Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/01/2026 Vol.518, Q Day 3,078

“Please send your friends info on India source”

ditto here also, TYIA

Soon to be our prayer time.
Join in at 3:15 Eastern to
pray for our nation and FRens.

I lie down and sleep; I
wake again, because the
LORD sustains me. I will
not fear the tens of
thousands drawn up against
me on every side.
Psa. 3:5-6

OMG, I love you bitt!!!

Skip this long post about the purge, demise and resurrection of Hollywood
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/01/2026 Vol.518, Q Day 3,078, generally wrote:
Very interesting take.
My one quibble with that is that it would indicate that the quality is dropping because the satanists are being removed.
I would like to think that the removal of the satanists increases the quality of tv/movies.
There are many moving parts. Removal of the Satanists includes the removal of the black market funding based on, among other things, child trafficking. The Deep State funded it's MK Ultra talent hub well - it was a key part of indoctrination which even the CCP couldn't resist supporting. Now Hollywood must learn how to be independent and profitable without sugar daddies to fund their excesses.
If talented cinematographers wanted access to expertise and technology to develop their skills, they had to be Satanists for entry. They weren't inherently better than those who would not kill for a position, but they were given experience and access to technology and time with experts to develop their talents. The same was true for writers, directors and movie runners. It was also true for actors - although some were only in place because of membership in the Satanist club. Those unwilling to sacrifice to join the Satanistic club now have to struggle to acquire access, experience, expertise and reputation now that the field has been cleared.
The removal of Satanists, and others like Hillary, Obama etc. is burdening Hollywood to conceal discrepancies between traditional cinematography and AI, as AI now replaces elites. Film quality today is a prime topic for critics - visual color and clarity in filming is often much poorer now than it was in the 70's. Therefore films are darker, often have blurry backgrounds, poor lighting, tend to look artificial and lack rich color and clarity. This impacts the audience response as well with reviewers noting that it defeats viewer involvement (i.e., less for the audience to see and 'share' in the experience).
I wrote, The movie critics I've been watching on Youtube repeatedly bring up the various ways the performance of Hollywood by studio heads, show runners, writers, actors, cinematographers etc. all defy explanation. Taken together, I believe they are pointing to declines across the board resulting from the White Hats' purge of the Satanists in Hollywood.
There are just so many 'bad decisions' being made, on top of bad decisions and laced with more bad decisions in the middle of financial crisis. The reviewers I've watched struggle to figure out WHY the industry appears intent on making television/movies the audience hates. I now suspect this is a feature, not a bug. It looks like part of the goal of rebuilding Hollywood is to destroy fan loyalty/cultural connection to the past and build it anew with new products/people.
There are numerous changes made in the past 10 years which are repelling movie fans. The heroes are actually becoming villains and deemed 'morally grey' (Iron Heart - she aspires to find work at a tech lab large enough for her to steal parts, she makes a deal with Satan, leaves a friend to die, feels entitled). Males are often weak and incompetent. Females routinely replace males and are shown excersing superior strenth and combat techniques, thereby defeating men in hand-to-hand combat.
Many of the reviewers talk about what almost seems like methodical destruction of movie franchises (IP's) which most say began in 2016 and has only accelerated since then. They note gender swapping (male heroes replaced with females (e.g., Ghost Busters 2 2016). They also point to race swapping (e.g., actor Alan Rickman's pale white Prof. Snape has been replaced with a black actor with dredlocks wearing a black track suit under his professorial robes).
Fans have been making memes ridiculing the 'cool' or 'gansta' apparel of the Snape replacement, and AI jokes feature him throwing money and acting 'gangsta' in a 'official' (fake) AI rap video.
Saturday Night Live has made fun of the problems this race swapping of Snape will create given that 'mixed blood' characters are already called 'mudbloods', Snape is hung from a tree by other (white) characters, or white students' biggest fear is (black) Snape.
Public ridicule is common among fan groups who reject movies/television episodes which studio's are preparing for their entertainment; this negative feedback seems to have no impact, and sometimes seems to fuel more such 'innovations.'
Modern films typically portray women as 'girl bosses' who save men from danger. These female heroes are naturally perfect and simply have to discover how wonderful they are, as if imperfections constitute mysogyny.
Prior heroes from lucrative, older franchises are brought back in sequels to destroy them. Harrison Ford's character in a Star Wars sequel stupidly 'walks into a light saber' (carelessly dies), and in the latest Indiana Jones film, the 'hero' is now a washed up old man who just wants to sit in his room and die. Samuel Jackson's tough guy character, Nick Fury, is now an old broken man, and fans are shown that the eye patch he wears conceals damage done by a cat, not a villain.
Fans of the original movie 'The Joker' were disappointed that the sequel took away all features of the character which pointed to the importance of resistance (don't stop resisting) and replaced it with a character who realizes the hard way that there's no point in resistance - relief is possible only with compliance (e.g., you can't win). Reviewers commented that it was if the film makers were giving fans the middle finger in order to defeat support for the idea of resistance.
The British Dr. Who fan base was disappointed when two lesbians replaced the (traditional) Doctor. His 'betters' told him, 'You know nothing, and we know everything.' Then the two women were replaced with a new Doctor - a gay black man in the habit of crying and wearing skirts, flirting with men etc. This British franchise with decades of history decided to provide its audience with a Rwandan gay Doctor and sensless/woke plots as replacements.
More often than not, female heroes are intentionally selected to avoid drawing the 'male gaze.' Female heroines currently grimace and sweat to avoid appearing feminine, and are portrayed as inevitably beating up witless males.
The traditional comic book presentation of a character Red Sonja was certainly designed to appeal to men.
Upon viewing the latest iteration of Red Sonja (below), reviewer Disparu (a male) observed, "Something seems to be missing," and, "Put me in a wig, we'd look very similar."
Below, Disparu compares the traditional character, Laura Croft, played by Angelina Jolie,
with the same (comic book) character designed 'for modern audiences', which employs sweat stains to hint that she's actually not a man.
