Posted on 01/07/2026 9:57:08 PM PST by grundle
Why is the mainstream media ignoring this particular video from this particular angle of the shooting of Renee Good by ICE agents in Minnesota?
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
btt
“caused ICE person to overreact on impulse”
Have you ever been dragged by a car? That over-impulsive ICE agent has! And have you ever had a car initially point at you and start accelerating? In the 0.5 seconds you have to make a decision, do YOU bend over to see if the wheels are starting to turn?
“I just get the sense that…”
Are you can Candace Owens fan? “I don’t know know, but I know...”
During the Jan. 6 Capitol riot an unarmed woman (Ashley Babbitt) was shot and killed by an officer as she was climbing through a window, hardly a life and limb threat to the cop.
Democrats nearly unanimously hailed the cop’s actions and awarded him a medal for helping to “save democracy.”
The same Democrats gave it about ten minutes after yesterday’s shooting to demand the ICE agent’s head.
Sadly, 100% predictable behavior.
“Every cop in the U.S. is cautioned about standing in
front of a stopped...”
Try looking at the video. He WAS NOT standing in front of the car!
As she backed up, turning, the front end swung around and was THEN pointed at him! It is at 5 seconds in this video:
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/2008976323880874383
Because it shows she was trying to run over the law officer.
Based. The ICE-man did what he had to do. No other options remained.
Congressional action is needed to codify the lawlessness of sanctuary cities and the consequences of that behavior.
I fully blame Congress that would rather allow the battle of rival executive orders set the tone instead of putting their name and votes on the direction of this nation.
The DOGE impact alone tells me NONE of our elected representatives deserve to be re-elected.
The system is not broken; this Constitution is made for a moral and religious people.
Trump is the most practical president we have ever had - Congressional failure has allowed Trump to demonstrate this practicality. This shooting is the new ‘civil disobedience’; the opposition has no respect for life and are willing to sacrifice their useful idiots to promote the lies.
BINGO! Give the man a cigar.
Another Trans, LBGQ, HOMO,LESBO NUT CASE!
I respectfully disagree.
Judging from the quality of people they are hiring to be ICE agents, it's a good thing - from their viewpoint - they have qualified immunity.
From the viewpoint of the citizen, qualified immunity is not a good thing.
ICE is not hiring the best and the brightest. They've probably hired a lot of bad ex-police who have had issues and might have a hard time getting employment in traditional LE. The fact that this particular agent defied common sense and stood in front of a running vehicle with the driver behind the wheel is indicative of a poorly trained officer.
We don't know who any of these agents are because their identities are hidden. This conveniently doesn't allow the public to be informed about their histories.
The public has a basic right to be informed about the identities of public employees, who are paid with public funds.
But that's not the world we're currently living in.
The option is to have a privately funded federal force, which I fear will be a reality some day, since we're living in a time when the foundational ideals of America are being obliterated.
There are too-many-to-count videos on YouTube showing really bad policing, officers blatantly violating citizens' constitutional protections. In some instances, when the violations are obvious, juries have awarded substantial damages.
People don't realize how tenuous the Bill of Rights is, especially amendments four and five.
The woman made a dumb error and lost her life for it. If this was better trained officer the outcome would have been different.
That’s ridiculous. They have showed INCREDIBLE self restraint while being constantly threatened and verbally and physically assaulted.
Admin, would it be possible to send these TDS Anti ICE imposters to Reddit?
The intention of the driver is unknowable, and legally irrevelant. What is legally relevant is whether or not the officer could reasonably believe that he was in imminent danger of his life, or great bodily harm, and deadly force on his part could remove the danger. Not reasonably believe after long deliberation and debate, reasonably believe in the small moment available to him.
All disputes should be resolved using minimal force necessary, but no less than minimal force. We do not give disruptive minorities veto power over our laws.
He approached the vehicle from the front.
Officers are trained to approach vehicles from behind and from the side.
If they are forced to approach from the front they must take extra precaution to not put themselves in harm's way.
This video can be slowed down, and it's obvious that the officer was too close to the front of the vehicle. If he had to approach from the front, he should have been farther away.
We first see him in front of the vehicle at around 8 seconds; at 9 seconds, still in front, he stops and draws his weapon.
Why did he stop in front of the vehicle?
Can you see the line of sight of the bullet? It went thru the windshield then thru the airhead’s head then thru the headrest. The means the suv was heading towards the shooter, CASE CLOSED.
Move Minneapolis because I hear they need more lazy bad cops there.
:: Why did he stop in front of the vehicle? ::
Because she started backing up.
She moved the car, which IMPO, showed intention to flee.
She stopped, aimed her front wheels in his direction and accelerated, only turning to the right when he removed his handgun.
Again, using ‘stop-motion’ on available videos.
What exactly is so offensive or problematic with my post that you want me removed from FR? Can't you argue in good faith?
There is no rancor or offensive language in my post; I'm insulting no one. There's nothing personal in my post towards anyone.
The thing you have a problem with is my viewpoint because it's in opposition to yours.
You actually want to have someone removed from FR because they have a different viewpoint than you do?
Are we still in America?
Clearly you don’t support the ice officer in question. You stated your opinion now please stop. We get it and where you come from. I suggest Reddit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.