Will New Election Evidence Damage the Supreme Court?

American Thinker ^ | 1 Feb, 2026 | John Green

[MtnClimber]

Congratulations, Chief Justice Roberts. You kept your hands clean. But at what cost?

The “stock in trade” of judges is trust. The only thing that gives a jurist’s opinion weight is public confidence that the guy in the black robe honestly and properly applied the law as prescribed by his oath. Unfortunately, courts at all levels seem to gleefully disregard the importance of that trust.

Local judges appear uninterested in public order. Their release of violent offenders with low or no bail to prey on the innocent has become an epidemic.

District judges are busily trying to nullify an election. They are ruling that Congress may neither legislate nor appropriate and that the president needs their permission to enforce duly enacted laws and conduct foreign affairs.

The Supreme Court sits atop that chaos, more concerned with conflict avoidance that defense of the Constitution. We are galled by the chief justice’s gaslighting that the Article III branch of government can be trusted. His claim that “there are no Obama judges, Biden judges, nor Trump judges” was a lie that he insisted we accept despite what we were clearly observing.

For elections to work, mere accuracy is insufficient. They must be transparent and beyond reproach, not riddled with question marks. There will always be millions of Americans dissatisfied with the outcome of any one election, but we expect them to abide by the outcome, because it represents the will of the majority. A peaceful transfer of power depends on the minority believing that an election does in fact represent the will of the majority.

Unfortunately, the conduct of the 2020 election created suspicion rather than confidence.

- A pandemic was used to justify rule changes that loosened election controls.

- The MSM hid relevant information from the voters until after the election.

[epluribus_2]

The greatest empire in the world at the time, The Roman Republic, fell from corruption, greed, and public indifference. We need to learn by their human tendency mistakes.

[JayGalt]

It took me a while but here is your source attributed to Trump.
Donald Trump just posted evidence Democrats are stealing our elections

For the 2020 Election:

Pennsylvania:

- 205,000 more votes than registered voters
- Over 1.5 million fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes
- These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out
- Over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine
- 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever
- More than 1.5 million votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state

Georgia:

- 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted
- 2,500 convicted felons voted
- Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote count instantaneously
- 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters.

Arizona:

- The final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non-citizens voted in the state
- Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden

“These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the Secretary of State’s website before the content was removed, or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night”

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2017990525270544889?s=20

[Brian Griffin]

The federal government might require states to notify the FEC so the FEC could send coded postage stamps to the voter.

Returned ballot envelopes without the matching coded stamps would then have the presumption of being fraudulent.

The coded stamps would typically not be thrown in the trash because they would have value as ordinary stamps.

[MayflowerMadam]

Trump did mention Cruz for SCOTUS. 🤔

[curious7]

Good. He needed to resign several decades ago, but lacks the sense of honor to do so.

[9422WMR]

“ there has never been any study showing that Black people are any less likely than anyone else to have government issued photo ID.”
So 12% of the population influence national elections because they “ might” be unable to obtain an ID to vote?
That’s incredibly racist to insinuate they are too stupid to get an ID. You can’t buy sudafed without an ID in many states. Or buy beer or tobacco.
And just try to register a vehicle with a drivers license. You are SOL.

[caddie]

I think this is a great idea, IRS helping audit judges frequently.

[Pete Dovgan]

Exactly. Another person who understands history and human nature. I agree.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

I have had no respect for Roberts since he upheld Obamacare. /furious

[Mlheureux]

This Sleeping Judge group has been around for over 50 years. I was recruited while in law school in 1973. There are mayors , city attorneys, police and judges in on it. They are recruited while in school. Pretend to be middle of the road, then when an important event happens they act in the best interest of the national socialist movement.