It's not unusual for actors, writers and directors to publicly insult fans, or use Social Media to hammer on critics. This is yet one more way the industry is repelling ticket buyers.
Star Wars hero Luke Skywalker is shown as a burned old out man milking green milk from a monster's mammary gland and drinking it rough, with green fluid matting in his beard. People watch these hero replacments and the overall trajectory of the plans for more episodes, and conclude 'Star Wars is dead.' Fandom abandons the franchise.
There are many Star Wars spinoffs which are also flying into the ground at warp speed. Asoka is a Star Wars spinoff featuring a coven of lesbian witches who give birth without the involvement of males. Star Wars of the past never had anything to do with gay witches. The show runners who intentionally create plots and characters to repell fans brag, 'Now that's cannon!' (i.e., we changed the Star Wars history and trajectory forever!).
The low point for fans of Star Trek, a franchise dating back to the 60's, appears to be on the horizon. Youtube cinema reviewers watch latest episodes as part of their job. They passionately hate watching the latest Star Trek series, with some producing videos in which they emote their disgust in ways I found entertaining. Here's an example in which the reviewer asserts it is the worst hour of programming in television history.
Starfleet Academy - The Episode that Broke me
Show runners for the latest spinoff of Star Trek said they conceived of Starfleet Academy as similar to 'Harry Potter in Space', which reviewers describe as a series of no interest to anyone. The program is a peculiar, obnoxious mix of gay themes (homoerotic breathing excercise between men), incompetence (an elite cadet accidentally swallows her communications badge again), and immature/incompetent cadets engaging in emotional drama.
Starfleet Academy features odd errors in the science that attracted people to Star Trek in the first place (e.g., sonic weapons used in space). The ship is under attack from behind, so the captain mumbles instructions to divert all energy to protect the front of the ship. The 'captain' doesn't like to wear shoes and teaches students to cheat etc.
Watching a review of this mess, noting how much the reviewers hate every moment of witnessing it, and then viewing the scene where a character is said to be of a race which naturally vomits glitter when ill, I have a hard time thinking this is an example of Hollywood's frantic effort to restore profitibility as the industry dives.
Fans did not expect much of the latest Star Trek spinoff series after the approx 10 years they've been exposed to repulsive programming. The studio took the novel step of releasing the premier episode to Youtube for free. Reviewer Nerdrotic decided to test fan interest by posting a rival video featuring an inanimate Spock action figure. More fans tuned in to watch the Spock figure seated on a chair than the latest Star Wars premier.
For those following the industry's steep unwavering dive, the announcement that Stephen Cobert will write the next Lord of the Rings episode is a logical move.
"We really are living in bizarro world at this point, with the news that Stephen Colbert is set to write a sequel to Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy."
Colbert's prior work experience would make him a natural choice for the next Lord of the Rings in today's current Hollywood.
At some point, I began to look past the idea that this was just wokeism run amok, and it began to look more like white hats or other patriots somehow nudging Hollywood to 'burn the ships so no one could return home again.' Detach the public from memories and fandom to movies/actors/directors which will one day all be exposed as Satanic.
If any one or two studios or small groups of idiots were making decisions, one after another, which disgusted fans, I could attribute it to wokism based failure. But so many of the largest, most enduringly iconic franchises are all marching to the beat of the same woke drum while Hollywood's fortunes drops like a rock. I don't believe studios are trying to become profitable quickly by offending everyone they can, and continually hiring the same people who fail to produce content with the same flaws.
These decisions, including the selection of Colbert, are obviously not money making ideas. So whose ideas are they? I think only the top most people with control of the budget would need to have a (white hat or patriotic) reason to authorize disaster move after disaster move. Below that top level, one could simply decline to interfere with our woke enemies who are destroying themselves. Feed the leftist impulse money/scripts and let them soil themselves (their reputations, their products)?
When show runners or writers are asked about these unpopular (i.e., hated) 'diverse' or 'modern' changes, and their impacts on fans, they say they are writing for 'modern audiences'. To industry watchers, that translates into saying they are writing to offend and repel fans of the old series or products prior to 2016.
It's not possible to vacuum out so many people in central positions without rubble, and requiring the industry to rebuild itself. It can now become superior to the past if Hollywood holds out for talent and merit instead of Harvey Weinstein's racket or a demonstrated willingness to kill children. However, new Hollywood has to climb the learning curve.
I just watched a Nerdrotic episode in which a Writers Guild member says employment is at 10% for writers in Hollywood. Titles of industry reviews include "Hollywood is burning" "Hollywood is Doomed" "Hollywood self-destructs...." etc.
Driving away paying customers at warp speed when the industry is in collapse doesn't make sense, unless there's a desire to remove the cultural attachment among the public to products and actors which they will eventually realize were toxic waste, during a time of structural implosion of the industry.
Entertainment reviewers have pronounced the Star Wars and Star Trek Franchises as dead, along with other iconic series. Alienated fans will not show up movie theatres or tune in to watch new offerings; for this reason many film critics believe the franchise(s) need to be shut down for 10 years before anyone tries to make another episode.
Putting iconic productions on a 10 year hiatus is exactly what Hollywood needs to do to reinvent itself - stay away from prior iconic products and the people who made them. Show runners, actors, directors, writers etc. now producing trash products will not be missed when they no longer receive work. For now, visual quality will be kept dim, dark, blurry, fake etc. until the AI improves anyway, so they will not compare well to original blockbusters. Therefore, the hiatus strategy limits comparisons.
Out of the ashes a few bright lights (movies/series) have emerged. Here and there, heroes have begun to be written as heroic again (e.g., A Night of the Seven Kingdoms). These break out efforts aren't that well funded but they win public interest from a public which has been weaned off former expectations for movie/television entertainment.
And so I think the massive Hollywood aircraft carrier is turning so gradually that the movement is not perceived, but course corrections appear to be leading it out of the icebergs and into open water again.
Return to top

