
‘Lawler needs to be defeated by a Patriot.”
He will definitely be defeated this year.
It will not be by a patriot.
That Constitution amendment should expand the native born citizen rule from just the president to every elected official above Dog Catcher.
It's sickening that almost every foreign born elected official, Democrat or Republican, immediately works on legislation to help their tribe at the expense of American taxpaying citizen.
To repeat the often-stated obvious:
The GOP is, once again, as expected and predicted, “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory”...
Joe McCarthy warned us of the communist threat, and he was silenced and erased...
The communist victory was assured not by the demoncrats, but by the closet communists who represent 1/3 of the GOP...
In 2026 the GOP plot to throw the midterms so the dems can take over the hard work of blocking trump is to suddenly make amnesty their big issue.
Uniparty will remain undefeated.
__________________________________________________________
Yeah, but why is Trump contributing to the headwinds of the GOP going into the midterms? We did not need this foreign policy albatross at any time, but especially a few months before the November Midterms. Who are the people that convinced Trump that it was a good idea regarding timing, method, and purpose of this war? They should be summarily fired.
If they had any dignity, they wouldn’t have broken our laws to come here, nor jump the line and walk over the backs of others who have been waiting in line ahead of them to come here legally.
It's "natural-born" citizen. Not "native born".
Stop misrepresenting the language found in the Constitution. We have enough problems as it is without carelessness.
Lawyer is a regular guest on Sid Rosenberg’s WABC morning show. He was on the other day and Sid asked him about his support for the bill. He danced around the question to the point that Sid just gave up. I caught him with Laura and she was having none of it. She slapped him around pretty good. I don’t trust the guy and I realize he’s in a Democratic district but he just proves that these Congresscritters will do or say anything to get elected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.