🚨 50 YEARS AGO TODAY: Dodgers legend Rick Monday became an American hero.

Two protesters ran onto the field at Dodger Stadium trying to burn the American flag… and Rick Monday sprinted in like a damn boss and SNATCHED it right out of their hands.

No hesitation. No apologies. Pure patriotism

https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/2048111400233439527?s=20

Check freepmail in a minute or so.

Thank you for the thoughtful reply.

I am thinking that perhaps the satanists have not yet been removed. Perhaps we are in the Biden phase in Hollywood - the phase where the corruption and rot is being exposed.

It is better and funnier when the pirates find out that the ship they attacked is a warship.

WHY IS SPLC SENDING MILLIONS TO THE CAYMAN ISLANDS?

The Southern Poverty Law Center now holds a massive endowment of roughly $732–738 million (as of late 2024), with total net assets exceeding $780 million. A large portion of this money is invested in high-risk hedge funds, private equity, and other alternative assets. Much of it flows through offshore tax havens like the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, and the British Virgin Islands.
MORE...
https://x.com/ginamilan_/status/2047789823075705203?

(HE CUTE!)

😅😄

https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/2048083107027247398

Trump is in an overwhelming dominant position, and it improves as more time passes. He has no issues waiting.

Iran lose $500 million per day, while global energy trade is funneled to the US.

There also seems to be some disagreement as to who is truly in charge in Iran.

Iran will be squeezed until they give Trump exactly what he wants, or he is simply going to take it. Trump has made it abundantly clear to the public, that he gave Iran every opportunity to choose the diplomatic off ramp.

Fox News are now reporting that Trump has called off his envoy from heading to Pakistan.

Sounds like Trump is done negotiating.

Iran can either agree to Trump’s terms, or face economic collapse and decimation of their infrastructure.

Give us the uranium, or we will take it.

That’s the exact same relational style/wording as the SEC fraud “whistleblower” one isn’t it?...

“I’ve been holding a secret for 11 years.,,

BookmarQ....

.

Today's AWK video.

4.25.26: Precious METALS important for FUTURE of AMERICA, Revolt against DOLLAR, PRAY!

MAGA Posts
Obama weaponized race	SPLC unmasked	If you don’t you should	New podcast wish
Arizona event	Paper ballots only	Trump Lafayette Park	John Thune deep state

Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.

Where We Go 1, We Go All